Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT.

PURPOSE To retrospectively compare image quality and radiation dose between a reduced-dose computed tomographic (CT) protocol that uses model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and a standard-dose CT protocol that uses 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with filtered back projection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained. Clinical CT images of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis obtained with a reduced-dose protocol were identified. Images were reconstructed with two algorithms: MBIR and 100% ASIR. All subjects had undergone standard-dose CT within the prior year, and the images were reconstructed with 30% ASIR. Reduced- and standard-dose images were evaluated objectively and subjectively. Reduced-dose images were evaluated for lesion detectability. Spatial resolution was assessed in a phantom. Radiation dose was estimated by using volumetric CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and calculated size-specific dose estimates (SSDE). A combination of descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and t tests was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS In the 25 patients who underwent the reduced-dose protocol, mean decrease in CTDI(vol) was 46% (range, 19%-65%) and mean decrease in SSDE was 44% (range, 19%-64%). Reduced-dose MBIR images had less noise (P > .004). Spatial resolution was superior for reduced-dose MBIR images. Reduced-dose MBIR images were equivalent to standard-dose images for lungs and soft tissues (P > .05) but were inferior for bones (P = .004). Reduced-dose 100% ASIR images were inferior for soft tissues (P < .002), lungs (P < .001), and bones (P < .001). By using the same reduced-dose acquisition, lesion detectability was better (38% [32 of 84 rated lesions]) or the same (62% [52 of 84 rated lesions]) with MBIR as compared with 100% ASIR. CONCLUSION CT performed with a reduced-dose protocol and MBIR is feasible in the pediatric population, and it maintains diagnostic quality.

[1]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  David H. Kim,et al.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Samuel L Brady,et al.  Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. , 2012, Radiology.

[4]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.

[5]  M. Körner,et al.  Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. , 2013, Radiology.

[6]  Daniel Kolditz,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. , 2012, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: System and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[8]  P. Schnyder,et al.  Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations , 2004, European Radiology.

[9]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique , 2012, European Radiology.

[10]  M. Cohen.  Pediatric CT radiation dose: how low can you go? , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[12]  James H Thrall,et al.  Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[13]  Division on Earth.  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[14]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Boone,et al.  Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations , 2011 .

[16]  Claude Nahmias,et al.  Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography , 2008, Pediatrics.

[17]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[18]  Mannudeep K. Kalra,et al.  Comparison of Hybrid and Pure Iterative Reconstruction Techniques With Conventional Filtered Back Projection: Dose Reduction Potential in the Abdomen , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  D. Frush.  Review of radiation issues for computed tomography. , 2004, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[20]  K. Strauss,et al.  The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography During the Late Hepatic Arterial Phase Using a Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: How Low Can We Go? , 2012, Investigative radiology.