Differential dependency network analysis to identify condition-specific topological changes in biological networks

MOTIVATION Significant efforts have been made to acquire data under different conditions and to construct static networks that can explain various gene regulation mechanisms. However, gene regulatory networks are dynamic and condition-specific; under different conditions, networks exhibit different regulation patterns accompanied by different transcriptional network topologies. Thus, an investigation on the topological changes in transcriptional networks can facilitate the understanding of cell development or provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of certain diseases, and help identify the key genetic players that could serve as biomarkers or drug targets. RESULTS Here, we report a differential dependency network (DDN) analysis to detect statistically significant topological changes in the transcriptional networks between two biological conditions. We propose a local dependency model to represent the local structures of a network by a set of conditional probabilities. We develop an efficient learning algorithm to learn the local dependency model using the Lasso technique. A permutation test is subsequently performed to estimate the statistical significance of each learned local structure. In testing on a simulation dataset, the proposed algorithm accurately detected all the genes with network topological changes. The method was then applied to the estrogen-dependent T-47D estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer cell line datasets and human and mouse embryonic stem cell datasets. In both experiments using real microarray datasets, the proposed method produced biologically meaningful results. We expect DDN to emerge as an important bioinformatics tool in transcriptional network analyses. While we focus specifically on transcriptional networks, the DDN method we introduce here is generally applicable to other biological networks with similar characteristics. AVAILABILITY The DDN MATLAB toolbox and experiment data are available at http://www.cbil.ece.vt.edu/software.htm.

[1]  Rebecca B. Riggins,et al.  Synergistic Promotion of c-Src Activation and Cell Migration by Cas and AND-34/BCAR3* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Robert Clarke,et al.  Estrogen Withdrawal-Induced NF-κB Activity and Bcl-3 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells: Roles in Growth and Hormone Independence , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[3]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso , 2006, math/0608017.

[4]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Ensemble dependence model for classification and prediction of cancer and normal gene expression data , 2005, Bioinform..

[5]  S. Horvath,et al.  Weighted gene coexpression network analysis strategies applied to mouse weight , 2007, Mammalian Genome.

[6]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[7]  Q. Ye,et al.  Ligand-independent activation of estrogen receptor alpha by XBP-1. , 2003, Nucleic Acids Research.

[8]  Ming Zhan,et al.  Conservation and variation of gene regulation in embryonic stem cells assessed by comparative genomics , 2005, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[9]  Yi Zheng,et al.  AND-34 activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and induces anti-estrogen resistance in a SH2 and GDP exchange factor-like domain-dependent manner. , 2005, Molecular cancer research : MCR.

[10]  M. Kuo,et al.  Roles of multidrug resistance genes in breast cancer chemoresistance. , 2007, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[11]  Kathleen Marchal,et al.  SynTReN: a generator of synthetic gene expression data for design and analysis of structure learning algorithms , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  Rainer Spang,et al.  Finding disease specific alterations in the co-expression of genes , 2004, ISMB/ECCB.

[13]  E. Gehan,et al.  The properties of high-dimensional data spaces: implications for exploring gene and protein expression data , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  S. Rafii,et al.  Splitting vessels: Keeping lymph apart from blood , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[15]  M. Zhan,et al.  Genomic studies to explore self-renewal and differentiation properties of embryonic stem cells. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[16]  Allen Chong,et al.  Discovery of estrogen receptor α target genes and response elements in breast tumor cells , 2004, Genome Biology.

[17]  A. Brivanlou,et al.  Molecular signature of human embryonic stem cells and its comparison with the mouse. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[18]  Michal Linial,et al.  Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[19]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Systems Biology and New Technologies Enable Predictive and Preventative Medicine , 2004, Science.

[20]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[21]  Dirk Husmeier,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of inferring genetic regulatory interactions from microarray experiments with dynamic Bayesian networks , 2003, Bioinform..

[22]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Jongdae Lee,et al.  IAP Suppression of Apoptosis Involves Distinct Mechanisms: the TAK1/JNK1 Signaling Cascade and Caspase Inhibition , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  Patrick Englebienne,et al.  Chronic fatigue syndrome : a biological approach , 2002 .

[25]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[26]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Integrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  Chiara Sabatti,et al.  Network component analysis: Reconstruction of regulatory signals in biological systems , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Choh Hao Li Vitamins and hormones : advances in research and applications , 1956 .

[29]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  In Response to Comment on "Network-constrained regularization and variable selection for analysis of genomic data" , 2008, Bioinform..

[30]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Inferring Cellular Networks Using Probabilistic Graphical Models , 2004, Science.

[31]  Henry Yang,et al.  Mechanisms controlling embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. , 2006, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[32]  S. Vacher,et al.  Identification of novel genes that co-cluster with estrogen receptor alpha in breast tumor biopsy specimens, using a large-scale real-time reverse transcription-PCR approach. , 2006, Endocrine-related cancer.

[33]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  R. Fulthorpe,et al.  Identification of estrogen-responsive genes by complementary deoxyribonucleic acid microarray and characterization of a novel early estrogen-induced gene: EEIG1. , 2004, Molecular endocrinology.

[35]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  A Markov random field model for network-based analysis of genomic data , 2007, Bioinform..

[36]  Dihua Yu,et al.  Breast cancer chemosensitivity , 2007 .

[37]  R. Riggins,et al.  Breast cancer antiestrogen resistance-3 expression regulates breast cancer cell migration through promotion of p130Cas membrane localization and membrane ruffling. , 2007, Cancer research.

[38]  R. Clarke,et al.  Human X‐Box binding protein‐1 confers both estrogen independence and antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer cell lines , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[39]  L. Glimcher,et al.  The X‐box binding protein‐1 transcription factor is required for plasma cell differentiation and the unfolded protein response , 2003, Immunological reviews.

[40]  Sangsoo Kim,et al.  Gene expression Differential coexpression analysis using microarray data and its application to human cancer , 2005 .

[41]  Jeremy J. W. Chen,et al.  Topology-based cancer classification and related pathway mining using microarray data , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[42]  M. Smid,et al.  Functional identification of genes causing estrogen independence of human breast cancer cells , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[43]  Robert Clarke,et al.  Antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors, and apoptosis in breast cancer. , 2005, Vitamins and hormones.

[44]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Dependence network modeling for biomarker identification , 2007, Bioinform..

[45]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[46]  Y. Wang,et al.  Inferring regulatory networks. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[47]  Q. Ye,et al.  Ligand‐independent activation of estrogen receptor α by XBP‐1 , 2003 .

[48]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Modeling T-cell activation using gene expression profiling and state-space models , 2004, Bioinform..

[49]  M. Merville,et al.  NF- kappa B2/p100 induces Bcl-2 expression. , 2003, Leukemia.

[50]  R. Riggins,et al.  Pathways to tamoxifen resistance. , 2007, Cancer letters.

[51]  David Maxwell Chickering,et al.  Dependency Networks for Inference, Collaborative Filtering, and Data Visualization , 2000, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[52]  Ying Liu,et al.  Cross-species transcriptional profiles establish a functional portrait of embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Genomics.

[53]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks , 2002, Bioinform..

[54]  Anthony Howell,et al.  Pure oestrogen antagonists for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. , 2006, Endocrine-related cancer.

[55]  Peng Zhao,et al.  On Model Selection Consistency of Lasso , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[56]  William Rostène,et al.  Hormonal regulation of apoptosis in breast cells and tissues , 2000, Steroids.

[57]  Ying Liu,et al.  Genome wide profiling of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), their derivatives and embryonal carcinoma cells to develop base profiles of U.S. Federal government approved hESC lines , 2006, BMC Developmental Biology.

[58]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes , 2004, Nature.

[59]  Xiao Yang,et al.  XBP-1 increases ERalpha transcriptional activity through regulation of large-scale chromatin unfolding. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[60]  Hyunsoo Kim,et al.  Unraveling condition specific gene transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[61]  Michael Watson,et al.  CoXpress: differential co-expression in gene expression data , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[62]  William Rostène,et al.  Antiestrogens are pro‐apoptotic in normal human breast epithelial cells , 2003, International journal of cancer.