Tensile Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Composites: II. Application to Polymer Matrix Composites

An analytic model for predicting the tensile strength of uniaxial fiber-reinforced composites is applied to several different graphite-fiber composites and shows good agreement with measured strengths. The model includes the effects of fiber statistical strength distribution, local load transfer from broken to unbroken fibers, interfacial shear strength, fiber pullout, and composite size. The model is applied in detail to AS-4 fiber/Epon828 matrix and T300 fiber/Epicote matrix composites, for which the requisite constituent and composite data are available in the literature. Data for the fiber strength at the critical length is obtained from single fiber composite experiments using the analysis of Curtin. For the AS-4/Epon828 material, the predicted tensile strength is 35% higher than the measured value if physical fiber volume fraction is used and 18% higher if a fiber volume fraction consistent with the measured composite Young's modulus is used. For the T300/Epicote system, the predicted strength is 35% higher if thermal stress effects in the s.f.c. test are neglected but only 20% higher if estimated thermal stresses are included. Strength predictions for an AS-4 fiber/thermoplastic matrix system and for two other T300 fiber-based composites are made using the same fiber strength data and comparable agreement (20%) is obtained. The theory predicts very modest changes in composite strength with increasing interfacial shear strengths, as observed experimentally. Overall, the model is in reasonable agreement with experiment when the constituent data is accurately determined, which establishes the model as the basic model for predicting uniaxial tensile strength in polymer matrix composites.

[1]  F. Leckie,et al.  Strength variability in alumina fiber-reinforced aluminum matrix composites , 1997 .

[2]  W. J. Padgett,et al.  Localized Load-Sharing Rules and Markov-Weibull Fibers: A Comparison of Microcomposite Failure Data with Monte Carlo Simulations , 1997 .

[3]  William A. Curtin,et al.  Strength and reliability of fiber-reinforced composites: Localized load-sharing and associated size effects , 1997 .

[4]  Chung-Yuen Hui,et al.  Size effects in the distribution for strength of brittle matrix fibrous composites , 1997 .

[5]  S. Leigh Phoenix,et al.  Stress concentrations around multiple fiber breaks in an elastic matrix with local yielding or debonding using quadratic influence superposition , 1996 .

[6]  William A. Curtin,et al.  Failure of fiber composites: A lattice Green function model , 1995 .

[7]  D. Dillard,et al.  The Effect of Fiber-Matrix Interphase Properties on the Quasi-Static Performance of Thermoplastic Composites , 1994 .

[8]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  A binary model of textile composites—I. Formulation , 1994 .

[9]  William A. Curtin,et al.  THEORY OF MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF CERAMIC-MATRIX COMPOSITES , 1991 .

[10]  William A. Curtin,et al.  Exact theory of fibre fragmentation in a single-filament composite , 1991 .

[11]  Lawrence T. Drzal,et al.  Fiber-Matrix Adhesion and Its Effect on Composite Mechanical Properties: II. Longitudinal (0°) and Transverse (90°) Tensile and Flexure Behavior of Graphite/Epoxy Composites , 1991 .

[12]  S. L. Phoenix,et al.  Weibull strength statistics for graphite fibres measured from the break progression in a model graphite/glass/epoxy microcomposite , 1991 .

[13]  S. Phoenix,et al.  Interfacial shear strength studies using the single‐filament‐composite test. Part II: A probability model and Monte Carlo simulation , 1989 .

[14]  J. P. Bell,et al.  Interfacial shear strength and failure modes of interphase-modified graphite-epoxy composites , 1989 .

[15]  Reza Ghaffarian,et al.  Size effect and strength variability of unidirectional composites , 1984 .

[16]  S. L. Phoenix,et al.  Lower-tail approximations for the probability of failure of three-dimensional fibrous composites with hexagonal geometry , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[17]  S. L. Phoenix,et al.  Asymptotic Distributions for the Failure of Fibrous Materials Under Series-Parallel Structure and Equal Load-Sharing , 1981 .

[18]  T. Chou,et al.  An Advanced Shear-Lag Model Applicable to Discontinuous Fiber Composites , 1981 .

[19]  C. Zweben,et al.  A statistical theory of material strength with application to composite materials , 1969 .

[20]  A. Argon,et al.  Statistical Theory of Strength of Laminated Composites II , 1969 .

[21]  John M. Hedgepeth,et al.  Local Stress Concentrations in Imperfect Filamentary Composite Materials , 1967 .

[22]  J. Gurland,et al.  Comparison of the statistics of two fracture modes , 1962 .

[23]  Bernard D. Coleman,et al.  On the strength of classical fibres and fibre bundles , 1958 .

[24]  T. Peijs,et al.  An experimental and numerical investigation into the single-fibre fragmentation test : stress transfer by a locally yielding matrix , 1997 .

[25]  S. Leigh Phoenix,et al.  Statistics for the strength and size effects of microcomposites with four carbon fibers in epoxy resin , 1996 .

[26]  J. Park,et al.  Strength distribution of Carborundum polycrystalline SiC fibres as derived from the single-fibre-composite test , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[27]  H. Fukuda,et al.  Micromechanical approach to the tensile strength of unidirectional composites , 1994 .

[28]  S. Ishibashi,et al.  Tensile Property and Its Variability On-Axis of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites. , 1991 .