Aortic Valve Thrombus in a Patient With an Extracorporeal Left Ventricular Assist Device: The Dilemma of Management.

PATIENTS with severely compromised left ventricular output undergo left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement for a variety of reasons. Intracorporeal (totally implantable) devices are placed either as bridge therapy to cardiac transplantation or as destination therapy in patients ineligible to undergo transplantation. Most modern devices are small and rely on impellers to produce axial, nonpulsatile flow in series with the left ventricle (LV). An example of such a device is the HeartMate II (Thoratec Corporation), which is approved by the FDA for both bridge-to-transplantation and destination therapy. In the setting of cardiogenic shock such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or significant insult to the LV during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), temporary extracorporeal devices may be used for circulatory support. In a patient with a sternotomy, typical cannulation sites are the left atrium and ascending aorta, resulting in flow that is in parallel to native LV flow. These devices are meant to be used as a bridge to recovery of myocardial function or as a bridge to a more definitive decision (such as intracorporeal LVAD or termination of care). An example of a device used in this setting is the Centrimags (Thoratecs Corporation) VAD, which also can be used for biventricular support if indicated. High flow through both types of devices can overpower and completely bypass the flow through the native left ventricular outflow tract. As a result, stasis of flow in the ascending aorta can occur, with reduced AV cusp excursion. This can contribute to perivalvular thrombus formation. Possible sequelae may include compromised coronary blood flow, heart failure, and embolic events such as AMI or cerebrovascular accident (CVA). The guidelines released in 2013 for mechanical circulatory support recommend warfarin with the optional addition of aspirin to prevent thrombotic complications in LVAD patients. On the flip side, mechanical shear stress from ventricular assist devices leads to an acquired von Willebrand factor deficiency and platelet dysfunction. This, along with pharmacologic anticoagulation, can place these patients at an increased risk for bleeding complications. Karimi et al have suggested that antiplatelet therapy titration with the utilization of thromboelastography may reduce bleeding risk in this population.

[1]  M C Oz,et al.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Oz,et al.  In vitro characterization of aortic retrograde and antegrade flow from pulsatile and non-pulsatile ventricular assist devices. , 2004, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  Biswajit Kar,et al.  The effect of LVAD aortic outflow-graft placement on hemodynamics and flow: Implantation technique and computer flow modeling. , 2005, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[4]  K. Serri,et al.  Thrombosis of prosthetic heart valves: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations , 2006, Heart.

[5]  T. MacGillivray,et al.  Perioperative Echocardiographic Examination for Ventricular Assist Device Implantation , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  96: Sustained Activation of Vascular Endothelium Induces the Tissue Factor Pathway in LVAD Recipients , 2008 .

[7]  J. Long,et al.  200: Aortic Valve/Root Thrombosis with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices , 2008 .

[8]  M. Firstenberg,et al.  Aortic valve thrombosis after implantation of temporary left ventricular assist device. , 2009, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[9]  R. John,et al.  The Biological Basis of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular translational research.

[10]  R. Koerfer,et al.  Thrombosis of the ascending aorta during mechanical circulatory support in a patient with cardiogenic shock. , 2010, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[11]  W. Zoghbi,et al.  The role of echocardiography and other imaging modalities in patients with left ventricular assist devices. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  V. Jeevanandam,et al.  Aortic root and valve thrombosis after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. , 2011, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[13]  A. Renzulli,et al.  What is the optimal anticoagulation in patients with a left ventricular assist device? , 2012, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[14]  Z. Demirozu,et al.  Aortic valve noncoronary cusp thrombosis after implantation of a nonpulsatile, continuous-flow pump. , 2012, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[15]  Nader Moazami,et al.  The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. , 2013, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  T. Nakatani,et al.  Left coronary artery occlusion caused by a large thrombus on the left coronary cusp in a patient with a continuous-flow ventricular assist device , 2014, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[17]  N. Uriel,et al.  Value of Serial Echo‐Guided Ramp Studies in a Patient with Suspicion of Device Thrombosis after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation , 2014, Echocardiography.

[18]  Chad E. Wagner,et al.  Hemodynamic transesophageal echocardiography after left ventricular assist device implantation. , 2014, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[19]  J. Aranda,et al.  Close antiplatelet therapy monitoring and adjustment based upon thrombelastography may reduce late-onset bleeding in HeartMate II recipients. , 2014, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[20]  K. May-Newman,et al.  Intraventricular flow patterns and stasis in the LVAD-assisted heart. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.