Visual attention to features by associative learning

Expecting a particular stimulus can facilitate processing of that stimulus over others, but what is the fate of other stimuli that are known to co-occur with the expected stimulus? This study examined the impact of learned association on feature-based attention. The findings show that the effectiveness of an uninformative color transient in orienting attention can change by learned associations between colors and the expected target shape. In an initial acquisition phase, participants learned two distinct sequences of stimulus-response-outcome, where stimuli were defined by shape ('S' vs. 'H'), responses were localized key-presses (left vs. right), and outcomes were colors (red vs. green). Next, in a test phase, while expecting a target shape (80% probable), participants showed reliable attentional orienting to the color transient associated with the target shape, and showed no attentional orienting with the color associated with the alternative target shape. This bias seemed to be driven by learned association between shapes and colors, and not modulated by the response. In addition, the bias seemed to depend on observing target-color conjunctions, since encountering the two features disjunctively (without spatiotemporal overlap) did not replicate the findings. We conclude that associative learning - likely mediated by mechanisms underlying visual object representation - can extend the impact of goal-driven attention to features associated with a target stimulus.

[1]  M. Ziessler,et al.  The Temporal Dynamics of Effect Anticipation in Course of Action Planning , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[3]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Eiling Yee,et al.  Colorless Green Ideas (Can) Prime Furiously , 2012, Psychological science.

[5]  J. Brockmole,et al.  Hand proximity differentially affects visual working memory for color and orientation in a binding task , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[6]  Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing , 2013, Psychological research.

[7]  J Miller,et al.  Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Behrmann,et al.  The Space of an Object: Object Attention Alters the Spatial Gradient in the Surround by Virtue of the Object's Presence, Spatial Regions of the Visual , 2022 .

[9]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  T. DeMarse,et al.  Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations. , 1996 .

[11]  D. LaBerge Attention and the measurement of perceptual learning , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Specialization in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe , 2005 .

[13]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[15]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Attentional Capture Does Not Depend on Feature Similarity, but on Target-Nontarget Relations , 2013, Psychological science.

[16]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Learning at any rate: action–effect learning for stimulus-based actions , 2011, Psychological research.

[17]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention and short-term memory (NTVA) , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  The role of relational information in contingent capture. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. Pratt,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General The Cost and Benefit of Implicit Spatial Cues for Visual Attention , 2012 .

[20]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape , 2003, Nature.

[22]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[24]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The relationship between feature binding and consciousness: Evidence from asynchronous multi-modal stimuli , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[25]  J. Tipples Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Arvid Herwig,et al.  Intention and attention in ideomotor learning. , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  G Westheimer,et al.  Contrast and duration of exposure differentially affect vernier and stereoscopic acuity , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  B. Hommel The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation , 2000 .

[29]  B. Hommel Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Neelam Naikar,et al.  A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention , 1999 .

[33]  K Nakayama,et al.  Rapid, Object-Based Learning in the Deployment of Transient Attention , 2001, Perception.

[34]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[35]  B. Hommel,et al.  Intentional weighting: a basic principle in cognitive control , 2012, Psychological research.

[36]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Associative Learning Mechanisms in Vision , 2008 .

[37]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Remington,et al.  Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture , 2006 .

[39]  Grasping the past and present: When does visuomotor priming occur? , 2006 .

[40]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Probability Cuing of Target Location Facilitates Visual Search Implicitly in Normal Participants and Patients with Hemispatial Neglect , 2002, Psychological science.

[41]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  M. A. Trapold,et al.  Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different , 1970 .

[43]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect , 2004, Psychological research.

[44]  H. Spencer The Principles of Psychology - Vol. I , 2016 .

[45]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Reduced visual feature binding in the near-hand space , 2014, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[47]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  Nicholas B. Turk-Browne,et al.  Memory-guided attention: control from multiple memory systems , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[51]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[53]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  A. Lambert,et al.  Effects of informative peripheral cues on eye movements: Revisiting William James’ “derived attention” , 2000 .

[55]  Bryan R. Burnham,et al.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display’s appearance can mediate attentional capture , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  The first half second : the microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes , 2006 .

[57]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[59]  H. Müller,et al.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  A. Nobre,et al.  Long-term memory prepares neural activity for perception , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Anticipation of visual form independent of knowing where the form will occur , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[62]  G. Remillard Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[64]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Automatic spread of attentional response modulation along Gestalt criteria in primary visual cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[65]  Morgan D. Barense,et al.  The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  AÂ rni KristjaÂnsson Rapid learning in attention shifts : A review , 2005 .

[67]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[68]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control , 2001 .

[69]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[70]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Learned Predictiveness Speeds Visual Processing , 2012, Psychological science.

[71]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[72]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[73]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Two Modes of Sensorimotor Integration in Intention-Based and Stimulus-Based Actions , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[74]  M. Bar The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[76]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.