Structure-based shape pharmacophore modeling for the discovery of novel anesthetic compounds.

Current anesthetics, especially the inhaled ones, have troublesome side effects and may be associated with durable changes in cognition. It is therefore highly desirable to develop novel chemical entities that reduce these effects while preserving or enhancing anesthetic potency. In spite of progress toward identifying protein targets involved in anesthesia, we still do not have the necessary atomic level structural information to delineate their interactions with anesthetic molecules. Recently, we have described a protein target, apoferritin, to which several anesthetics bind specifically and in a pharmacodynamically relevant manner. Further, we have reported the high resolution X-ray structure of two anesthetic/apoferritin complexes (Liu, R.; Loll, P. J.; Eckenhoff, R. G. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 567). Thus, we describe in this paper a structure-based approach to establish validated shape pharmacophore models for future application to virtual and high throughput screening of anesthetic compounds. We use the 3D structure of apoferritin as the basis for the development of several shape pharmacophore models. To validate these models, we demonstrate that (1) they can be used to effectively recover known anesthetic agents from a diverse database of compounds; (2) the shape pharmacophore scores afford a significant linear correlation with the measured binding energetics of several known anesthetic compounds to the apoferritin site; and (3) the computed scores based on the shape pharmacophore models also predict the trend of the EC(50) values of a set of anesthetics. Therefore, we have now obtained a set of structure-based shape pharmacophore models, using ferritin as the surrogate target, which may afford a new way to rationally discover novel anesthetic agents in the future.

[1]  J. Johansson,et al.  Four-alpha-helix bundle with designed anesthetic binding pockets. Part I: structural and dynamical analyses. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[2]  M. Klein,et al.  Identification of a fluorescent general anesthetic, 1-aminoanthracene , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Olney,et al.  Early Exposure to Common Anesthetic Agents Causes Widespread Neurodegeneration in the Developing Rat Brain and Persistent Learning Deficits , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Weifan Zheng,et al.  Novel Approach to Structure-Based Pharmacophore Search Using Computational Geometry and Shape Matching Techniques , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[5]  Jie Liang,et al.  CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[7]  S. Curry,et al.  Binding of the General Anesthetics Propofol and Halothane to Human Serum Albumin , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  H. Edelsbrunner,et al.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Thierry Langer,et al.  Comparative Performance Assessment of the Conformational Model Generators Omega and Catalyst: A Large-Scale Survey on the Retrieval of Protein-Bound Ligand Conformations , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  R. Eckenhoff,et al.  Molecular interactions between inhaled anesthetics and proteins. , 1997, Pharmacological reviews.

[12]  Gareth Jones,et al.  A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation , 1995, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[13]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4 , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[14]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 study , 1998, The Lancet.

[15]  J. Johansson,et al.  Four-alpha-helix bundle with designed anesthetic binding pockets. Part II: halothane effects on structure and dynamics. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[16]  E. Korpi,et al.  Biological function of GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor heterogeneity. , 1995, Journal of psychiatric research.

[17]  Multiple specific binding targets for inhaled anesthetics in the mammalian brain. , 2002, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[18]  R. Eckenhoff,et al.  Structural basis for high‐affinity volatile anesthetic binding in a natural 4‐helix bundle protein , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[19]  J. A. Grant,et al.  Gaussian docking functions. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[20]  M. Eckenhoff,et al.  Halothane binding proteome in human brain cortex. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[21]  Thierry Langer,et al.  LigandScout: 3-D Pharmacophores Derived from Protein-Bound Ligands and Their Use as Virtual Screening Filters , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[22]  Jie Liang,et al.  CASTp: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  B. Orser,et al.  Emerging molecular mechanisms of general anesthetic action. , 2005, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[24]  A J Hopfinger,et al.  4D-QSAR analysis of a set of propofol analogues: mapping binding sites for an anesthetic phenol on the GABA(A) receptor. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.