Deep generative models for galaxy image simulations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Huertas-Company,et al. A deep learning approach to test the small-scale galaxy morphology and its relationship with star formation activity in hydrodynamical simulations , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[2] Andrew P. Hearin,et al. The LSST DESC DC2 Simulated Sky Survey , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[3] E. Aubourg,et al. Deblending galaxies with variational autoencoders: A joint multiband, multi-instrument approach , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[4] Michael L. Waskom,et al. mwaskom/seaborn: v0.10.1 (April 2020) , 2020 .
[5] T Glanzman,et al. The LSST DESC data challenge 1: generation and analysis of synthetic images for next-generation surveys , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[6] P. Capak,et al. A synthetic Roman Space Telescope High-Latitude Imaging Survey: simulation suite and the impact of wavefront errors on weak gravitational lensing , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[7] Nan Li,et al. CosmoDC2: A Synthetic Sky Catalog for Dark Energy Science with LSST , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[8] J. Weller,et al. Monte Carlo control loops for cosmic shear cosmology with DES Year 1 data , 2019, Physical Review D.
[9] Michael J. Smith,et al. Generative deep fields: arbitrarily sized, random synthetic astronomical images through deep learning , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[10] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release , 2018, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology.
[11] H. Hoekstra,et al. Towards emulating cosmic shear data: revisiting the calibration of the shear measurements for the Kilo-Degree Survey , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[12] Levi Fussell,et al. Forging new worlds: high-resolution synthetic galaxies with chained generative adversarial networks , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[13] David M. Reiman,et al. Deblending galaxy superpositions with branched generative adversarial networks , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[14] D. Hogg,et al. Hierarchical Modeling and Statistical Calibration for Photometric Redshifts , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[15] J. Rhodes,et al. Image simulations for gravitational lensing withskylens , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[16] Fred Moolekamp,et al. scarlet: Source separation in multi-band images by Constrained Matrix Factorization , 2018, Astron. Comput..
[17] Miguel de Val-Borro,et al. The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.
[18] A. Leauthaud,et al. Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[19] D. Gerdes,et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the impact of galaxy neighbours on weak lensing cosmology with IM3SHAPE , 2017, 1708.01534.
[20] Song Huang,et al. The Hyper Suprime-Cam Software Pipeline , 2017, 1705.06766.
[21] Erin S. Sheldon,et al. Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration , 2017, 1702.02601.
[22] Ce Zhang,et al. Generative Adversarial Networks recover features in astrophysical images of galaxies beyond the deconvolution limit , 2017, ArXiv.
[23] Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al. StackGAN: Text to Photo-Realistic Image Synthesis with Stacked Generative Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
[24] M. Maturi. De-noising the galaxies in the Hubble XDF with EMPCA , 2016, 1607.05724.
[25] H. Hoekstra,et al. Calibration of weak-lensing shear in the Kilo-Degree Survey , 2016, 1606.05337.
[26] Thomas Brox,et al. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.
[27] R. Somerville,et al. Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework , 2014, 1412.2712.
[28] Michael D. Schneider,et al. GREAT3 results - I. Systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology , 2014, 1412.1825.
[29] R. Mandelbaum,et al. The impact of cosmic variance on simulating weak lensing surveys , 2014, 1412.1094.
[30] V. Vikram,et al. A catalogue of 2D photometric decompositions in the SDSS-DR7 spectroscopic main galaxy sample: preferred models and systematics , 2014, 1406.4179.
[31] Robert Armstrong,et al. GalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit , 2014, Astron. Comput..
[32] Jun Zhang,et al. Accurate shear measurement with faint sources , 2013, 1312.5514.
[33] T. Kitching,et al. On the Probability Distributions of Ellipticity , 2013, 1309.7844.
[34] Aaron Roodman,et al. THE THIRD GRAVITATIONAL LENSING ACCURACY TESTING (GREAT3) CHALLENGE HANDBOOK , 2013, 1308.4982.
[35] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304,122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2013, 1308.3496.
[36] Prasanth H. Nair,et al. Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , 2013, 1307.6212.
[37] C. J. Conselice,et al. New image statistics for detecting disturbed galaxy morphologies at high redshift , 2013, 1306.1238.
[38] Michael C. Cooper,et al. THE ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEYS GENERAL CATALOG: STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS FOR APPROXIMATELY HALF A MILLION GALAXIES , 2012, 1203.1651.
[39] R. Nichol,et al. Euclid Definition Study Report , 2011, 1110.3193.
[40] E. Komatsu,et al. Cosmic shears should not be measured in conventional ways , 2010, 1002.3615.
[41] Gary M. Bernstein,et al. Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients , 2010, 1001.2333.
[42] K. Abazajian,et al. THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2008, 0812.0649.
[43] John D. Hunter,et al. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[44] Brian E. Granger,et al. IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[45] D. Calzetti,et al. The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing , 2007, astro-ph/0703095.
[46] Cea,et al. Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements , 2007, astro-ph/0702359.
[47] R. Massey,et al. Weak gravitational shear and flexion with polar shapelets , 2006, astro-ph/0609795.
[48] P. Madau,et al. A New Nonparametric Approach to Galaxy Morphological Classification , 2003, astro-ph/0311352.
[49] C. Conselice. The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories , 2003, astro-ph/0303065.
[50] R. Massey,et al. Image simulation with shapelets , 2003, astro-ph/0301449.
[51] Uros Seljak,et al. Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys , 2003, astro-ph/0301054.
[52] G. Bernstein,et al. Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing , 2001, astro-ph/0107431.
[53] P. Murdin. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY , 2005 .
[54] Shumeet Baluja,et al. Advances in Neural Information Processing , 1994 .