Modeling and simulation of bridge-section buffeting response in turbulent flow
暂无分享,去创建一个
Yuri Bazilevs | Tore Andreas Helgedagsrud | Kjell Magne Mathisen | Jinhui Yan | Ole A. Øseth | Y. Bazilevs | Jinhui Yan | K. Mathisen | T. A. Helgedagsrud
[1] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. Computational and experimental investigation of free vibration and flutter of bridge decks , 2018, Computational Mechanics.
[2] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. CHALLENGES AND DIRECTIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID–STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 2013 .
[3] G. Hulbert,et al. A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method , 2000 .
[4] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. SPACE–TIME FLUID–STRUCTURE INTERACTION METHODS , 2012 .
[5] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. FSI modeling of the reefed stages and disreefing of the Orion spacecraft parachutes , 2014 .
[6] Giorgio Diana,et al. Wind tunnel tests and numerical approach for long span bridges: the Messina bridge , 2013 .
[7] D. Spalding. A Single Formula for the “Law of the Wall” , 1961 .
[8] Allan Larsen,et al. On estimating the aerodynamic admittance of bridge sections by a mesh-free vortex method , 2015 .
[9] Kai-Uwe Bletzinger,et al. Bridge flutter derivatives based on computed, validated pressure fields , 2012 .
[10] W. H. Melbourne,et al. The aerodynamic admittance of two-dimensional rectangular section cylinders in smooth flow , 1986 .
[11] Roberto Scotta,et al. Numerical wind tunnel for aerodynamic and aeroelastic characterization of bridge deck sections , 2016 .
[12] Kenji Takizawa,et al. Space–time computational analysis of MAV flapping-wing aerodynamics with wing clapping , 2015 .
[13] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Multiscale space-time methods for thermo-fluid analysis of a ground vehicle and its tires , 2015 .
[14] Ahsan Kareem,et al. Advances in modeling of Aerodynamic forces on bridge decks , 2002 .
[15] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Special methods for aerodynamic-moment calculations from parachute FSI modeling , 2015 .
[16] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics , 2014 .
[17] A. Kareem,et al. TIME DOMAIN FLUTTER AND BUFFETING RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES , 1999 .
[18] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Stabilization and discontinuity-capturing parameters for space–time flow computations with finite element and isogeometric discretizations , 2018 .
[19] J. Frandsen. Numerical bridge deck studies using finite elements. Part I: flutter , 2004 .
[20] T. Hughes,et al. Isogeometric variational multiscale modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows with weakly enforced boundary conditions on unstretched meshes , 2010 .
[21] J. Kaimal,et al. Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence , 1972 .
[22] Hitoshi Hattori,et al. Space–time VMS method for flow computations with slip interfaces (ST-SI) , 2015 .
[23] Kenji Takizawa,et al. Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space–time methods , 2014 .
[24] A. Korobenko,et al. FSI Simulation of two back-to-back wind turbines in atmospheric boundary layer flow , 2017 .
[25] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. ALE-VMS AND ST-VMS METHODS FOR COMPUTER MODELING OF WIND-TURBINE ROTOR AERODYNAMICS AND FLUID–STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 2012 .
[26] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. The multi-domain method for computation of the aerodynamics of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft , 2001 .
[27] John Sheridan,et al. Response of base suction and vortex shedding from rectangular prisms to transverse forcing , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[28] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Ram-air parachute structural and fluid mechanics computations with the Space-Time Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA) , 2016 .
[29] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. FSI modeling of the Orion spacecraft drogue parachutes , 2015 .
[30] R. B. Dean. Reynolds Number Dependence of Skin Friction and Other Bulk Flow Variables in Two-Dimensional Rectangular Duct Flow , 1978 .
[31] I. Akkerman,et al. Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor-Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual-based variational multiscale method , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..
[32] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Space–Time method for flow computations with slip interfaces and topology changes (ST-SI-TC) , 2016 .
[33] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Space–time fluid mechanics computation of heart valve models , 2014 .
[34] Shaopeng Li,et al. Aerodynamic admittance of streamlined bridge decks , 2018 .
[35] Kenji Takizawa,et al. Computational thermo-fluid analysis of a disk brake , 2016 .
[36] Javier Jiménez,et al. Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to Reτ=2003 , 2006 .
[37] Victor M. Calo,et al. Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flow simulations at small time steps , 2010 .
[38] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Aorta flow analysis and heart valve flow and structure analysis , 2018 .
[39] Xiaowei Deng,et al. Free-surface flow modeling and simulation of horizontal-axis tidal-stream turbines , 2017 .
[40] Nicholas P. Jones,et al. COUPLED FLUTTER AND BUFFETING ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN BRIDGES , 1996 .
[41] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Heart Valve Flow Computation with the Space–Time Slip Interface Topology Change (ST-SI-TC) Method and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) , 2018 .
[42] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE–VMS: validation and the role of weakly enforced boundary conditions , 2012, Computational Mechanics.
[43] Vipin Kumar,et al. A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..
[44] T. Hughes,et al. Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .
[45] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Space–Time Computational Analysis of Tire Aerodynamics with Actual Geometry, Road Contact, and Tire Deformation , 2018 .
[46] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. Engineering Analysis and Design with ALE-VMS and Space–Time Methods , 2014, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
[47] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Multiscale methods for gore curvature calculations from FSI modeling of spacecraft parachutes , 2014 .
[48] Jintai Chung,et al. A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .
[49] A. Korobenko,et al. A new variational multiscale formulation for stratified incompressible turbulent flows , 2017 .
[50] H. Tanaka,et al. New Estimation Method of Aerodynamic Admittance Function , 2001 .
[51] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Finite element stabilization parameters computed from element matrices and vectors , 2000 .
[52] Robert H. Scanlan,et al. The action of flexible bridges under wind, II: Buffeting theory , 1978 .
[53] W. Sears,et al. Some Aspects of Non-Stationary Airfoil Theory and Its Practical Application , 1941 .
[54] Lin Zhao,et al. Cross-spectral recognition method of bridge deck aerodynamic admittance function , 2015, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.
[55] Allan Larsen,et al. Discrete vortex method simulations of the aerodynamic admittance in bridge aerodynamics , 2010 .
[56] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Heart valve flow computation with the integrated Space–Time VMS, Slip Interface, Topology Change and Isogeometric Discretization methods , 2017 .
[57] Robert H. Scanlan,et al. Problematics in Formulation of Wind‐Force Models for Bridge Decks , 1993 .
[58] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Multi-domain parallel computation of wake flows , 1999 .
[59] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Fluid-structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft , 2001 .
[60] Allan Larsen,et al. Discrete vortex simulation of flow around five generic bridge deck sections , 1998 .
[61] Ledong Zhu,et al. Identification and application of six-component aerodynamic admittance functions of a closed-box bridge deck , 2018 .
[62] Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al. Simplified prediction of wind-induced response and stability limit of slender long-span suspension bridges, based on modified quasi-steady theory: A case study , 2010 .
[63] Kenji Takizawa,et al. FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta , 2014 .
[64] G. L Larose,et al. Experimental Determination of the Aerodynamic Admittance of a Bridge Deck Segment , 1999 .
[65] Francesco Ubertini,et al. On the identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks via RANS turbulence models: Benchmarking on rectangular prisms , 2014 .
[66] R. Sankaran,et al. Direct measurement of the aerodynamic admittance of two-dimensional rectangular cylinders in smooth and turbulent flows , 1992 .
[67] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. Isogeometric divergence-conforming variational multiscale formulation of incompressible turbulent flows , 2017 .
[68] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. Computation of the Flow Over a Sphere at Re = 3700: A Comparison of Uniform and Turbulent Inflow Conditions , 2014 .
[69] Ahsan Kareem,et al. Advanced Structural Wind Engineering , 2013 .
[70] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. A Geometrical-Characteristics Study in Patient-Specific FSI Analysis of Blood Flow in the Thoracic Aorta , 2016 .
[71] L. Patruno,et al. Accuracy of numerically evaluated flutter derivatives of bridge deck sections using RANS: Effects on the flutter onset velocity , 2015 .
[72] Francesco Ubertini,et al. On the evaluation of bridge deck flutter derivatives using RANS turbulence models , 2013 .
[73] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. New Directions in Space–Time Computational Methods , 2016 .
[74] T. Hughes,et al. Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations , 2008 .
[75] T. Tezduyar. Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters , 2003 .
[76] E. Morfiadakis,et al. The suitability of the von Karman spectrum for the structure of turbulence in a complex terrain wind farm , 1996 .
[77] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. Isogeometric Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Moving-Domain Bridge Aerodynamics , 2019, Journal of Engineering Mechanics.
[78] D. E. Walshe,et al. Measurement and application of the aerodynamic admittance function for a box-girder bridge , 1983 .
[79] Yuguang Bai,et al. Three dimensional numerical simulations of long-span bridge aerodynamics, using block-iterative coupling and DES , 2010 .
[80] John Kim,et al. DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOWS UP TO RE=590 , 1999 .
[81] Guy L. Larose,et al. Direct measurements of buffeting wind forces on bridge decks , 1998 .
[82] Hitoshi Hattori,et al. Computational analysis of flow-driven string dynamics in turbomachinery , 2017 .
[83] Richard G. J. Flay,et al. Identification of aerodynamic admittance functions of a flat closed-box deck in different grid-generated turbulent wind fields , 2018 .
[84] Stephen B. Pope. Turbulent Flows: Wall flows , 2000 .
[85] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. Experimental and numerical FSI study of compliant hydrofoils , 2015 .
[86] Stephen B. Pope. Turbulent Flows: The scales of turbulent motion , 2000 .
[87] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Space–time VMS computational flow analysis with isogeometric discretization and a general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method , 2017 .
[88] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. A General-Purpose NURBS Mesh Generation Method for Complex Geometries , 2018 .
[89] Robert H. Scanlan,et al. The action of flexible bridges under wind, I: Flutter theory† , 1978 .
[90] A. Kareem,et al. AERODYNAMIC COUPLING EFFECTS ON FLUTTER AND BUFFETING OF BRIDGES , 2000 .
[91] Kenji Takizawa,et al. Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC) , 2014 .
[92] A. Korobenko,et al. Computational free-surface fluid–structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines , 2016 .
[93] J. Mann,et al. Gust loading on streamlined bridge decks , 1998 .
[94] T. Hughes,et al. Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows , 2007 .
[95] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Multiscale space–time fluid–structure interaction techniques , 2011 .
[96] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV , 2014 .
[97] Takanori Ikeda,et al. Prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of a box girder bridge section using the LES turbulence model , 2008 .
[98] A. Korobenko,et al. FSI modeling of a propulsion system based on compliant hydrofoils in a tandem configuration , 2016 .
[99] Victor M. Calo,et al. Weak Dirichlet Boundary Conditions for Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows , 2007 .
[100] Hitoshi Hattori,et al. Turbocharger flow computations with the Space-Time Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA) , 2017 .
[101] Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al. Porosity models and computational methods for compressible-flow aerodynamics of parachutes with geometric porosity , 2017 .
[102] Kenji Takizawa,et al. Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity , 2013 .
[103] Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al. Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics , 2007 .
[104] Yuri Bazilevs,et al. New directions and challenging computations in fluid dynamics modeling with stabilized and multiscale methods , 2015 .