Identifying design glitches through automated design analysis

Engineers have developed a number of design techniques in order to detect problems in their designs, such as yellow-boarding, FMECA, FTA and sneak circuit analysis. Concurrent engineering demands that all such design analysis activities are carried out in a timely manner-instantaneously would be ideal. For electrical systems incorporating some electronics, many such techniques can be automated using qualitative simulation to generate appropriate results. There are two main advantages of using qualitative simulation over using numerical simulation in tools such as SPICE or SABER. The first advantage is that the analysis can be performed early in the design lifecycle, identifying problems when it is less costly to fix them. The second advantage is that component models are easy to specify and are highly reusable when compared with models built in SPICE or SABER.

[1]  Chris Price,et al.  FMEA for multiple failures , 1998, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity.

[2]  Myra S. Wilson,et al.  Combining functional and structural reasoning for safety analysis of electrical designs , 1997, Knowl. Eng. Rev..

[3]  Neal Snooke,et al.  Automated sneak identification , 1996 .

[4]  Chris Price Effortless incremental design FMEA , 1996, Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[5]  Chris J. Price,et al.  Function-directed electrical design analysis , 1998, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[6]  J. B. Bowles,et al.  Combining sneak circuit analysis and failure modes and effects analysis , 1993, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1993 Proceedings.

[7]  Chris J. Price,et al.  Multiple Fault Diagnosis from FMEA , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Chris Price,et al.  The Flame system: automating electrical failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) , 1995, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings.