Rapid remodeling of retinal arbors in the tectum with and without blockade of synaptic transmission

Dynamic rearrangements of axon terminal arbors may be critical for establishing appropriate connections in the developing nervous system. Here, the changes in complex retinal axon arbors in the tecta of live Xenopus larvae were followed during the formation of the topographic retinotectal projection. Three-dimensional reconstructions of terminal arbors made with a confocal microscope at hourly intervals revealed rapid remodeling of arbor extensions. Shorter branches were extended and retracted very rapidly, suggesting that they probe the environment for the optimal sites to form stable branches. About 27% of longer branches were present throughout the entire observation period and may be sites of stabilized synaptic contacts. Treatment of the animals to block postsynaptic activity resulted in increased rates of arbor rearrangements, which may coincide with decreased synapse stability. These studies reveal the dynamic behavior of nerve arbors and provide estimates for the lifetimes of retinotectal branches.

[1]  S B Udin,et al.  Formation of topographic maps. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  M. Constantine‐Paton,et al.  The contributions of NMDA, non-NMDA, and GABA receptors to postsynaptic responses in neurons of the optic tectum , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  S E Fraser,et al.  Fiber optic mapping of the Xenopus visual system: shift in the retinotectal projection during development. , 1983, Developmental biology.

[4]  D. Bentley,et al.  Disoriented pathfinding by pioneer neurone growth cones deprived of filopodia by cytochalasin treatment , 1986, Nature.

[5]  E. Kandel,et al.  Modulation of an NCAM-related adhesion molecule with long-term synaptic plasticity in Aplysia. , 1992, Science.

[6]  Hollis T. Cline,et al.  NMDA receptor antagonists disrupt the retinotectal topographic map , 1989, Neuron.

[7]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The development of the tectum in Xenopus laevis: an autoradiographic study. , 1972, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[8]  E R Kandel,et al.  Serotonin-mediated endocytosis of apCAM: an early step of learning-related synaptic growth in Aplysia. , 1992, Science.

[9]  W. Harris,et al.  Axonal pathfinding in the absence of normal pathways and impulse activity , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  N. O’Rourke,et al.  Pattern regulation in the eyebud of Xenopus studied with a vital-dye fiber-tracing technique. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[11]  C. Holt,et al.  Retinal axons with and without their somata, growing to and arborizing in the tectum of Xenopus embryos: a time-lapse video study of single fibres in vivo. , 1987, Development.

[12]  S. Easter,et al.  Postembryonic growth of the optic tectum in goldfish. I. Location of germinal cells and numbers of neurons produced , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Debski,et al.  Chronic application of NMDA decreases the NMDA sensitivity of the evoked tectal potential in the frog , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Stryker,et al.  Development of individual geniculocortical arbors in cat striate cortex and effects of binocular impulse blockade , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Quantitative autoradiographic localization of NMDA, quisqualate and PCP receptors in the frog tectum , 1989, Brain Research.

[16]  C. Holt,et al.  Navigational errors made by growth cones without filopodia in the embryonic xenopus brain , 1993, Neuron.

[17]  Jeff W. Lichtman,et al.  Principles of neural development , 1985 .

[18]  D. Mastronarde Correlated firing of retinal ganglion cells , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  H. Cline Activity-dependent plasticity in the visual systems of frogs and fish , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  W. Harris,et al.  The effects of eliminating impulse activity on the development of the retinotectal projection in salamanders , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The growth of the retina in Xenopus laevis: an autoradiographic study. , 1971, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[22]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The evolution of the retinotectal map during development in Xenopus , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The relationship between retinal and tectal growth in larval Xenopus: implications for the development of the retino-tectal projection. , 1979, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[24]  C. Holt,et al.  Does timing of axon outgrowth influence initial retinotectal topography in Xenopus? , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  M W Levine,et al.  Common noise in the firing of neighbouring ganglion cells in goldfish retina. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Patterns of cell proliferation in the retina of the clawed frog during development , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  S. Easter,et al.  An evaluation of the hypothesis of shifting terminals in goldfish optic tectum , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Buchanan,et al.  Studies of nerve-muscle interactions in Xenopus cell culture: fine structure of early functional contacts , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  N. O’Rourke,et al.  Dynamic aspects of retinotectal map formation revealed by a vital-dye fiber-tracing technique. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[30]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  Dynamic changes in optic fiber terminal arbors lead to retinotopic map formation: An in vivo confocal microscopic study , 1990, Neuron.

[31]  T. Reh,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell terminals change their projection sites during larval development of Rana pipiens , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Sur,et al.  Disruption of retinogeniculate afferent segregation by antagonists to NMDA receptors , 1991, Nature.

[33]  D. Edwards,et al.  Intraocular injection of tetrodotoxin in goldfish decreases fast axonal transport of [3H]glucosamine-labeled materials in optic axons , 1984, Brain Research.

[34]  L. Landmesser,et al.  Polysialic acid as a regulator of intramuscular nerve branching during embryonic development , 1990, Neuron.

[35]  J. Faber,et al.  Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin) , 1958 .

[36]  R. Hunt,et al.  A physiological measure of shifting connections in the Rana pipiens retinotectal system. , 1986, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[37]  C. Shatz Impulse activity and the patterning of connections during cns development , 1990, Neuron.

[38]  D H Perkel,et al.  Competitive and positional cues in the patterning of nerve connections. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[39]  R. Murphey,et al.  Map formation in the developing Xenopus retinotectal system: an examination of ganglion cell terminal arborizations , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  B. Rohrer,et al.  Development of the retinotectal projection in zebrafish embryos under TTX-induced neural-impulse blockade , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Constantine-Paton,et al.  N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists disrupt the formation of a mammalian neural map. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  H. Cline,et al.  NMDA receptor agonist and antagonists alter retinal ganglion cell arbor structure in the developing frog retinotectal projection , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  S. Udin,et al.  Physiological effects of chronic and acute application of N-methyl-d-aspartate and 5-amino-phosphonovaleric acid to the optic tectum of Rana pipiens frogs , 1992, Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Constantine-Paton,et al.  Patterned activity, synaptic convergence, and the NMDA receptor in developing visual pathways. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  M. Poo,et al.  Studies of nerve-muscle interactions in Xenopus cell culture: analysis of early synaptic currents , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  William A. Harris,et al.  Order in the initial retinotectal map in Xenopus: a new technique for labelling growing nerve fibres , 1983, Nature.

[47]  R J Kaethner,et al.  Dynamics of terminal arbor formation and target approach of retinotectal axons in living zebrafish embryos: a time-lapse study of single axons , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  M. G. Honig,et al.  Physiological properties of newly formed synapses between sympathetic preganglionic neurons and sympathetic ganglion neurons. , 1991, Journal of neurobiology.

[49]  R. B. Langdon,et al.  Antagonists of glutaminergic neurotransmission block retinotectal transmission in goldfish , 1986, Brain Research.