Cartesian grid simulations of gas–solids flow systems with complex geometry

Complex geometries encountered in many applications of gas–solids flow need special treatment in most legacy multiphase flow solvers with Cartesian numerical grid. This paper briefly outlines the implementation of a cut cell technique in the open-source multiphase flow solver—MFIX for accurate representation of complex geometries. Specifically, applications of the Cartesian cut cell method to different gas–solids fluidization systems including a small scale bubbling fluidized bed with submerged tube bundle and a complete pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed will be presented. In addition to qualitative predictions on the general flow behaviors inside each system, quantitative comparison with the available experimental data will be presented. Furthermore, some results on extending the current cut-cell technique to Lagrangian–Eulerian simulations will be presented.

[1]  Hans Enwald,et al.  Fluid dynamics of a pressurized fluidized bed: comparison between numerical solutions from two-fluid models and experimental results , 1999 .

[2]  M. Syamlal,et al.  The effect of numerical diffusion on simulation of isolated bubbles in a gas-solid fluidized bed , 2001 .

[3]  Dong Hyun Lee,et al.  Heat transfer and bubble characteristics in a fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tube bundle , 2003 .

[4]  John R. Grace,et al.  Study of wall boundary condition in numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized beds , 2010 .

[5]  N. Anders Petersson,et al.  Hole-Cutting for Three-Dimensional Overlapping Grids , 1999, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  P. Tucker,et al.  A Cartesian cut cell method for incompressible viscous flow , 2000 .

[8]  Robert Meakin,et al.  Composite Overset Structured Grids , 1998 .

[9]  D. Snider.  An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows , 2001 .

[10]  Tim Colonius,et al.  The immersed boundary method: A projection approach , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  S. Armfield,et al.  A representation of curved boundaries for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on a staggered three-dimensional Cartesian grid , 2003 .

[12]  D. Gidaspow.  Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions , 1994 .

[13]  C. M. Albone,et al.  A flow-field solver using overlying and embedded meshes together with a novel compact Euler algorithm , 1989 .

[14]  Tingwen Li,et al.  Revisiting Johnson and Jackson boundary conditions for granular flows , 2012 .

[15]  M. Syamlal,et al.  MFIX documentation theory guide , 1993 .

[16]  J. Damasceno,et al.  Numerical simulation of two-dimensional flows over a circular cylinder using the immersed boundary method , 2003 .

[17]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Local heat transfer coefficients on the circumference of a tube in a gas fluidized bed , 1995 .

[18]  Todd Pugsley,et al.  Simulation and experimental validation of a freely bubbling bed of FCC catalyst , 2003 .

[19]  J. Ferziger,et al.  A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for flow in complex geometry , 2002 .

[20]  Derek M. Causon,et al.  Calculation of compressible flows about complex moving geometries using a three‐dimensional Cartesian cut cell method , 2000 .

[21]  C. Albone.  Embedded meshes of controllable quality synthesised from elementary geometric features , 1992 .

[22]  W. Shyy,et al.  Regular Article: An Accurate Cartesian Grid Method for Viscous Incompressible Flows with Complex Immersed Boundaries , 1999 .