The Influence of Privacy Dispositions on Perceptions of Information Transparency and Personalization Preferences

To attract customers, firms offer personalized services. This is perceived beneficial by many customers as it enhances the purchase experience and addresses customers’ needs. However, to offer personalized services, customer data has to be collected and analyzed. This practice gives rise to privacy concerns and can inhibit the usage of such services. Our research aims to address the tension between personalization and privacy by applying information boundary theory to investigate how respondents’ disposition to value privacy and the availability of information transparency features influences individuals’ intention to disclose information to personalized services. Based on an experimental study, we find a significant interaction between disposition to value privacy and personalization, while the implementation of transparency features does not yield substantial changes in information disclosure. Thus, in order to successfully offer personalized services, we recommend that practitioners take individuals’ privacy preferences into account for their service design.

[1]  Miriam J. Metzger Communication Privacy Management in Electronic Commerce , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Shivendu Shivendu,et al.  An Economic Model of Privacy: A Property Rights Approach to Regulatory Choices for Online Personalization , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Heng Xu,et al.  Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2011, MIS Q..

[5]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[6]  Rahul Telang,et al.  What's in a "Name"? Impact of Use of Customer Information in E-Mail Advertisements , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Ting Li,et al.  Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  John Leubsdorf,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[9]  Neil Malhotra,et al.  Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys , 2008 .

[10]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  The Value of Privacy Assurance: An Exploratory Field Experiment , 2007, MIS Q..

[11]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[13]  Daniel R. Horne,et al.  The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors , 2007 .

[14]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study , 2011, WEIS.

[15]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Addressing the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Assessment from a Field Experiment on Smartphone Users , 2013, MIS Q..

[16]  Sriram Thirumalai,et al.  To Personalize or Not to Personalize Online Purchase Interactions: Implications of Self-Selection by Retailers , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Horst Treiblmaier,et al.  Users' Perceptions of Benefits and Costs of Personalization , 2007 .

[18]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[19]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Opportunities and challenges of mobile personalization: An exploratory study , 2009, ECIS.

[20]  Jeffrey T. Child,et al.  Blogging, communication, and privacy management: Development of the Blogging Privacy Management Measure , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Ramnath K. Chellappa,et al.  Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma , 2005, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[22]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization , 2006, MIS Q..

[23]  Keng Siau,et al.  An Experimental Study on Ubiquitous commerce Adoption: Impact of Personalization and Privacy Concerns , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics , 2017 .

[25]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[26]  Yi-Cheng Ku,et al.  Personalized Content Recommendation and User Satisfaction: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Findings , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Heng Xu,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Trichy V. Krishnan,et al.  The impact of consumer Internet experience on channel preference and usage intentions across the different stages of the buying process , 2007 .

[29]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  S. Petronio Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[31]  Varun Grover,et al.  Knowing your customers: Using a reciprocal relationship to enhance voluntary information disclosure , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance - An empirical investigation , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  R. Bies,et al.  Consumer Privacy: Balancing Economic and Justice Considerations , 2003 .

[36]  Yuan Li,et al.  The impact of disposition to privacy, website reputation and website familiarity on information privacy concerns , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[37]  Yuan Li,et al.  Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Graham J Hole,et al.  How to Design and Report Experiments , 2002 .

[39]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Strangers on a Plane: Context-Dependent Willingness to Divulge Sensitive Information , 2011 .

[40]  J CulnanMary,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust , 1999 .

[41]  David J. Danelski,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[42]  S. Petronio Communication Boundary Management: A Theoretical Model of Managing Disclosure of Private Information Between Marital Couples , 1991 .

[43]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..