Crowding increases foraging efficiency in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica

Abstract.Many animals, including humans, organize their foraging activity along well-defined trails. Because trails are cleared of obstacles, they minimize energy expenditure and allow fast travel. In social insects such as ants, trails might also promote social contacts and allow the exchange of information between workers about the characteristics of the food. When the trail traffic is heavy, however, traffic congestion occurs and the benefits of increased social contacts for the colony can be offset by a decrease of the locomotory rate of individuals.Using a small laboratory colony of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica cutting a mix of leaves and Parafilm, we compared how foraging changed when the width of the bridge between the nest and their foraging area changed. We found that the rate of ants crossing a 5 cm wide bridge was more than twice as great as the rate crossing a 0.5 cm bridge, but the rate of foragers returning with loads was less than half as great. Thus, with the wide bridge, the ants had about six times lower efficiency (loads returned per forager crossing the bridge). We conclude that crowding actually increased foraging efficiency, possibly because of increased communication between laden foragers returning to the nest and out-going ants.

[1]  J. J. Howard,et al.  Conditioning of scouts and recruits during foraging by a leaf-cutting ant, Atta colombica , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Dr. Rainer Wirth,et al.  Herbivory of Leaf-Cutting Ants , 2003, Ecological Studies.

[3]  Flavio Roces,et al.  Olfactory conditioning during the recruitment process in a leaf-cutting ant , 1990, Oecologia.

[4]  Leif Engqvist,et al.  The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Evolution of mass transit systems in ants: a tale of two societies. , 2001 .

[6]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Trunk trails and the searching strategy of a leaf-cutter ant, Atta colombica , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[8]  D. Gordon.  The Regulation of Foraging Activity in Red Harvester Ant Colonies , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[9]  F. Roces.  Both evaluation of resource quality and speed of recruited leaf-cutting ants (Acromyrmex lundi) depend on their motivational state , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  J. Fewell.  Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[12]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Temporal organization of bi-directional traffic in the ant Lasius niger (L.) , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  S. J. Simpson,et al.  The Regulation of Feeding: Locusts and Blowflies are not so Different from Mammals , 1983, Appetite.

[14]  D. Shutler,et al.  Size-related foraging behaviour of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica , 1991 .

[15]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Leaf caching in the leafcutting ant Atta colombica: organizational shift, task partitioning and making the best of a bad job , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  D. McShea,et al.  Intermediate-level parts in insect societies: adaptive structures that ants build away from the nest , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.

[17]  M. Burd.  Server System and Queuing Models of Leaf Harvesting by Leaf-Cutting Ants , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[18]  V. Fourcassié,et al.  Information transfer during recruitment in the ant Lasius niger L. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Ants at Work - How an Insect Society Is Organized , 1999 .

[20]  C. Kost,et al.  Spatio-temporal permanence and plasticity of foraging trails in young and mature leaf-cutting ant colonies (Atta spp.) , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[21]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Host-plant selection, diet diversity, and optimal foraging in a tropical leafcutting ant , 1987, Oecologia.

[22]  M. Burd,et al.  Traffic Dynamics of the Leaf‐Cutting Ant, Atta cephalotes , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[23]  R. F. Goldman,et al.  Terrain coefficients for energy cost prediction. , 1972, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  J. Brannan.  On Modeling Resource Transport Costs: Suggested Refinements , 1992, Current Anthropology.

[25]  M. Burd,et al.  Head-on encounter rates and walking speed of foragers in leaf-cutting ant traffic , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[26]  S. Key,et al.  Effects of gaster extract trail concentration on the trail following behaviour of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr) , 1981 .

[27]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[28]  J. Lighton,et al.  Curvilinear allometry, energetics and foraging ecology: a comparison of leaf-cutting ants and army ants , 1988 .

[29]  Mechanisms affecting load size determination inAtta cephalotes L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 1994, Insectes Sociaux.

[30]  M. Burd.  Variable load size-ant size matching in leaf-cutting ants,Atta colombica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1995, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[31]  Rainer Wirth,et al.  Herbivory of Leaf-Cutting Ants: A Case Study on Atta colombica in the Tropical Rainforest of Panama , 2003 .

[32]  J. J. Howard.  Costs of trail construction and maintenance in the leaf-cutting ant Atta columbica , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Foraging by Bucket-Brigade in Leaf-Cutter Ants , 1980 .

[34]  Audrey Dussutour,et al.  Organisation spatio-temporelle des déplacements collectifs chez les fourmis , 2004 .

[35]  Zollikofer.  STEPPING PATTERNS IN ANTS - INFLUENCE OF LOAD , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  D. J. Stradling.  THE INFLUENCE OF SIZE ON FORAGING IN THE ANT, ATTA CEPHALOTES, AND THE EFFECT OF SOME PLANT DEFENCE MECHANISMS , 1978 .

[37]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Modelling the evolution of human trail systems , 1997, Nature.

[38]  I D Couzin,et al.  Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  E. Adams,et al.  Chemical interference competition by Monomorium minimum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2004, Oecologia.

[40]  H. Fowler,et al.  Foraging by Atta sexdens (Formicidae: Attini): seasonal patterns, caste and efficiency , 1979 .

[41]  W. Beeckman,et al.  Active trail pheromone compounds and trail following in the ant Atta sexdens sexdens (Hymenoptera Formicidae) , 1992 .

[42]  M. Burd.  Foraging Performance by Atta colombica, a Leaf-Cutting Ant , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[43]  P. Howse,et al.  The mass recruitment system of the leaf cutting ant, Atta cephalotes (L.) , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta) , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta) , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  C. Anderson,et al.  The adaptive benefit of leaf transfer in Atta colombica , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.