The Team Negotiation Challenge: Defining and Managing the Internal Challenges of Negotiating Teams

Negotiation teams are widely used to negotiate on behalf of organizations, yet relatively little is known about how they overcome the challenges posed by within team dynamics to create a sound across-the-table team bargaining strategy. This paper presents a two phase analysis of accounts of negotiating team experiences collected from 45 executives. In the first phase we present a qualitative categorization of negotiating team challenges and management strategies. In the second phase we demonstrate that the match between challenges and management strategies and the quality of team process largely depends on how teams manage within team dynamics. Teams are more likely to be able to implement management strategies that match the challenges they face when teams also engage in substantive debates about negotiating team goals; teams are less likely to implement strategies that match team challenges when teams also engage in personality conflicts. Thus, substantive conflict helps rationalize team processes, while personality conflict undermines the development of appropriate team management strategies if not addressed appropriately.

[1]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Negotiating teams: A levels of analysis approach. , 2001 .

[2]  Randy Hirokawa GROUP COMMUNICATION AND PROBLEM-SOLVING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF GROUP PHASES , 1983 .

[3]  Allen C. Amason Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[4]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams , 1999 .

[5]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[6]  K. D. Benne,et al.  Functional Roles of Group Members , 2010 .

[7]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The structuration of group decisions. , 1996 .

[8]  Randy Hirokawa Group Communication and Decision-Making Performance: A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective. , 1988 .

[9]  D. Schweiger,et al.  The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision‐making , 1989 .

[10]  Deborah G. . Ancona Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[11]  R. Friedman Missing Ingredients in Mutual Gains Bargaining Theory , 1994 .

[12]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[13]  Kristin Behfar,et al.  The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study , 2003 .

[14]  R. Golembiewski Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[15]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Group Decision-Making and Disagreement , 1957 .

[16]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. , 1995 .

[17]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Positive Effects of Within‐Group Cooperation on Between‐Group Negotiation1 , 1989 .

[18]  Allen I. Kraut,et al.  Organizational surveys : tools for assessment and change , 1996 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  How management teams can have a good fight. , 2009, Harvard business review.

[20]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Multinational Work Teams: A New Perspective , 2002 .

[21]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Intergroup Negotiations , 1996 .

[22]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Concept Mapping as an Alternative Approach for the Analysis of Open-Ended Survey Responses , 2002 .

[23]  I. Janis Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[24]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  S. Brodt,et al.  Working Together but in Opposition: An Examination of the "Good-Cop/Bad-Cop" Negotiating Team Tactic. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[26]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups , 1954 .

[27]  Joanie B. Connell,et al.  Improving Decision Making by Means of Dissent1 , 2001 .

[28]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[29]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[30]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[31]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[32]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[33]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .

[34]  R. Mason Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[35]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[36]  Gregory A. Janicik,et al.  Getting and staying in-pace: the “in-synch” preference and its implications for work groups , 2002 .

[37]  Kenwyn K. Smith,et al.  Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. , 1987 .

[38]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[39]  R. Wageman Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams , 1997 .

[40]  M. Nicholson The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[41]  Charles R. Schwenk Conflict in organizational decision making: an exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations , 1990 .

[42]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[43]  R. Friedman,et al.  Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict , 1992 .

[44]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[45]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[46]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[47]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Organizational decision making: The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal , 1996 .

[49]  Roland Castellanos A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups , 2007 .

[50]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[51]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Cycles and synchrony : the temporal role of context in team behavior , 1999 .

[52]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective , 1991 .

[53]  John G. Geer,et al.  DO OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS MEASURE “SALIENT” ISSUES? , 1991 .

[54]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[55]  B. Beersma,et al.  NEGOTIATION PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES IN PROSOCIALLY AND EGOISTICALLY MOTIVATED GROUPS , 1999 .

[56]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[57]  O’Connor,et al.  Groups and Solos in Context: The Effects of Accountability on Team Negotiation. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[58]  R. Sabatelli The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[59]  G. Murphy,et al.  Concept mapping for planning and evaluation , 2007, Journal of Management & Organization.

[60]  Erika D Peterson,et al.  Team Negotiation: An Examination of Integrative and Distributive Bargaining , 1996 .

[61]  R. Walton Interpersonal peacemaking : confrontations and third-party consultation , 1969 .

[62]  P. Swingle The resolution of conflict. , 1989 .