What Does 2‐Dimensional Imaging Add to 3‐ and 4‐Dimensional Obstetric Ultrasonography?

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 2‐dimensional (2D) ultrasonography adds diagnostic information to that provided by the examination of 3‐dimensional/4‐dimensional (3D/4D) volume data sets alone. Methods. Ninety‐nine fetuses were examined by 3D/4D volume ultrasonography. Volume data sets were evaluated by a blinded independent examiner who, after establishing an initial diagnostic impression by 3D/4D ultrasonography, performed a 2D ultrasonographic examination. The frequency of agreement and diagnostic accuracy of each modality to detect congenital anomalies were calculated and compared. Results. Fifty‐four fetuses with no abnormalities and 45 fetuses with 82 anomalies diagnosed by 2D ultrasonography were examined. Agreement between 3D/4D and 2D ultrasonography occurred for 90.4% of the findings (123/136; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.834; 95% confidence interval, 0.774–0.879). Six anomalies were missed by 3D/4D ultrasonography when compared to 2D ultrasonography (ventricular septal defect [n = 2], interrupted inferior vena cava with azygous continuation [n = 1], tetralogy of Fallot [n = 1], horseshoe kidney [n = 1], and cystic adenomatoid malformation [n = 1]). There were 2 discordant diagnoses: transposition of the great arteries diagnosed as a double‐outlet right ventricle and pulmonary atresia misinterpreted as tricuspid atresia on 3D/4D ultrasonography. One case of occult spinal dysraphism was suspected on 3D ultrasonography but not confirmed by 2D ultrasonography. When compared to diagnoses performed after delivery (n = 106), the sensitivity and specificity of 3D/4D ultrasonography (92.2% [47/51] and 76.4% [42/55], respectively) and 2D ultrasonography (96.1% [49/51] and 72.7% [40/55]) were not significantly different (P = .233). Conclusions. Information provided by 2D ultrasonography is consistent, in most cases, with information provided by the examination of 3D/4D volume data sets alone.

[1]  Hui-Xiong Xu,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in evaluating fetal malformations. , 2002, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[2]  S. Hughes,et al.  Volume estimation from multiplanar 2D ultrasound images using a remote electromagnetic position and orientation sensor. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  D. Jurkovic,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two‐dimensional sonography , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  T. Nelson,et al.  Real‐time three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography: initial feasibility study. , 1999, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  L. Platt,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology: preliminary experience. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  F Viñals,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease using four‐dimensional spatio‐temporal image correlation (STIC) telemedicine via an Internet link: a pilot study , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  R. Axt‐Fliedner,et al.  Isolated ventricular septal defects detected by color Doppler imaging: evolution during fetal and first year of postnatal life , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  T R Nelson,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  J. Brinkley,et al.  Fetal weight estimation from ultrasonic three-dimensional head and trunk reconstructions: evaluation in vitro. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  E Merz,et al.  Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  A. Staudach,et al.  First trimester three-dimensional ultrasound volumetry of the gestational sac , 1994, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[12]  T R Nelson,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound: Display modalities in obstetrics , 1997, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[13]  G. Kossoff Three‐dimensional ultrasound – technology push or market pull? , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  Thomas D Shipp,et al.  Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[15]  Alexander Scharf,et al.  Evaluation of Two-Dimensional versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetric Diagnostics: A Prospective Study , 2001, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[16]  D. Economides,et al.  Detailed three‐dimensional fetal echocardiography facilitated by an Internet link , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  Thomas D Shipp,et al.  How Sonographic Tomography Will Change the Face of Obstetric Sonography , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[18]  T. Nelson,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Ultrasound of the Fetal Spine , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  M. Treadwell,et al.  Four‐Dimensional Ultrasonography of the Fetal Heart Using Color Doppler Spatiotemporal Image Correlation , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[20]  R. Favre,et al.  Measurement of limb circumferences with three‐dimensional ultrasound for fetal weight estimation , 1993, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  K. Baba,et al.  Fetal abnormalities: evaluation with real-time-processible three-dimensional US--preliminary report. , 1999, Radiology.

[22]  O H Gilja,et al.  Measurements of organ volume by ultrasonography , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[23]  U. Hamper,et al.  Three-dimensional US: preliminary clinical experience. , 1994, Radiology.

[24]  T R Nelson,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. , 2001, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[25]  C. Nappi,et al.  Characterization and natural history of ventricular septal defects in the fetus , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[26]  E Merz,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasonography in prenatal diagnosis , 1995, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[27]  Peter Falkensammer,et al.  Four-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal heart with spatiotemporal image correlation. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  J. Grotepass,et al.  [Clinical application of 3-dimensional ultrasound display. Initial results]. , 2008, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.

[29]  T. Nelson,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[30]  A. Scharf,et al.  3D Real-Time Imaging of the Fetal Heart , 2000, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[31]  Dev Maulik,et al.  Live Three‐Dimensional Echocardiography of the Human Fetus , 2003, Echocardiography.

[32]  T R Nelson,et al.  Feasibility of performing a virtual patient examination using three‐dimensional ultrasonographic data acquired at remote locations. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[33]  E. Merz,et al.  2D and 3D Ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal anatomy in the second and third trimesters in a level III center. , 2005, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[34]  Jing Deng,et al.  Real-time three-dimensional fetal echocardiography--optimal imaging windows. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.