Crust and Upper Mantle Structure Beneath the Eastern United States

The Eastern United States (EUS) has a complex geological history and hosts several seismic active regions. We investigate the subsurface structure beneath the broader EUS. To produce reliable images of the subsurface, we simultaneously invert smoothed P‐wave receiver functions, Rayleigh‐wave phase and group velocity measurements, and Bouguer gravity observations for the 3D shear‐wave speed. Using surface‐wave observations (3–250 s) and spatially smoothed receiver functions, our velocity models are robust, reliable, and rich in detail. The shear‐wave velocity models fit all three types of observations well. The resulting velocity model for the eastern U.S. shows thinner crust beneath New England, the east coast, and the Mississippi Embayment (ME). A relatively thicker crust was found beneath the stable North America craton. A relatively slower upper mantle was imaged beneath New England, the east coast, and western ME. A comparison of crust thickness derived from our model against four recent published models shows first‐order consistency. A relatively small upper mantle low‐speed region correlates with a published P‐wave analysis that has associated the anomaly with a 75 Ma kimberlite volcanic site in Kentucky. We also explored the relationship between the subsurface structure and seismicity in the eastern U.S. We found that earthquakes often locate near regions with seismic velocity variations, but not universally. Not all regions of significant subsurface wave speed changes are loci of seismicity. A weak correlation between upper mantle shear velocity and earthquake focal mechanism has been observed.

[1]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Short-Period Surface-Wave Tomography in the Continental United States—A Resource for Research , 2021 .

[2]  B. Savage Body Wave Speed Structure of Eastern North America , 2020, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.

[3]  Haijiang Zhang,et al.  A 3D Full Stress Tensor Model for Oklahoma , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[4]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  The Generic Mapping Tools Version 6 , 2019, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.

[5]  M. Wysession,et al.  P Wave Teleseismic Traveltime Tomography of the North American Midcontinent , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[6]  W. Menke,et al.  Crustal Heating and Lithospheric Alteration and Erosion Associated With Asthenospheric Upwelling Beneath Southern New England (USA) , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[7]  K. Fischer,et al.  The relative roles of inheritance and long-term passive margin lithospheric evolution on the modern structure and tectonic activity in the southeastern United States , 2018 .

[8]  F. Vernon,et al.  Shear Wave Tomography Beneath the United States Using a Joint Inversion of Surface and Body Waves , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[9]  Monica Maceira,et al.  Interactive Visualization of Complex Seismic Data and Models Using Bokeh , 2018 .

[10]  W. Menke,et al.  Seismic High Attenuation Region Observed Beneath Southern New England From Teleseismic Body Wave Spectra: Evidence for High Asthenospheric Temperature Without Melt , 2017 .

[11]  Sridhar Anandakrishnan,et al.  Estimating subglacial structure using P-wave receiver functions , 2017 .

[12]  Yang Shen,et al.  Wave speed structure of the eastern North American margin , 2017 .

[13]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  A Quality Control Method for Teleseismic P‐Wave Receiver Functions , 2016 .

[14]  O. Boyd,et al.  Dense lower crust elevates long‐term earthquake rates in the New Madrid seismic zone , 2016 .

[15]  Younghee Kim,et al.  A seismic reference model for the crust and uppermost mantle beneath China from surface wave dispersion , 2016 .

[16]  M. Ritzwoller,et al.  Crustal and uppermost mantle structure beneath the United States , 2016 .

[17]  C. Langston,et al.  A joint local and teleseismic tomography study of the Mississippi Embayment and New Madrid Seismic Zone , 2016 .

[18]  K. Fischer,et al.  Relationship between observed upper mantle structures and recent tectonic activity across the Southeastern United States , 2016 .

[19]  S. Marshak,et al.  Shear velocity structure beneath the central United States: implications for the origin of the Illinois Basin and intraplate seismicity , 2016 .

[20]  W. Holt,et al.  Lithospheric records of orogeny within the continental U.S. , 2016 .

[21]  K. Karlstrom,et al.  Distinct crustal isostasy trends east and west of the Rocky Mountain Front , 2015 .

[22]  S. Ni,et al.  Joint inversion of body wave receiver function and Rayleigh wave ellipticity , 2015 .

[23]  T. Kusky,et al.  Stress development in heterogenetic lithosphere: Insights into earthquake processes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 2015 .

[24]  A. Levander,et al.  PdS receiver function evidence for crustal scale thrusting, relic subduction, and mafic underplating in the Trans-Hudson Orogen and Yavapai province , 2015 .

[25]  Monica Maceira,et al.  Inverting interpolated receiver functions with surface wave dispersion and gravity: Application to the western U.S. and adjacent Canada and Mexico , 2015 .

[26]  J. Gaherty,et al.  Surface wave phase-velocity tomography based on multichannel cross-correlation , 2015 .

[27]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy: a bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem , 2015 .

[28]  R. Blakely,et al.  Basement domain map of the conterminous United States and Alaska , 2015 .

[29]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Seismic structure of the Central US crust and shallow upper mantle: Uniqueness of the Reelfoot Rift , 2014 .

[30]  G. Ekström Love and Rayleigh phase-velocity maps, 5–40 s, of the western and central USA from USArray data , 2014 .

[31]  Sarah E. Mazza,et al.  Volcanoes of the passive margin: The youngest magmatic event in eastern North America , 2014 .

[32]  Shiguo Wu,et al.  Crust and upper mantle structure of the New Madrid Seismic Zone: Insight into intraplate earthquakes , 2014 .

[33]  Xiaodong Song,et al.  Crustal structure beneath SE Tibet from joint analysis of receiver functions and Rayleigh wave dispersion , 2014 .

[34]  G. Vlahović,et al.  Crustal velocity structure associated with the eastern Tennessee seismic zone: Vp and Vs images based upon local earthquake tomography , 2014 .

[35]  Stephen S. Gao,et al.  Seismic anisotropy and mantle flow beneath the northern Great Plains of North America , 2013 .

[36]  Remko Scharroo,et al.  Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released , 2013 .

[37]  N. Simmons,et al.  Dynamic Topography Change of the Eastern United States Since 3 Million Years Ago , 2013, Science.

[38]  G. Masters,et al.  Update on CRUST1.0 - A 1-degree Global Model of Earth's Crust , 2013 .

[39]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Hidden hotspot track beneath the eastern United States , 2012 .

[40]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) , 2012 .

[41]  James L. Coleman,et al.  Preliminary catalog of the sedimentary basins of the United States , 2012 .

[42]  Georges Balmino,et al.  Spherical harmonic modelling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[43]  G. Ekström A global model of Love and Rayleigh surface wave dispersion and anisotropy, 25–250 s , 2011 .

[44]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Monitoring the Earthquake source process in North America , 2011 .

[45]  Zachary Frone,et al.  Temperature-At-Depth Maps for the Conterminous U. S. and Geothermal Resource Estimates , 2011 .

[46]  C. Langston Wave-Field Continuation and Decomposition for Passive Seismic Imaging Under Deep Unconsolidated Sediments , 2011 .

[47]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy – What can it do for data centers and observatories? , 2011 .

[48]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[49]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[50]  Peter J. Berquist,et al.  Whole-rock Pb and Sm-Nd isotopic constraints on the growth of southeastern Laurentia during Grenvillian orogenesis , 2010 .

[51]  R. Hatcher The Appalachian orogen: A brief summary , 2010 .

[52]  T. Rivers,et al.  Protracted continental collision — evidence from the Grenville OrogenThis article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme Lithoprobe — parameters, processes, and the evolution of a continent. , 2010 .

[53]  D. Daniels,et al.  New York–Alabama lineament: A buried right-slip fault bordering the Appalachians and mid-continent North America , 2010 .

[54]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology , 2010 .

[55]  Monica Maceira,et al.  Joint inversion of surface wave velocity and gravity observations and its application to central Asian basins shear velocity structure , 2009 .

[56]  Steven J. Whitmeyer,et al.  Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America , 2007 .

[57]  Yingjie Yang,et al.  Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements , 2007 .

[58]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[59]  D. Eaton,et al.  Seismic evidence for convection-driven motion of the North American plate , 2007, Nature.

[60]  S. Stein Approaches to continental intraplate earthquake issues , 2007 .

[61]  Mian Liu,et al.  Stress evolution and seismicity in the central-eastern United States: Insights from geodynamic modeling , 2007 .

[62]  Thomas J. Owens,et al.  Automated Receiver Function Processing , 2005 .

[63]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Lithospheric structure of the Arabian Shield from the joint inversion of receiver functions and surface-wave group velocities , 2003 .

[64]  R. V. Arsdale,et al.  The Mississippi Embayment, North America: a first order continental structure generated by the Cretaceous superplume mantle event , 2002 .

[65]  Robert H. Lafferty,et al.  The Earthquake Potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 2002 .

[66]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Sinking Mafic Body in a Reactivated Lower Crust: A Mechanism for Stress Concentration at the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 2001 .

[67]  M. Zoback,et al.  Did deglaciation trigger intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid seismic zone , 2001 .

[68]  S. Hough,et al.  On the Modified Mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes , 2000 .

[69]  Charles J. Ammon,et al.  Lithospheric Structure of the Arabian Shield from the Joint Inversion of Receiver Function and Surface-Wave Dispersion Observations , 2000 .

[70]  Kenner,et al.  A mechanical model for intraplate earthquakes: application to the new madrid seismic zone , 2000, Science.

[71]  P. Renne,et al.  New evidence for geologically instantaneous emplacement of earliest Jurassic Central Atlantic magmatic province basalts on the North American margin , 2000 .

[72]  Lupei Zhu,et al.  Crustal structure across the San Andreas Fault, southern California from teleseismic converted waves , 2000 .

[73]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions , 2000 .

[74]  R. Catchings Regional Vp, Vs, Vp/Vs, and Poisson's ratios across earthquake source zones from Memphis, Tennessee, to St. Louis, Missouri , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[75]  Charles J. Ammon,et al.  Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation , 1999 .

[76]  Newman,et al.  Slow deformation and lower seismic hazard at the new madrid seismic zone , 1999, Science.

[77]  Rodger T. Faill A geologic history of the north-central Appalachians, part 3. The Alleghany orogeny , 1998 .

[78]  J. Brune,et al.  Shear-wave velocity structure in the northern Basin and Range province from the combined analysis of receiver functions and surface waves , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[79]  Thomas G. Hildenbrand,et al.  Quantitative investigations of the Missouri gravity low: A possible expression of a large, Late Precambrian batholith intersecting the New Madrid seismic zone , 1996 .

[80]  A. Johnston Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—III. New Madrid 1811–1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755 , 1996 .

[81]  R. M. Richardson,et al.  Tectonic stress within the New Madrid seismic zone , 1996 .

[82]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[83]  Walter D. Mooney,et al.  Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A global view , 1995 .

[84]  Charles J. Ammon,et al.  The isolation of receiver effects from teleseismic P waveforms , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[85]  G. Randall,et al.  On the nonuniqueness of receiver function inversions , 1990 .

[86]  Saito Masanori,et al.  DISPER80; a subroutine package for calculation of seismic normal-mode solutions , 1988 .

[87]  N. Opdyke,et al.  Florida as an exotic terrane: Paleomagnetic and geochronologic investigation of lower Paleozoic rocks from the subsurface of Florida , 1987 .

[88]  W. Griffin,et al.  Is the continental Moho the crust-mantle boundary? , 1987 .

[89]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[90]  K. Furlong,et al.  Continental crustal underplating: Thermal considerations and seismic‐petrologic consequences , 1986 .

[91]  W. Mooney,et al.  Crustal Structure of the Northern Mississippi Embayment and a Comparison with other Continental Rift Zones , 1983 .

[92]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  LSQR: An Algorithm for Sparse Linear Equations and Sparse Least Squares , 1982, TOMS.

[93]  Charles A. Langston,et al.  Structure under Mount Rainier, Washington, inferred from teleseismic body waves , 1979 .

[94]  Donald Plouff,et al.  GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC FIELDS OF POLYGONAL PRISMS AND APPLICATION TO MAGNETIC TERRAIN CORRECTIONS , 1976 .

[95]  N. Biswas Earth-flattening procedure for the propagation of Rayleigh wave , 1972 .