The number of vegetation types in European countries: major determinants and extrapolation to other regions

Questions: How many vegetation classes and alliances are described in European countries? What are the main factors driving the number of these vegetation types? What would be the estimated number of vegetation types in so far under-explored regions outside Europe? Location: Twenty-three countries and regions in Europe. Fourteen regions outside Europe. Methods: We compiled lists of vegetation types (phytosociological classes as broader units and alliances as narrower ones) described in European countries with a well-developed vegetation classification. The delimitation and nomenclature of classes and alliances were standardized according to a unified classification system for Europe. Generalized linear models were used to test the influence of floristic richness, area, sampling effort, altitudinal range and geological diversity on the number of vegetation types. Best predictors were used to estimate the number of classes and alliances in selected regions over the world. Results: In agreement with broadly recognized diversity patterns, we found the highest numbers of vegetation types in countries with a mediterranean climate. The numbers of classes and alliances per country did not depend on the country size, while country's floristic richness was identified as the main explanatory variable, accounting for up to 67% of explained deviance. The number of alliances increased in countries with broad altitudinal range and large geological diversity, but these variables did not influence the number of classes. Accordingly, estimates of the number of alliances for other (mostly non-European) regions were adjusted when including altitudinal range as an additional predictor. Conclusions: At broad scales, the number of vegetation types can be predicted from floristic richness, which indirectly accounts for the effect of area, and from environmental heterogeneity. Furthermore, this overview demonstrates that the number of phytosociological alliances reflects biogeographic patterns in Europe better than the number of classes. We also estimate, for the first time, the number of vegetation types that may be expected in so far poorly surveyed regions worldwide, using procedures of vegetation classification analogous to those used in European phytosociology.

[1]  R. Ejrnæs,et al.  Biogeographic patterns of base-rich fen vegetation across Europe , 2014 .

[2]  Chyi-Rong Chiou,et al.  Classification of Taiwan forest vegetation , 2013 .

[3]  E. Box,et al.  Vegetation Types and Their Broad‐scale Distribution , 2013 .

[4]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  Classification of Natural and Semi‐natural Vegetation , 2013 .

[5]  T. Monteiro‐Henriques,et al.  Vascular plant communities in Portugal (Continental, the Azores and Madeira) , 2012 .

[6]  E. Ballesteros,et al.  Distribution and richness of aquatic plants across Europe and Mediterranean countries: patterns, environmental driving factors and comparison with total plant richness , 2012 .

[7]  T. Hickler,et al.  Species Richness-Environment Relationships of European Arthropods at Two Spatial Grains: Habitats and Countries , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  S. Wiser,et al.  Status Assessment of New Zealand's Naturally Uncommon Ecosystems , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  L. Montanarella,et al.  European Soil Data Centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements , 2012 .

[10]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Vegetation of the Czech Republic: diversity, ecology, history and dynamics , 2012 .

[11]  A. Čarni,et al.  Conspectus of Vegetation Syntaxa in Slovenia , 2012 .

[12]  Z. Kaplan,et al.  Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic , 2012 .

[13]  K. Steinmann,et al.  Niches and noise—Disentangling habitat diversity and area effect on species diversity , 2011 .

[14]  Susan K. Wiser,et al.  New Zealand's forest and shrubland communities: a quantitative classification based on a nationally representative plot network. , 2011 .

[15]  J. Izco,et al.  Syntaxonomical diversity: Relationships between syntaxa richness and area , 2011 .

[16]  J. Oldeland,et al.  The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science , 2011 .

[17]  Erika A. Sudderth,et al.  Soil drying and nitrogen availability modulate carbon and water exchange over a range of annual precipitation totals and grassland vegetation types , 2009 .

[18]  Don Faber-Langendoen,et al.  Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification , 2009 .

[19]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Assessing the Threat Status of Ecological Communities , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  R. Tzonev,et al.  Syntaxa according tо the Braun-Blanquet approach in Bulgaria , 2009 .

[21]  J. Šibík,et al.  Diagnostic, constant and dominant species of the higher vegetation units of Slovakia , 2008 .

[22]  Athanasios S. Kallimanis,et al.  How does habitat diversity affect the species-area relationship , 2008 .

[23]  J. S. Rodwell,et al.  Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview , 2008 .

[24]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Habitat and climate heterogeneity maintain beta‐diversity of birds among landscapes within ecoregions , 2007 .

[25]  W. Jetz,et al.  Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Syntaxonomic diversity as an indicator of ecological diversity — case study Vranica Mts in the Central Bosnia , 2007, Biologia.

[27]  J. Lawesson.  A tentative annotated checklist of Danish syntaxa , 2004, Folia Geobotanica.

[28]  G. Sburlino,et al.  Il secondo aggiornamento della Lista sintassonomica italiana (2000-2004). , 2007 .

[29]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge , 2005 .

[30]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation , 2003 .

[31]  Jörg Ewald,et al.  A critique for phytosociology , 2003 .

[32]  J. Rodwell,et al.  PLANT COMMUNITIES OF ALBANIA - A PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW , 2002 .

[33]  Á. Penas,et al.  Syntaxonomical checklist of vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal to association level , 2001 .

[34]  P. Gioia,et al.  Species richness and endemism in the Western Australian flora. , 2000 .

[35]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  Common data standards for recording relevés in field survey for vegetation classification. , 2000 .

[36]  Jaroslav Moravec,et al.  International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 3rd edition , 2000 .

[37]  Michael Miersch,et al.  Life counts : eine globale Bilanz des Lebens , 2000 .

[38]  J. Rodwell,et al.  Review of coverage of the National Vegetation Classification , 2000 .

[39]  A. Stortelder,et al.  De vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 5 plantengemeenschappen van ruigten, struwelen en bossen , 1999 .

[40]  V. Westhoff,et al.  De vegetatie van Nederland 4; plantengemeenschappen van de kust en van binnenlandse pioniermilieus , 1998 .

[41]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  Classification of vegetation: past, present and future , 1997 .

[42]  V. Brovkin,et al.  A continuous climate-vegetation classification for use in climate-biosphere studies , 1997 .

[43]  Frédéric Médail,et al.  Hot-Spots Analysis for Conservation of Plant Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Basin , 1997 .

[44]  J. Schaminee,et al.  De Vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 3: Plantengemeenschappen van graslanden, zomen en droge heiden , 1996 .

[45]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  European Vegetation Survey: update on progress , 1995 .

[46]  O. W. Archibold.  Ecology of World Vegetation , 1994, Springer Netherlands.

[47]  V. Westhoff,et al.  De Vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 2: Plantengemeenschappen van wateren, moerassen en natte heiden , 1995 .

[48]  E. Maarel,et al.  The Braun-Blanquet Approach , 1978 .

[49]  M. El-Zawahry,et al.  Ë pideniiological features of intestinal parasitoses in Dayebo Village, Burma. , 1970 .