Political accountability and autonomous weapons

Autonomous weapons would have the capacity to select and attack targets without direct human input. One important objection to the introduction of such weapons is that they will make it more difficult to identify and hold accountable those responsible for undesirable outcomes such as mission failures and civilian casualties. I hypothesize that individuals can modify their attribution of responsibility in predicable ways to accommodate this new technology. The results of a survey experiment are consistent with this; subjects continue to find responsible and hold accountable political and military leaders when autonomous weapons are used, but also attribute responsibility to the designers and programmers of such weapons.

[1]  Brad T. Gomez,et al.  Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution , 2001 .

[2]  Denise Garcia,et al.  Killer Robots: Why the US should Lead the Ban , 2015 .

[3]  Markus Wagner,et al.  The Dehumanization of International Humanitarian Law: Legal, Ethical, and Political Implications of Autonomous Weapon Systems , 2014 .

[4]  Guy D. Whitten,et al.  A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context , 1993 .

[5]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. , 1990 .

[6]  M. Hewstone Causal Attribution: From Cognitive Processes to Collective Beliefs , 1989 .

[7]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  FOREIGN POLICY AND THE ELECTORAL CONNECTION , 2006 .

[8]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Who Sees Human? , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  Marcus Schulzke,et al.  Autonomous Weapons and Distributed Responsibility , 2013 .

[10]  M. Peffley The voter as juror: Attributing responsibility for economic conditions , 1984 .

[11]  K. Mcgraw Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications , 1990, British Journal of Political Science.

[12]  Alston Philip,et al.  Report of the Special Rapporteur on extra judicial, summary or arbitrary executions , 2017 .

[13]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Mass Public Decisions on Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Andreas Matthias,et al.  The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[16]  K. Mcgraw Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[17]  H. Kelman,et al.  Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. , 1990 .

[18]  Sarah E. Kreps,et al.  Elite Consensus as a Determinant of Alliance Cohesion: Why Public Opinion Hardly Matters for NATO-led Operations in Afghanistan , 2010 .

[19]  W. Przepiorka,et al.  Responsibility Attribution for Collective Decision Makers , 2011 .