Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum

The Augmented Representation of Cultural Objects (ARCO) system, developed as a part of an EU ICT project, provides museum curators with software and interface tools to develop web-based virtual museum exhibitions by integrating augmented reality (AR) and 3D computer graphics. ARCO technologies could also be deployed in order to implement educational kiosks placed in real-world museums. The main purpose of the system is to offer an entertaining, informative and enjoyable experience to virtual museum visitors. This paper presents a formal usability study that has been undertaken in order to explore participants' perceived 'sense of being there' and enjoyment while exposed to a virtual museum exhibition in relation to real-world visits. The virtual museum implemented was based on an existing gallery in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK. It is of interest to determine whether a high level of presence results in enhanced enjoyment. After exposure to the system, participants completed standardized presence questionnaires related to the perceived realism of cultural artifacts referred to as AR objects' presence, as well as to participants' generic perceived presence in the virtual museum referred to as VR presence. The studies conducted indicate that previous experience with ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) did not correlate with perceived AR objects' presence or VR presence while exposed to a virtual heritage environment. Enjoyment and both AR objects' presence and VR presence were found to be positively correlated. Therefore, a high level of perceived presence could be closely associated with satisfaction and gratification which contribute towards an appealing experience while interacting with a museum simulation system.

[1]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.

[2]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Virtual environments and advanced interface design , 1995 .

[3]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Using Behavioral Realism to Estimate Presence: A Study of the Utility of Postural Responses to Motion Stimuli , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Embodied Presence in Virtual Environments , 1999, Visual Representations and Interpretations.

[5]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Mel Slater,et al.  How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  L. P. Goodstein,et al.  Information Technology and Work , 1988 .

[8]  M. Schuemie.  Presence: Interacting in VR? , 1999 .

[9]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[10]  Martin White,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of the Augmented Representation of Cultural Objects System , 2004 .

[11]  Patrick Dähne,et al.  Design and implementation of a mobile device for outdoor augmented reality in the archeoguide project , 2001, VAST '01.

[12]  David W. Schloerb,et al.  A Quantitative Measure of Telepresence , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[14]  Krzysztof Walczak,et al.  AMS-Metadata for Cultural Exhibitions using Virtual Reality , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[15]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Virtual environments , 2002 .

[16]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence and performance within virtual environments , 1995 .

[18]  Krzysztof Walczak,et al.  Building Virtual and Augmented Reality museum exhibitions , 2004, Web3D '04.

[19]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[20]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Fidelity Metrics for Virtual Environment Simulations Based on Spatial Memory Awareness States , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[23]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Martin White,et al.  Usability Evaluation of a Virtual Museum Interface , 2006, Informatica.

[25]  Katerina Mania,et al.  The effect of visual and interaction fidelity on spatial cognition in immersive virtual environments , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Eilean Hooper-Greenhill.  Changing Values in the Art Museum: rethinking communication and learning , 2000 .

[27]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Measuring Presence in Augmented Reality Environments: Design and a First Test of a Questionnaire , 2021, ArXiv.

[28]  Marc M. Sebrechts,et al.  HANDBOOK OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2014 .

[29]  Greg Jones,et al.  The Future of Virtual Museums: On-Line, Immersive, 3D Environments. , 2002 .

[30]  Krzysztof Walczak,et al.  Virtual museum exbibitions , 2006, Computer.

[31]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[32]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface , 2001, Comput. Graph..

[33]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[34]  Katerina Mania,et al.  An experimental exploration of the relationship between subjective impressions of illumination and physical fidelity , 2005, Comput. Graph..

[35]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[36]  Ray Paton,et al.  Visual Representations and Interpretations , 1999, Springer London.

[37]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Aftereffects and Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments: Formulation of a Research and Development Agenda , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  Agali Mert,et al.  Letter to the editor : Presence in virtual environment , 2009 .

[39]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[40]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  3D MURALE: a multimedia system for archaeology , 2001, VAST '01.

[41]  Martin White,et al.  The evaluation of ARCO: a lesson in curatorial competence and intuition with new technology , 2008, CIE.

[42]  G. Hein.  Learning in the museum , 1998 .

[43]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Effects of Sensory Information and Prior Experience on Direct Subjective Ratings of Presence , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[44]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  A Conceptual Model of the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[45]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Human Factors Issues in Virtual Environments: A Review of the Literature , 1998, Presence.

[46]  Susan M. Pearce,et al.  Museums, Objects, and Collections: A Cultural Study , 1992 .

[47]  A. Karoulis,et al.  Combinatory Usability Evaluation of an Educational Virtual Museum Interface , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[48]  David Callear,et al.  Putting the Virtual into Reality: Assessing Object-Presence with Projection-Augmented Models , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[49]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.