Mapping students' conceptual modes when thinking about chemical reactions used to make a desired product

The central goal of this qualitative research study was to uncover major implicit assumptions that students with different levels of training in the discipline apply when thinking and making decisions about chemical reactions used to make a desired product. In particular, we elicited different ways of conceptualizing why chemical reactions happen (chemical causality), how these processes occur (chemical mechanism), and how they can be controlled (chemical control). In each of these areas we characterized conceptual modes with different explanatory power and explored how they were applied by participants when facing different types of questions. Our findings suggest potential paths in the development of understanding about chemical reactions in the context of making specific substances. Our study also highlights the benefits of analyzing students' understanding not only by focusing on implicit cognitive elements, but by using disciplinary crosscutting concepts as lenses of analysis.

[1]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  How Students Mis/Understand Science and Mathematics: Intuitive Rules (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 2000 .

[2]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.

[3]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[4]  M. Chi,et al.  Assessing Students' Misclassifications of Physics Concepts: An Ontological Basis for Conceptual Change , 1995 .

[5]  S. Pinker.  The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature , 2007 .

[6]  F. Keil.  Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 2014 .

[7]  V. Talanquer.  When Atoms Want. , 2013 .

[8]  F. Keil.  Constraints on Constraints: Surveying the Epigenetic Landscape , 1990, Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Ayush Gupta,et al.  The Case for Dynamic Models of Learners' Ontologies in Physics , 2010 .

[10]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  What is this Substance? What Makes it Different? Mapping Progression in Students’ Assumptions about Chemical Identity , 2014 .

[11]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Exploring Dominant Types of Explanations Built by General Chemistry Students , 2010 .

[12]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  How Do Students Reason About Chemical Substances and Reactions , 2013 .

[13]  Eduardo Fleury Mortimer.  Perfil Conceptual: formas de pensar y hablar en las clases de ciencias , 2001 .

[14]  Phil Scott,et al.  Conceptual Profiles: Theoretical-Methodological Bases of a Research Program , 2014 .

[15]  B. Andersson,et al.  The experiential gestalt of causation: a common core to pupils’ preconceptions in science , 1986 .

[16]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  International handbook of research on conceptual change , 2013 .

[17]  Marilyne Stains,et al.  Uncovering Implicit Assumptions: a Large-Scale Study on Students’ Mental Models of Diffusion , 2015 .

[18]  John J. Clement,et al.  Model based learning and instruction in science , 2008 .

[19]  Charles E. Caton,et al.  Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 1982 .

[20]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1989 .

[21]  K. Taber,et al.  LEARNERS’ EXPLANATIONS FOR CHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 2000 .

[22]  Marcy H. Towns,et al.  Students' understanding of alkyl halide reactions in undergraduate organic chemistry , 2014 .

[23]  David Hammer,et al.  Conceptual change in physics , 2013 .

[24]  Melanie M. Cooper,et al.  Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? , 2012 .

[25]  Melanie M. Cooper,et al.  Decorating with Arrows: Toward the Development of Representational Competence in Organic Chemistry , 2012 .

[26]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[27]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis , 1989 .

[28]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  S. Gelman.  Learning from others: children's construction of concepts. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Gautam Bhattacharyya.  Trials and tribulations: student approaches and difficulties with proposing mechanisms using the electron-pushing formalism , 2014 .

[31]  R. Duschl,et al.  Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis , 2011 .

[32]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Threshold Concepts in Chemistry: The Critical Role of Implicit Schemas , 2015 .

[33]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[34]  Developing Chemical Understanding in the Explanatory Vacuum: Swedish High School Students’ Use of an Anthropomorphic Conceptual Framework to Make Sense of Chemical Phenomena , 2013 .

[35]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in organic chemistry , 2008 .

[36]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Students' predictions about the sensory properties of chemical compounds: Additive versus emergent frameworks , 2008 .

[37]  Gautam Bhattacharyya,et al.  "It Gets Me to the Product": How Students Propose Organic Mechanisms , 2005 .

[38]  B. Andersson.  Pupils' Conceptions of Matter and its Transformations (age 12-16) , 1990 .

[39]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Rethinking chemistry: a learning progression on chemical thinking , 2014 .

[40]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Students' Misunderstandings and Misconceptions in College Freshman Chemistry (General and Organic). , 1990 .

[41]  J. Krajcik.  The Importance, Cautions and Future of Learning Progression Research , 2012 .

[42]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Making predictions about chemical reactivity: Assumptions and heuristics , 2013 .

[43]  S. Vosniadou.  Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[44]  S. Vosniadou.  The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change , 2009 .

[45]  Adam Kraft,et al.  Reasonable reasoning: multi-variate problem-solving in organic chemistry , 2010 .

[46]  Melanie M. Cooper,et al.  An investigation of college chemistry students' understanding of structure–property relationships , 2013 .

[47]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[48]  Burtron H. Davis,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, catalysts and catalysis , 2007 .

[49]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[50]  Stella Vosniadou.  Conceptual Change in Learning and Instruction , 2013 .

[51]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Let’s teach how we think instead of what we know , 2010 .

[52]  E. Mortimer,et al.  Conceptual change or Conceptual Profile change? , 1995 .

[53]  Maija Ahtee,et al.  Students’ understanding of chemical reaction , 1998 .

[54]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  A Common Core to Chemical Conceptions: Learners’ Conceptions of Chemical Stability, Change and Bonding , 2013 .

[55]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Commonsense Chemistry: A Model for Understanding Students' Alternative Conceptions , 2006 .

[56]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  FOCUS ARTICLE: Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory , 2006 .

[57]  Mustafa Toprak,et al.  The role of conceptual change texts to improve students' understanding of alkenes , 2013 .

[58]  Vassilia Hatzinikita,et al.  Modeling Pupils' Understanding and Explanations Concerning Changes in Matter , 2005 .

[59]  Tina A. Grotzer.  Learning to Understand the Forms of Causality Implicit in Scientifically Accepted Explanations , 2003 .

[60]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[61]  G. Hatano,et al.  Domain-specific constraints of conceptual development , 2000 .

[62]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: Name index , 1989 .

[63]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  The significance of implicit knowledge for learning and teaching chemistry , 2014 .

[64]  P M Todd,et al.  Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.