Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing

Although the cochlear implant is already the world's most successful neural prosthesis, opportunities for further improvement abound. Promising areas of current research include work on improving the biological infrastructure in the implanted cochlea to optimize reception of cochlear implant stimulation and on designing the pattern of electrical stimulation to take maximal advantage of conditions in the implanted cochlea. In this review we summarize what is currently known about conditions in the cochlea of deaf, implanted humans and then review recent work from our animal laboratory investigating the effects of preserving or reinnervating tissues on psychophysical and electrophysiological measures of implant function. Additionally we review work from our human laboratory on optimizing the pattern of electrical stimulation to better utilize strengths in the cochlear infrastructure. Histological studies of human temporal bones from implant users and from people who would have been candidates for implants show a range of pathologic conditions including spiral ganglion cell counts ranging from approximately 2% to 92% of normal and partial hair cell survival in some cases. To duplicate these conditions in a guinea pig model, we use a variety of deafening and implantation procedures as well as post-deafening therapies designed to protect neurons and/or regenerate neurites. Across populations of human patients, relationships between nerve survival and functional measures such as speech have been difficult to demonstrate, possibly due to the numerous subject variables that can affect implant function and the elapsed time between functional measures and postmortem histology. However, psychophysical studies across stimulation sites within individual human subjects suggest that biological conditions near the implanted electrodes contribute significantly to implant function, and this is supported by studies in animal models comparing histological findings to psychophysical and electrophysiological data. Results of these studies support the efforts to improve the biological infrastructure in the implanted ear and guide strategies which optimize stimulation patterns to match patient-specific conditions in the cochlea.

[1]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  A. Wise,et al.  Effects of localized neurotrophin gene expression on spiral ganglion neuron resprouting in the deafened cochlea. , 2010, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[3]  J. Nadol,et al.  Correlation of Acoustic Threshold Measures and Spiral Ganglion Cell Survival in Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 1998, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[4]  Soha N. Garadat,et al.  Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users , 2011, Hearing Research.

[5]  J. Nadol,et al.  Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  J. Fayad,et al.  Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Relation of Histopathology to Performance , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Asynchronous neural activity recorded from the round window. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  G S Donaldson,et al.  Psychometric functions and temporal integration in electric hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Bredberg,et al.  Protection and Regrowth of the Auditory Nerve after Deafness: Neurotrophins, Antioxidants and Depolarization Are Effective in vivo , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H. Versnel,et al.  Morphological changes in spiral ganglion cells after intracochlear application of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in deafened guinea pigs , 2008, Hearing Research.

[14]  J. E. Hawkins,et al.  A direct approach to cochlear anatomy and pathology in man. , 1967, Archives of otolaryngology.

[15]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  The Relationship Between Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Perception: A Study in Cochlear Implant Users With Short Electrode Array , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  J. Nadol,et al.  Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  P. R. Thorne,et al.  Ensemble spontaneous activity in the guinea-pig cochlear nerve , 2004, Hearing Research.

[18]  William C. Stebbins,et al.  Animal Psychophysics: the design and conduct of sensory experiments , 1970, Springer US.

[19]  H. Spoendlin.  The organization of the cochlear receptor. , 1966, Fortschritte der Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde.

[20]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Y. Raphael,et al.  Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig , 1997, Hearing Research.

[22]  Y. Raphael,et al.  Effects of Hearing Preservation on Psychophysical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  H. Schuknecht,et al.  Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. , 1978, The Laryngoscope.

[24]  T. Stöver,et al.  Effects of delayed treatment with combined GDNF and continuous electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cell survival in deafened guinea pigs , 2009, Journal of neuroscience research.

[25]  J. Fayad,et al.  Histopathologic Assessment of Fibrosis and nEw Bone Formation in Implanted Human Temporal Bones Using 3D Reconstruction , 2009, Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery.

[26]  L. Johnsson,et al.  Sequence of Degeneration of Corti's Organ and its First-Order Neurons , 1974, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[27]  A. Wise,et al.  Resprouting and survival of guinea pig cochlear neurons in response to the administration of the neurotrophins brain‐derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin‐3 , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds , 2008, Hearing Research.

[29]  F. B. Simmons,et al.  Estimating Eighth Nerve Survival by Electrical Stimulation , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[30]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Effects of Stimulation Rate, Mode and Level on Modulation Detection by Cochlear Implant Users , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[31]  R. Hall,et al.  Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response , 1990, Hearing Research.

[32]  Schuknecht Hf.  Lesions of the organ of Corti. , 1953 .

[33]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Residual Spiral Ganglion Cell Count as Determined by Comparison with the Contralateral Nonimplanted Inner Ear in Humans , 2005, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[34]  Bryan E Pfingst.  Effects of electrode configuration on cochlear implant modulation detection thresholds. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Penetrating multichannel stimulation and recording electrodes in auditory prosthesis research , 2008, Hearing Research.

[36]  Speech recognition in noise , 2011 .

[37]  Bryan E. Pfingst,et al.  Across-Site Variation in Detection Thresholds and Maximum Comfortable Loudness Levels for Cochlear Implants , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[38]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Histopathology of Cochlear Implants in Humans , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[39]  H. Schuknecht.  Lesions of the organ of Corti. , 1953, Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[40]  Y. Raphael,et al.  Transgenic BDNF induces nerve fiber regrowth into the auditory epithelium in deaf cochleae , 2010, Experimental Neurology.

[41]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  S. Cannon,et al.  Evaluation of Eighth Nerve Integrity by the Electrically Evoked Middle Latency Response , 1989, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[44]  F. O. Black,et al.  Aminoglycoside-induced cochlear pathology in man. , 1981, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[45]  R Hinojosa,et al.  HISTOPATHOLOGY OF PROFOUND SENSORINEURAL DEAFNESS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Molly Webster,et al.  Spiral ganglion neuron loss following organ of corti loss: A quantitative study , 1981, Brain Research.

[47]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment , 2003, Hearing Research.

[48]  Y. Raphael,et al.  Nerve maintenance and regeneration in the damaged cochlea , 2011, Hearing Research.

[49]  Y. Raphael,et al.  Over-expression of BDNF by adenovirus with concurrent electrical stimulation improves cochlear implant thresholds and survival of auditory neurons , 2008, Hearing Research.

[50]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  G M Clark,et al.  Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[52]  K. Wise,et al.  High-density cochlear implants with position sensing and control , 2008, Hearing Research.

[53]  J. Nadol,et al.  Patterns of degeneration in the human cochlear nerve , 1995, Hearing Research.