Evaluating Qualitative Research: Education of the Guard

Despite a well-established tradition within the information systems discipline and wider management investigations, researchers are frequently required to remind if not educate reviewers as to how qualitative research should be evaluated. This paper reviews and discusses criteria that have been proposed for grounded theory, ethnographic, confessional, postmodern, and interpretive and positivist case studies.

[1]  P. Prasad Systems of meaning: ethnography as a methodology for the study of information technologies , 1997 .

[2]  T. Klein,et al.  Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning , 1978 .

[3]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[4]  B. Turner,et al.  Grounded Theory and Organizational Research , 1986 .

[5]  S. Barley Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[6]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[8]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[9]  T. Kuhn,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Reflections on my Critics , 1970 .

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[12]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[13]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[14]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[15]  Alison Pickard,et al.  The applicability of constructivist user studies: how can constructivist inquiry inform service providers and systems designers? , 2004, Inf. Res..

[16]  S. Arnold,et al.  Hermeneutics and Consumer Research , 1994 .

[17]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[18]  C. Geertz The interpretation of cultures / Clifford Geertz , 1973 .

[19]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[20]  Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre,et al.  Writing: A method of inquiry. , 1994 .

[21]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  Case study research: a multi‐faceted research approach for IS , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[23]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[24]  Andrew Chan Redirecting Critique in Postmodern Organization Studies: The Perspective of Foucault , 2000 .

[25]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  K. Weick Contradictions in a Community of Scholars: The Cohesion-Accuracy Tradeoff , 2017 .

[27]  Ramiro and,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000 .

[28]  Marvin Harris,et al.  History and Significance of the EMIC/ETIC Distinction , 1976 .

[29]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[30]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[31]  Anshuman Prasad,et al.  The Contest Over Meaning: Hermeneutics as an Interpretive Methodology for Understanding Texts , 2002 .

[32]  K. Weick What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[35]  K. Gergen,et al.  Organization Science as Social Construction: Postmodern Potentials , 1996 .

[36]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[37]  C. Geertz,et al.  Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. , 1988 .

[38]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  A Confessional Account of an Ethnography About Knowledge Work , 2000, MIS Q..

[39]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[40]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[41]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[42]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[43]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[45]  C. Perry,et al.  Implementation of realism in case study research methodology , 2000 .

[46]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  Postmodernism and Organizational Research , 1997 .

[47]  Henry Mintzberg An Emerging Strategy of "Direct" Research , 1979 .

[48]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas , 1981 .

[49]  Edith Turner,et al.  The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart , 1997 .