STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Improved mechanical properties of contemporary composites has resulted in the extended use of composites for the restoration of posterior teeth. Although the indication of polymers was extended to metal-free individual crowns, the influence of tooth preparation design and cementation methods on the stability of these artificial crowns remains unknown.
PURPOSE
This in vitro study evaluated the effect of axial tooth preparation design, occlusal dimension, and cementation technique on the fracture resistance of metal-free posterior Artglass crowns.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Seventy-two extracted human third molars, assigned to experimental groups by size, received standardized tooth preparation. Axial tooth preparation included an invasive approach with 1-mm deep shoulder and a less invasive 0.5-mm chamfer preparation, whereas occlusal reduction was either 0.5 mm or 1.3 mm. Artglass crowns that restored the original tooth contour were cemented with 3 cements: zinc phosphate cement (ZnP), glass ionomer cement (GIC), or a resinous cement in combination with a dentinal bonding agent. After 10,000 thermal cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, artificial crowns were vertically loaded until compression to failure. Significant differences of fracture loads between experimental groups were assessed by paired Mann-Whitney U tests.
RESULTS
Minimal fracture resistance for all combinations excluded 500 N. However, 9 of 24 Artglass crowns cemented with ZnP loosened after thermocycling. Adhesive cementation resulted in a significantly greater fracture resistance compared with GIC and ZnP (P=.02). Increased occlusal thickness (0.5 to 1.3 mm) resulted in greater stability, whereas a 1-mm deep shoulder tooth preparation did not improve durability compared with a 0.5-mm chamfer finishing line.
CONCLUSION
A minimally invasive 0.5-mm axial chamfer tooth preparation combined with sufficient occlusal reduction and adhesive cementation recorded the greatest stability for posterior metal-free Artglass crowns.
[1]
F. M. Gardner,et al.
In vitro failure load of metal-collar margins compared with porcelain facial margins of metal-ceramic crowns.
,
1997,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[2]
B. K. Moore,et al.
In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents.
,
1998,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[3]
C H Gibbs,et al.
Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission.
,
1981,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[4]
C J Goodacre,et al.
The effect of finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns.
,
1993,
The International journal of prosthodontics.
[5]
F. Burke.
Maximising the fracture resistance of dentine-bonded all-ceramic crowns.
,
1999,
Journal of dentistry.
[6]
C J Goodacre,et al.
The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns: Part 1.
,
1990,
The International journal of prosthodontics.
[7]
Ferracane Jl,et al.
Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite.
,
1998
.
[8]
M. Könönen,et al.
A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults.
,
1993,
Scandinavian journal of dental research.
[9]
A. Schulman,et al.
A compressive strength study of an all-ceramic crown.
,
1985,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.