CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse

How T cells respond with extraordinary sensitivity to minute amounts of agonist peptide and major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules on the surface of antigen-presenting cells bearing large numbers of endogenous pMHC molecules is not understood. Here we present evidence that CD4 affects the responsiveness of T helper cells by controlling spatial localization of the tyrosine kinase Lck in the synapse. This finding, as well as further in silico and in vitro experiments, led us to develop a molecular model in which endogenous and agonist pMHC molecules act cooperatively to amplify T cell receptor signaling. At the same time, activation due to endogenous pMHC molecules alone is inhibited. A key feature is that the binding of agonist pMHC molecules to the T cell receptor results in CD4-mediated spatial localization of Lck, which in turn enables endogenous pMHC molecules to trigger many T cell receptors. We also discuss broader implications for T cell biology, including thymic selection, diversity of the repertoire of self pMHC molecules and serial triggering.

[1]  David M Kranz,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. , 2003, Immunity.

[2]  W. Hendrickson,et al.  Analysis of the contact sites on the CD4 molecule with class II MHC molecule: co-ligand versus co-receptor function. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[3]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[4]  Christoph Wülfing,et al.  Costimulation and endogenous MHC ligands contribute to T cell recognition , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[5]  E. Engleman,et al.  CD4 molecules are associated with the antigen receptor complex on activated but not resting T cells. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[6]  P. Allen,et al.  Regulation of Lck activity by CD4 and CD28 in the immunological synapse , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[7]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[8]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[9]  R. Lechler,et al.  Amino Acid Substitutions in the Putative MHC Class II “Dimer of Dimers” Interface Inhibit CD4+ T Cell Activation , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  Ellis L. Reinherz,et al.  Crystal structure of the human CD4 N-terminal two-domain fragment complexed to a class II MHC molecule , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Smolyar,et al.  Oligomerization of CD4 is required for stable binding to class II major histocompatibility complex proteins but not for interaction with human immunodeficiency virus gp120. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  O. Rafaelsen.  Personal View , 1987, British medical journal.

[13]  R. Germain,et al.  Involvement of both major histocompatibility complex class II alpha and beta chains in CD4 function indicates a role for ordered oligomerization in T cell activation , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Fluctuations and quality of control in biological cells: zero-order ultrasensitivity reinvestigated. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Charles A. Janeway,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:How the immune system works to protect the host from infection: A personal view , 2001 .

[17]  W. Ebeling.  Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[18]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  The Immunological Synapse Balances T Cell Receptor Signaling and Degradation , 2003, Science.

[19]  C. Janeway.  The T cell receptor as a multicomponent signalling machine: CD4/CD8 coreceptors and CD45 in T cell activation. , 1992, Annual review of immunology.

[20]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Linking molecular and cellular events in T-cell activation and synapse formation. , 2003, Seminars in immunology.

[21]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  F. Lemonnier,et al.  Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naïve or memory T cells. , 1997, Science.

[23]  R. Germain,et al.  Self-recognition promotes the foreign antigen sensitivity of naive T lymphocytes , 2002, Nature.

[24]  A. Felsenfeld.  The power of one. , 2006, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[25]  T. L. Collins,et al.  p56lck association with CD4 is required for the interaction between CD4 and the TCR/CD3 complex and for optimal antigen stimulation. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[26]  R. Cherry,et al.  Detection of Dimers of Dimers of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)–DR on the Surface of Living Cells by Single-Particle Fluorescence Imaging , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  L. Samelson,et al.  Signal transduction through the CD4 receptor involves the activation of the internal membrane tyrosine-protein kinase p56lck , 1989, Nature.

[28]  W. Hendrickson,et al.  Dimeric association and segmental variability in the structure of human CD4 , 1997, Nature.

[29]  T. Jardetzky,et al.  The structure of MHC class II: a role for dimer of dimers. , 1995, Seminars in immunology.

[30]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[31]  J. Putney,et al.  A model for receptor-regulated calcium entry. , 1986, Cell calcium.

[32]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Supplementary information for Activated TCRs remain marked for internalization after dissociation from pMHC , 2022 .

[33]  J. Strominger,et al.  Interactions of CD4 with MHC class II molecules, T cell receptors and p56lck. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[35]  Michael A. Bookman,et al.  The CD4 and CD8 T cell surface antigens are associated with the internal membrane tyrosine-protein kinase p56 lck , 1988, Cell.

[36]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Dynamics of p56lck translocation to the T cell immunological synapse following agonist and antagonist stimulation. , 2002, Immunity.

[37]  Xiaoli Shen,et al.  Involvement of Both Major Histocompatibility Complex Class 1I and/ Chains in CD4 Function Indicates a Role for Ordered Oligomerization in T Cell Activation , 2003 .

[38]  Ellis L. Reinherz,et al.  T Cell Receptor Binding to a pMHCII Ligand Is Kinetically Distinct from and Independent of CD4* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  W. Hendrickson,et al.  CD4 Dimers Constitute the Functional Component Required for T Cell Activation1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[41]  D E Koshland,et al.  Sensitivity amplification in biochemical systems , 1982, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[42]  M. Bevan,et al.  Selecting and maintaining a diverse T-cell repertoire , 1999, Nature.

[43]  D. Kranz,et al.  Cd8− T Cell Transfectants That Express a High Affinity T Cell Receptor Exhibit Enhanced Peptide-Dependent Activation , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[44]  P. Fink,et al.  Correlations between T-cell specificity and the structure of the antigen receptor , 1986, Nature.

[45]  T. Satoh,et al.  CD4 dimerization and oligomerization: implications for T-cell function and structure-based drug design. , 1998, Immunology today.

[46]  J. Parnes,et al.  Role of CD4 and CD8 in T cell activation and differentiation. , 1993, Advances in immunology.

[47]  A. Sloane,et al.  Direct evidence for native CD4 oligomers in lymphoid and monocytoid cells , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[48]  C. Janeway,et al.  Paradoxical intrathymic positive selection in mice with only a covalently presented agonist peptide , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[50]  P. Anderson,et al.  Molecular Interactions, T‐Cell Subsets and a Role of the CD4/CD8:p56lck Complex in Human T‐Cell Activation , 1989, Immunological reviews.

[51]  D. Littman,et al.  A kinase-independent function of Lck in potentiating antigen-specific T cell activation , 1993, Cell.

[52]  D. Sherrington.  Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[53]  R. Germain.  T-cell Activation: The Power of One , 2003, Current Biology.

[54]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Dynamics of cell surface molecules during T cell recognition. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[55]  J. Strominger,et al.  Interaction between CD4 and class II MHC molecules mediates cell adhesion , 1987, Nature.