Winter Arctic sea ice thickness from ICESat-2: upgrades to freeboard and snow loading estimates and an assessment of the first three winters of data collection

Abstract. Reliable basin-scale estimates of sea ice thickness are urgently needed to improve our understanding of recent changes and future projections of polar climate. Data collected by NASA’s ICESat-2 mission have provided new, high-resolution, estimates of sea ice freeboard across both hemispheres since data collection started in October 2018. These data have been used in recent work to produce estimates of winter Arctic sea ice thickness using snow loading estimates from the NASA Eulerian Snow On Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM). Here we provide an impact assessment of upgrades to both the ICESat-2 freeboard data (ATL10) and NESOSIM snow loading on estimates of winter Arctic sea ice thickness. Misclassified leads were removed from the freeboard algorithm in the third release (rel003) of ICESat-2 freeboard data, which increased freeboards in January and April 2019, and increased the fraction of low freeboards in November 2018, compared to rel002. These changes improved comparisons of sea ice thickness (lower mean biases and standard deviations, higher correlations) with monthly gridded thickness estimates produced from ESA’s CryoSat-2 (using the same input snow and ice density assumptions). Later releases (rel004 and rel005) of ICESat-2 ATL10 freeboards result in less significant changes in the freeboard distributions and thus thickness. The latest version of NESOSIM (version 1.1), forced by CloudSat-scaled ERA5 snowfall, has been re-calibrated using snow depth estimates obtained by NASA’s Operation IceBridge airborne mission. The upgrade from NESOSIM v1.0 to v1.1 results in only small changes in snow depth which have a less significant impact on thickness compared to the rel002 to rel003 freeboard changes. Finally, we present our updated monthly gridded winter Arctic sea ice thickness dataset and highlight key changes over the past three winter seasons of data collection (November 2018–April 2021). Strong differences in total winter Arctic thickness across the three winters are observed, linked to clear differences in the multiyear ice thickness at the start of each winter. Interannual changes in snow depth provide significant impacts on our thickness results on regional and seasonal scales. Our analysis of recent winter Arctic sea ice thickness variability is provided online in a novel Jupyter Book format to increase transparency and user engagement with our derived gridded monthly thickness dataset.

[1]  J. Bouffard,et al.  Improved Arctic Sea Ice Freeboard Retrieval from Satellite Altimetry Using Optimized Sea Surface Decorrelation Scales , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[2]  J. Stroeve,et al.  Faster decline and higher variability in the sea ice thickness of the marginal Arctic seas when accounting for dynamic snow cover , 2020, The Cryosphere.

[3]  Kelly M. Brunt,et al.  Early ICESat-2 on-orbit Geolocation Validation Using Ground-Based Corner Cube Retro-Reflectors , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[4]  J. Stroeve,et al.  A Lagrangian Snow‐Evolution System for Sea‐Ice Applications (SnowModel‐LG): Part I—Model Description , 2020, Journal of geophysical research. Oceans.

[5]  R. Kwok,et al.  Refining the sea surface identification approach for determining freeboards in the ICESat-2 sea ice products , 2020, The Cryosphere.

[6]  P. Kushner,et al.  Constraining Reanalysis Snowfall Over the Arctic Ocean Using CloudSat Observations , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[7]  J. Stroeve,et al.  Arctic Ocean Precipitation From Atmospheric Reanalyses and Comparisons With North Pole Drifting Station Records , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[8]  T. Haiden,et al.  Impact of a Multi‐Layer Snow Scheme on Near‐Surface Weather Forecasts , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[9]  Thorsten Markus,et al.  The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite - 2 Mission: A Global Geolocated Photon Product Derived From the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System. , 2019, Remote sensing of environment.

[10]  N. T. Kurtz,et al.  ICESat‐2 Surface Height and Sea Ice Freeboard Assessed With ATM Lidar Acquisitions From Operation IceBridge , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[11]  Robert M. Graham,et al.  Comparison of ERA5 and ERA-Interim near-surface air temperature, snowfall and precipitation over Arctic sea ice: effects on sea ice thermodynamics and evolution , 2019, The Cryosphere.

[12]  M. Holland,et al.  Warm Arctic, Increased Winter Sea Ice Growth? , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[13]  T. Markus,et al.  The NASA Eulerian Snow on Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM) v1.0: initial model development and analysis , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[14]  D. Notz,et al.  Retrievals of Arctic Sea‐Ice Volume and Its Trend Significantly Affected by Interannual Snow Variability , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[15]  R. Kwok Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: losses and coupled variability (1958–2018) , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[16]  S. Farrell,et al.  Assessment of contemporary satellite sea ice thickness products for Arctic sea ice , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[17]  Anja Rösel,et al.  Comparison of Freeboard Retrieval and Ice Thickness Calculation From ALS, ASIRAS, and CryoSat-2 in the Norwegian Arctic to Field Measurements Made During the N-ICE2015 Expedition , 2018 .

[18]  Andrew Shepherd,et al.  Estimating Arctic sea ice thickness and volume using CryoSat-2 radar altimeter data , 2017, Advances in Space Research.

[19]  R. Kwok,et al.  Intercomparison of snow depth retrievals over Arctic sea ice from radar data acquired by Operation IceBridge , 2017 .

[20]  Stephen E. L. Howell,et al.  Effect of Snow Salinity on CryoSat‐2 Arctic First‐Year Sea Ice Freeboard Measurements , 2017 .

[21]  Melanie J. Leng,et al.  Snow contribution to first‐year and second‐year Arctic sea ice mass balance north of Svalbard , 2017 .

[22]  David J. Harding,et al.  The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation , 2017 .

[23]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Testing the ice-water discrimination and freeboard retrieval algorithms for the ICESat-2 mission☆ , 2016 .

[24]  S. Hendricks,et al.  User Guide - AWI CryoSat-2 Sea Ice Thickness Data Product (v1.2) , 2016 .

[25]  J. Richter-Menge,et al.  Sea ice circulation around the Beaufort Gyre: The changing role of wind forcing and the sea ice state , 2016 .

[26]  Richard R. Forster,et al.  Annual Greenland accumulation rates (2009–2012) from airborne snow radar , 2015 .

[27]  Peter Toose,et al.  Evaluation of Operation IceBridge quick‐look snow depth estimates on sea ice , 2015 .

[28]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Sea ice convergence along the Arctic coasts of Greenland and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: Variability and extremes (1992–2014) , 2015 .

[29]  Duncan J. Wingham,et al.  Increased Arctic sea ice volume after anomalously low melting in 2013 , 2015 .

[30]  R. Kwok,et al.  Variability of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume from CryoSat-2 , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[31]  Michael Studinger,et al.  An Improved CryoSat-2 Sea Ice Freeboard Retrieval Algorithm Through the Use of Waveform Fitting , 2014 .

[32]  Natalia Galin,et al.  Sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products from Operation IceBridge airborne data , 2013 .

[33]  Malcolm Davidson,et al.  CryoSat‐2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume , 2013 .

[34]  Charmien Johnson Msfc Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite , 2013 .

[35]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Use of C-Band Scatterometer for Sea Ice Edge Identification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Uncertainty in modeled Arctic sea ice volume , 2011 .

[37]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[38]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Sea ice motion from low-resolution satellite sensors: An alternative method and its validation in the Arctic , 2010 .

[39]  Ron Kwok,et al.  ICESat over Arctic sea ice: Estimation of snow depth and ice thickness , 2008 .

[40]  Duncan J. Wingham,et al.  Combined airborne laser and radar altimeter measurements over the Fram Strait in May 2002 , 2007 .

[41]  Vladimir F. Radionov,et al.  Snow Depth on Arctic Sea Ice , 1999 .

[42]  Liu Xinwu This is How the Discussion Started , 1981 .