Visual perception of contrastive focus in reiterant French speech

The aim of this paper is to study how contrastive focus is conveyed by prosody both articulatorily and acoustically and how viewers extract focus structure from visual prosodic realizations. Is the visual modality useful for the perception of prosody? An audiovisual corpus was recorded from a male native speaker of French. The sentences had a subject-verb-object (SVO) structure. Four contrastive focus conditions were studied: focus on each phrase (S, V or O) and broad focus. Normal and reiterant modes were recorded, only the latter was studied. An acoustic validation (fundamental frequency, duration and intensity) showed that the speaker had pronounced the utterances with a typical focused intonation on the focused phrase. Then, lip height and jaw opening were extracted from the video data. An articulatory analysis suggested a set of possible visual cues to focus for rei\terant /ma/ speech: (a) prefocal lengthening, (b) large jaw opening and high opening velocities on all the focused syllables; (c) long lip closure for the first focused syllable and (d) hypo-articulation (reduced jaw opening and duration) of the following phrases. A visual perception test was developed. It showed that (a) contrastive focus was well perceived visually for reiterant speech; (b) no training was necessary and (c) subject focus was slightly easier to identify than the other focus conditions. We also found that if the visual cues identified in our articulatory analysis were present and marked, perception was enhanced. This enables us to assume that the visual cues extracted from the corpus are probably the ones which are indeed perceptively salient.

[1]  Annie Rialland,et al.  Are There Cleft Sentences in French , 1999 .

[2]  A. B.,et al.  SPEECH COMMUNICATION , 2001 .

[3]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework , 2003 .

[4]  J. Vaissière,et al.  Langues, prosodies et syntaxe : Prosodie et syntaxe , 1997 .

[5]  A. D. Dominicis,et al.  Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages , 1999 .

[6]  D. Ingvar,et al.  Disturbances of speech prosody following right hemisphere infarcts , 1991, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[7]  Paul Touati,et al.  Structures prosodiques du suédois et du français : profils temporels et configurations tonales , 1987 .

[8]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1992, Language.

[9]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Disturbances in prosody. A right-hemisphere contribution to language. , 1981, Archives of neurology.

[10]  Mark Liberman,et al.  Use of nonsense‐syllable mimicry in the study of prosodic phenomena , 1976 .

[11]  D. Dahan,et al.  Interspeaker Variability in Emphatic Accent Production in French , 1996, Language and speech.

[12]  John Kingston,et al.  Salient pitch cues in the perception of contrastive focus , 1994 .

[13]  C. Fougeron,et al.  Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation , 2002 .

[14]  Denis Burnham,et al.  Visual Discrimination of Cantonese Tone by Ton Speakers , and by Non-Tonal Languag , 2001 .

[15]  AN INVESTIGATION OF ARTICULATORY CORRELATES OF THE ACCENTUAL PHRASE IN FRENCH , 1999 .

[16]  Brechtje Post,et al.  Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation , 2000 .

[17]  Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie,et al.  The Prosody of post-focus sequences in French , 2004 .

[18]  Björn Granström,et al.  PROSODIC CUES IN MULTIMODAL SPEECH PERCEPTION , 1999 .

[19]  K. D. Jong The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation , 1995 .

[20]  D. Erickson Effects of Contrastive Emphasis on Jaw Opening , 1998, Phonetica.

[21]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[22]  J. Harrington,et al.  Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: evidence from jaw movement data , 1995 .

[23]  Karen Bryan,et al.  Language prosody and the right hemisphere , 1989 .

[24]  J. Kelso,et al.  A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Beckman,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics , 1992 .

[26]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  Sentence comprehension by Broca's aphasics: Effects of some suprasegmental variables , 1982, Brain and Language.

[27]  Paul Fraisse,et al.  Psychologie du temps , 1959 .

[28]  Mohamed Tahar Lallouache,et al.  Un poste "visage-parole" couleur : acquisition et traitement automatique des contours des lèvres , 1991 .

[29]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[30]  Sun-Ah Jun,et al.  A Phonological Model of French Intonation , 2000 .

[31]  Antonis Botinis Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology , 2000 .

[32]  P. Mertens,et al.  Intonational grouping, boundaries, and syntactic structure in French , 1993 .

[33]  L. Larkey,et al.  Reiterant speech: an acoustic and perceptual validation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  W. V. Summers Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: articulatory and acoustic analyses. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Roxane Bertrand,et al.  About the relationship between eyebrow movements and Fo variations , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[36]  Laurice Tuller,et al.  The grammar of focus , 1999 .

[37]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Testing the Reality of Focus Domains , 1983 .

[38]  A. Cristo,et al.  PROSODIC ORGANISATION AND PHRASING AFTER FOCUS IN FRENCH Albert Di Cristo , 1999 .

[39]  A. D. Cristo,et al.  Rythme syllabique, rythme mélodique et représentatin hiérarchique de la prosodie du français , 1993 .

[40]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Focus and tonal structure in Neapolitan Italian , 2001, Speech Commun..

[41]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[42]  Kenneth L. Pike On the Grammar of Intonation , 1965 .