Routine follow up of major trauma patients from trauma registries: What are the outcomes?

BACKGROUND Routine measurement of outcomes other than mortality in trauma is needed to monitor trauma care, benchmark trauma hospitals and systems, and to guide resource provision. Trauma registries are ideally placed to capture morbidity outcomes such as functional loss, disability, and handicap. This study aimed to provide a broad description of the 6-month outcomes of major trauma patients captured by a population-based trauma registry, establish the follow-up rate of registry patients, and determine any biases associated with loss to follow up. METHODS The Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) is a population-based registry in Victoria, Australia. Major trauma patients captured by the VSTR with a date of injury from October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004 were followed up at 6 months postinjury by telephone to collect information about their living status, functional levels, and return to work. RESULTS Of the 1,102 eligible patients, 67% were successfully followed up at 6 months postinjury. Eighteen patients had died since discharge. Patients lost to follow up were less severely injured (p = 0.004) and younger (p = 0.010) at baseline than those followed up. The vast majority of major trauma patients are independent with respect to locomotion (78%), feeding (93%), and expression (93%) by 6 months postinjury. Of those working before injury, 60% had returned to work. CONCLUSIONS The findings show that follow up of registry patients is feasible, results in few biases in the follow-up population, and reports similar findings to individual studies of trauma populations.

[1]  Peter Rhee,et al.  The Effect of Trauma Center Designation and Trauma Volume on Outcome in Specific Severe Injuries , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[2]  B. Gabbe,et al.  Predictors of mortality, length of stay and discharge destination in blunt trauma , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[3]  T. Kossmann.  The need to move on from mortality to morbidity outcome predictions , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[4]  B. Gabbe,et al.  Choosing outcome assessment instruments for trauma registries. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  T. Häggmark,et al.  Outcome and quality of life 5 years after major trauma. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  D. Alexander,et al.  Recovery after musculoskeletal trauma in men and women. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Stephen Luchter,et al.  Validating the functional capacity index: a comparison of predicted versus observed total body scores. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Prevalence and determinants of disabilities and return to work after major trauma. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  J. McNeil,et al.  The trauma registry as a statewide quality improvement tool. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Caroline F Finch,et al.  Developing Australia's first statewide trauma registry: what are the lessons? , 2004, ANZ journal of surgery.

[11]  Jack V Tu,et al.  Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Hoyt,et al.  The impact of major trauma: quality-of-life outcomes are worse in women than in men, independent of mechanism and injury severity. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  S. Dirusso,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: increased mortality and worse functional outcome at discharge despite lower injury severity. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  D. Kauder,et al.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Serious Traumatic Injury in Older Adults , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  B Bouillon,et al.  Quality of life in patients with multiple injuries--basic issues, assessment, and recommendations. , 2002, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[16]  M. Bullinger,et al.  Quality of life after multiple trauma--summary and recommendations of the consensus conference. , 2002, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[17]  M. O’Sullivan,et al.  Outcome after musculoskeletal trauma treated in a regional hospital. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  J. Currens.  Evaluation of disability and handicap following injury. , 2000 .

[19]  J. A. Baldry Currens,et al.  The timing of disability measurements following injury. , 2000, Injury.

[20]  W. Long,et al.  Outcome from injury: general health, work status, and satisfaction 12 months after trauma. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  J P Anderson,et al.  Outcome after major trauma: discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. , 1998, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  D. Hoyt,et al.  Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. , 1998 .

[23]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Long-term outcomes in blunt trauma: who goes back to work? , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[24]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  The development of the Functional Capacity Index. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[25]  R. Rutledge.  The goals, development, and use of trauma registries and trauma data sources in decision making in injury. , 1995, The Surgical clinics of North America.