Students' Learning Behavior, Motivation and Critical Thinking in Learning Management Systems.

Computer mediated communication (CMC) offers new opportunities for learners to create communities of inquiry that allow for more active learning. This paper reports on the use of a Learning Management System (LMS) as a tool to facilitate students' writing and critical thinking skills. The primary data for the study came from students' online learning records and from discussion forum postings in the LMS. It was found that students' motivation to learn was at a high level. Most importantly, student motivation was positively correlated with their learning behavior. Although male and female students did not differ in their motivation and learning behavior, messages in the writing forum indicated that female students had higher critical thinking skills than male students. " Explaining " messages appeared the most often, while " interpreting " messages appeared the least. The process of text-based online discussion in the forum had the potential to enhance the students' writing skills, encourage their critical thinking, and help them write more systematically. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation , 2006 .

[2]  Vance A. Durrington,et al.  Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Relationship between Students' Motivation and Their Participation in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2022 .

[3]  James Laffey,et al.  Exploring the relationships between students' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Bryan Smith Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[5]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Hilda R. Glazer,et al.  Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  A. Artino,et al.  Promoting Academic Motivation and Self-Regulation: Practical Guidelines for Online Instructors , 2008 .

[8]  Maki Hirotani Synchronous Versus Asynchronous CMC and Transfer to Japanese Oral Performance , 2013 .

[9]  Daniel DeNeui,et al.  Asynchronous Learning Networks and Student Outcomes: The Utility of Online Learning Components in Hybrid Courses , 2006 .

[10]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Why Students Contribute in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2008 .

[11]  Karen Swan,et al.  Shaping Online Discussion: Assessment Matters , 2007 .

[12]  J. Reeve,et al.  Understanding motivation and emotion , 1991 .

[13]  Michael Spaulding Perceptions of Academic Honesty in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classrooms , 2009 .

[14]  Bruce W. Tuckman,et al.  The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Hua Bai,et al.  Facilitating Students ’ Critical Thinking in Online Discussion : An Instructor ’ s Experience , 2009 .

[16]  Linda Elder,et al.  The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts & Tools , 2009 .

[17]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[19]  Seung Youn Chyung,et al.  Invisible Motivation of Online Adult Learners during Contract Learning. , 2007 .