Incorporating Path Dependency into Decision-Analytic Methods: An Application to Global Climate-Change Policy

Climate policy decisions are necessarily sequential decisions over time under uncertainty, given the magnitude of uncertainty in both economic and scientific processes, the decades-to-centuries time scale of the phenomenon, and the ability to reduce uncertainty and revise decisions along the way. Thus, an appropriate choice of analytical method is decision analysis. However, applying decision analysis in the context of idealized government decision makers over a century raises the question of how to deal with the fact that political systems tend to exhibit path dependency, a force that makes large policy shifts difficult and rare, and limits most decisions to small incremental changes. This paper explores the effect of considering path dependency in an application of decision analysis to climate-change policy decisions, presenting two alternative methods for modeling path dependency. I demonstrate that consideration of path dependence in the context of climate policy justifies greater near-term emissions reductions. The more general result of path-dependency is to shift the near-term strategy towards a more moderate hedging strategy, because drastic shifts later will be difficult.

[1]  M. Altman The Economics of Profitable Inefficiency and Market Failure , 2020, Worker Satisfaction and Economic Performance.

[2]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A flexible climate model for use in integrated assessments , 1998 .

[3]  M. Keyzer,et al.  Path-dependence in a Ramsey model with resource amenities and limited regeneration , 2004 .

[4]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  Hedging Derivative Securities and Incomplete Markets: An Formula-Arbitrage Approach , 2001, Oper. Res..

[5]  R. Putnam Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games , 1988, International Organization.

[6]  P. Pierson Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[7]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change , 1992, Nature.

[8]  Menner A. Tatang,et al.  An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models , 1997 .

[9]  Mort Webster,et al.  The Curious Role of “ Learning ” in Climate Policy : Should We Wait for More Data ? , 2000 .

[10]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Quasi-option value and climate policy choices , 1998 .

[11]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainties in Climate System Properties with the Use of Recent Climate Observations , 2002, Science.

[12]  A. Manne,et al.  Buying greenhouse insurance: The economics costs of carbon dioxide emission limits , 1992 .

[13]  T. Teisberg,et al.  CETA: A Model for Carbon Emissions Trajectory Assessment , 1992 .

[14]  Phil Dipietro,et al.  Analysis of GHG Abatement Opportunities under America’s Climate Security Act of 2007 , 2009 .

[15]  D. Reiner,et al.  The evolution of a climate regime: Kyoto to Marrakech , 2002 .

[16]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  When we don't know the costs or the benefits: Adaptive strategies for abating climate change , 1997 .

[17]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[18]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Integrated Global System Model for Climate Policy Assessment: Feedbacks and Sensitivity Studies , 1999 .

[19]  Charles D. Kolstad,et al.  Learning and Stock Effects in Environmental Regulation: The Case of Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1996 .

[20]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[21]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[22]  David L. Weimer,et al.  Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 4th Edition , 2005 .

[23]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  What is the Value of Scientific Knowledge? An Application to Global Warming Using the PRICE Model , 1997 .

[24]  Gary Yohe,et al.  To Hedge or Not Against an Uncertain Climate Future? , 2004, Science.

[25]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A Methodology for Quantifying Uncertainty in Climate Projections , 2000 .

[26]  Alistair Ulph,et al.  Global Warming, Irreversibility and Learning , 1997 .

[27]  D. Keefer,et al.  Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables , 1983 .

[28]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  CO2 Emissions Limits: Economic Adjustments and the Distribution of Burdens , 1997 .

[29]  C. Henry Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty: The "Irreversibility Effect." , 1974 .

[30]  William A. Pizer,et al.  The optimal choice of climate change policy in the presence of uncertainty , 1999 .

[31]  M. Sarofim,et al.  Uncertainty in emissions projections for climate models , 2002 .

[32]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  An Analysis of the European Emission Trading Scheme , 2005 .

[33]  H. J. Herzog,et al.  Representing Energy Technologies in Top-down Economic Models Using Bottom-up Information , 2002 .

[34]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  Subjective judgments by climate experts. , 1995 .

[35]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate change policy: quantifying uncertainties for damages and optimal carbon taxes , 1999 .

[36]  K. Arrow,et al.  Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility , 1974 .

[37]  D. Keefer Certainty Equivalents for Three-Point Discrete-Distribution Approximations , 1994 .

[38]  S. Shavell,et al.  On the Superiority of Corrective Taxes to Quantity Regulation , 1997 .

[39]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties using recent climate observations , 2001 .

[40]  E. M. Bailey,et al.  Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program , 2000 .

[41]  Fred Matthews,et al.  The historic turn in the human sciences , 1998 .

[42]  W. Nordhaus Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change , 1994 .

[43]  John M. Reilly,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol and non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sinks , 2002 .

[44]  S. Alam,et al.  Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1993 .

[45]  Avinash Dixit,et al.  Analytical Approximations in Models of Hysteresis , 1991 .

[46]  Jacob S. Hacker,et al.  The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and U.S. Medical Policy , 1998, Studies in American Political Development.

[47]  C. Kling,et al.  Policy Persistence in Environmental Regulation , 2003 .

[48]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4 , 2005 .

[49]  David W. Engel,et al.  Uncertainty in integrated assessment models: modeling with MiniCAM 1.0 , 1999 .

[50]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[51]  M. Sarofim,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change and Policy Response , 2003 .

[52]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[53]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Sequential climate decisions under uncertainty: An integrated framework , 1998 .

[54]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Greenhouse Debate: Econonmic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies , 1995 .