Different patterns of peripheral migration by memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

Infections localized to peripheral tissues such as the skin result in the priming of T-cell responses that act to control pathogens. Activated T cells undergo migrational imprinting within the draining lymph nodes, resulting in memory T cells that provide local and systemic protection. Combinations of migrating and resident memory T cells have been implicated in long-term peripheral immunity, especially at the surfaces that form pathogen entry points into the body. However, T-cell immunity consists of separate CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ killer T cells, with distinct effector and memory programming requirements. Whether these subsets also differ in their ability to form a migrating pool involved in peripheral immunosurveillance or a separate resident population responsible for local infection control has not been explored. Here, using mice, we show key differences in the migration and tissue localization of memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells following infection of the skin by herpes simplex virus. On resolution of infection, the skin contained two distinct virus-specific memory subsets; a slow-moving population of sequestered CD8+ T cells that were resident in the epidermis and confined largely to the original site of infection, and a dynamic population of CD4+ T cells that trafficked rapidly through the dermis as part of a wider recirculation pattern. Unique homing-molecule expression by recirculating CD4+ T effector-memory cells mirrored their preferential skin-migratory capacity. Overall, these results identify a complexity in memory T-cell migration, illuminating previously unappreciated differences between the CD4+ and CD8+ subsets.

[1]  L. Lefrançois,et al.  Dynamics of blood-borne CD8 memory T cell migration in vivo. , 2004, Immunity.

[2]  E. Butcher,et al.  Environmental cues, dendritic cells and the programming of tissue-selective lymphocyte trafficking , 2008, Nature Immunology.

[3]  M. Bevan,et al.  Memory T cells persisting within the brain after local infection show functional adaptations to their tissue of residence , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  G. Belz,et al.  Cross-presentation of antigens by dendritic cells. , 2002, Critical reviews in immunology.

[5]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[6]  D. Rimm,et al.  Adhesion between epithelial cells and T lymphocytes mediated by E-cadherin and the alpha E beta 7 integrin. , 1994, Nature.

[7]  Scott N. Mueller,et al.  In vivo imaging of the T cell response to infection. , 2010, Current opinion in immunology.

[8]  R. Webby,et al.  Dynamic T cell migration program provides resident memory within intestinal epithelium , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  Scott N. Mueller,et al.  Characterization of two TCR transgenic mouse lines specific for herpes simplex virus , 2002, Immunology and cell biology.

[10]  Thomas Gebhardt,et al.  Memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissue that provide enhanced local immunity during infection with herpes simplex virus , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[11]  W. Pichler,et al.  Human afferent lymph from normal skin contains an increased number of mainly memory / effector CD4+ T cells expressing activation, adhesion and co‐stimulatory molecules , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[12]  A. Wald,et al.  Persistence of HIV-1 Receptor-Positive Cells after HSV-2 Reactivation: A Potential Mechanism for Increased HIV-1 Acquisition , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[13]  P. Moore,et al.  Langerhans cells, macrophages and lymphocyte subsets in the cervix and vagina of rhesus macaques. , 1992, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[14]  D. Beier,et al.  Mucosal T lymphocyte numbers are selectively reduced in integrin alpha E (CD103)-deficient mice. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[15]  A. Brooks,et al.  Herpes Simplex Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Can Clear Established Lytic Infections from Skin and Nerves and Can Partially Limit the Early Spread of Virus after Cutaneous Inoculation1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[16]  Frank O. Nestle,et al.  Skin immune sentinels in health and disease , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[17]  M. Cybulsky,et al.  Getting to the site of inflammation: the leukocyte adhesion cascade updated , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[18]  W. Heath,et al.  Rapid recruitment and activation of CD8+ T cells after herpes simplex virus type 1 skin infection , 2011, Immunology and cell biology.

[19]  C. M. Preston,et al.  CD8+ T‐cell attenuation of cutaneous herpes simplex virus infection reduces the average viral copy number of the ensuing latent infection , 2008, Immunology and cell biology.

[20]  C. Mackay,et al.  Naive and memory T cells show distinct pathways of lymphocyte recirculation , 1990, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[21]  E. Wherry,et al.  Heterogeneity and cell-fate decisions in effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation during viral infection. , 2007, Immunity.

[22]  R. Ahmed,et al.  Similarities and differences in CD4+ and CD8+ effector and memory T cell generation , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[23]  Philippe Bousso,et al.  T-cell activation by dendritic cells in the lymph node: lessons from the movies , 2008, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[24]  J. Kohlmeier,et al.  Migration, maintenance and recall of memory T cells in peripheral tissues , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[25]  L. Lefrançois,et al.  Preferential Localization of Effector Memory Cells in Nonlymphoid Tissue , 2001, Science.