Utility of cardiac MRI in the assessment of myocardial viability: Evaluating its role using 3-T machine in correlation with SPECT

Abstract Background Assessment of viable myocardium has important prognostic value in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to compare 3 T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods Thirty-three patients with coronary artery disease were involved in this study. All patients were examined using coronary angiography to determine the degree of the coronary artery disease. Then, they underwent 3 T CMR examination, after administration of intravenous gadolinium and the segmental extent of myocardial enhancement was determined, followed by SPECT evaluation. Comparison of myocardial viability was performed in 99 coronary territories. Results Agreement between two modalities was obtained in 88 segments (88.9%), resulting in a kappa value of 0.725. In 99 segments, we had eleven discordant results. Eleven SPECT viable segments were non-viable according to CMR. Conclusion SPECT was comparable to 3 T CMR for myocardial viability assessment, C-MRI detected more non-viable segments with high definition to the thickness of the myocardial scar tissue than the SPECT.

[1]  R. Kim,et al.  Performance of Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadoversetamide Contrast for the Detection and Assessment of Myocardial Infarction: An International, Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[2]  R. Kim,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  L. Shaw,et al.  Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  C. Claussen,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Delayed Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Charles Davidson,et al.  Correspondence between the 17-segment model and coronary arterial anatomy using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  R. Kim,et al.  Visualization of Discrete Microinfarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Associated With Mild Creatine Kinase-MB Elevation , 2001, Circulation.

[7]  Richard D. White,et al.  Nonstress delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging of the myocardium predicts improvement of function after revascularization for chronic ischemic heart disease with left ventricular dysfunction. , 2003, American heart journal.

[8]  S. Dymarkowski,et al.  Clinical cardiac MRI , 2005 .

[9]  R. Gropler,et al.  Journey to find the ideal PET flow tracer for clinical use: Are we there yet? , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  R C Hendel Attenuation correction: eternal dilemma or real improvement? , 2005, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[11]  Hani A Nabi,et al.  Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: basic principles, technical aspects, and clinical applications. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[12]  H. Kestler,et al.  Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, European heart journal.

[13]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study , 2003, The Lancet.

[14]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionucl , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Microvascular obstruction and left ventricular remodeling early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  R O Bonow,et al.  Current Diagnostic Techniques of Assessing Myocardial Viabilit in Patients With Hibernating and Stunned Myocardium , 1993, Circulation.

[17]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionucl , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.