Coping with Messiness in Ethnography: Authority, Bias and Immersion in ethnographic Fieldwork in the non-Western World

Ethnography has firmly established its position in the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) community. Many studies have benefited from following ethnographic approaches to arrive at a grounded and comprehensive understanding of the respective research context. Applying that to the non-Western world, however, comes with challenges for researchers. Aside from ethical concerns which have been addressed in the past, we want to use this workshop to foster conversations and discussions on authority, bias and immersion when conducting ethnographic field work in the non-Western world – especially as a Western researcher. The main objective of this workshop is to exchange experiences and to identify common aspects and ways of overcoming, coping with or even embracing the messiness in ethnographic work and derive guidelines based on these discussions.

[1]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Fighting against the wall: social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village , 2013, CHI.

[2]  Lilly C. Irani,et al.  Chasing Innovation , 2019 .

[3]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  The Social Mile - How (Psychosocial) ICT can Help to Promote Resocialization and to Overcome Prison , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Reflections on 25 Years of Ethnography in CSCW , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[5]  Roisin McNaney,et al.  Ethical Encounters in HCI: Implications for Research in Sensitive Settings , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  Lydia B. Chilton,et al.  Embracing Uncertainty in HCI , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[8]  Christopher Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  The Space of Possibilities: Political Economies of Technology Innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2018, CHI.

[9]  David Nemer,et al.  Sensitive Research, Practice and Design in HCI , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Bryan C. Semaan,et al.  (Coping with) Messiness in Ethnography – Methods, Ethics and Participation in ethnographic Field Work in the non-Western World , 2020 .

[11]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Additional Labors of the Entrepreneurial Self , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  V. Wulf,et al.  Challenges of an Educational ICT Intervention : The Establishment of a MediaSpace in the High Atlas , 2019 .

[13]  P. Prasad Systems of meaning: ethnography as a methodology for the study of information technologies , 1997 .

[14]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Reflections on a Design Case Study - (Educational) ICT Intervention with Imazighen in Morocco , 2019, C&T.

[15]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Exploring the Potential of Exergames to affect the Social and Daily Life of People with Dementia and their Caregivers , 2018, CHI.

[16]  Jenny Waycott,et al.  Ethical Encounters in HCI: Research in Sensitive Settings , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  Jeanette Blomberg,et al.  An ethnographic approach to design , 2002 .

[18]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development , 2010, CHI.

[19]  Peter Tolmie,et al.  Doing Design Ethnography , 2012, Human–Computer Interaction Series.

[20]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Come_in@palestine: adapting a german computer club concept to a palestinian refugee camp , 2014, CABS '14.

[21]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Multisited Design: An Analytical Lens for Transnational HCI , 2014, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Shion Guha,et al.  Qualitative Methods for CSCW: Challenges and Opportunities , 2019, CSCW Companion.