A review on coal‐to‐liquid fuels and its coal consumption

Continued reliance on oil is unsustainable and this has resulted in interest in alternative fuels. Coal-to-liquids (CTL) can supply liquid fuels and have been successfully used in several cases, particularly in South Africa. This article reviews CTL theory and technology. Understanding the fundamental aspects of coal liquefaction technologies is vital for planning and policy-making, as future CTL systems will be integrated in a much larger global energy and fuel utilization system. Conversion ratios for CTL are generally estimated to be between 1 and 2 barrels/ton coal. This puts a strict limitation on future CTL capacity imposed by future coal production volumes, regardless of other factors such as economics, emissions or environmental concerns. Assuming that 10% of world coal production can be diverted to CTL, the contribution to liquid fuel supply will be limited to only a few mega barrels per day. This prevents CTL from becoming a viable mitigation plan for liquid fuel shortage on a global scale. However, it is still possible for individual nations to derive significant shares of their fuel supply from CTL, but those nations must also have access to equally significant coal production capacities. It is unrealistic to claim that CTL provides a feasible solution to liquid fuels shortages created by peak oil. For the most part, it can only be a minor contributor and must be combined with other strategies. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Eric D. Larson,et al.  Synthetic fuel production by indirect coal liquefaction , 2003 .

[2]  Tadeusz W Patzek,et al.  Potential for Coal-to-Liquids Conversion in the U.S.-Resource Base , 2009 .

[3]  Burtron H. Davis,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, catalysts and catalysis , 2007 .

[4]  Theoretical limits of engine economy with alternative automotive fuels , 1983 .

[5]  Thomas D. Durbin,et al.  Effects of Biodiesel, Biodiesel Blends, and a Synthetic Diesel on Emissions from Light Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles , 2000 .

[6]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Coal: Energy for the Future , 1995 .

[7]  Xiangkun Ren,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Costs of Alternative Coal Liquefaction Processes , 2005 .

[8]  Gerald Ondrey,et al.  Coal to liquids , 2005 .

[9]  Pierre Desprairies,et al.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[10]  A. Faaij,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis , 2009 .

[11]  N. Coville,et al.  Deactivation of a precipitated iron Fischer-Tropsch catalyst : A pilot plant study , 2006 .

[12]  Robert C. Milici.  Coal-to-Liquids: Potential Impact on U.S. Coal Reserves , 2009 .

[13]  Anthony V. Bridgwater,et al.  Production costs of liquid fuels by indirect coal liquefaction , 1994 .

[14]  Harry Perry,et al.  Liquid fuel supplies , 1980 .

[15]  Anne-Gaëlle Collot,et al.  Matching gasification technologies to coal properties , 2006 .

[16]  Kazuyuki Narusawa,et al.  Effects of diesel fuel composition on SOF and PAH exhaust emissions , 1997 .

[17]  R. E. Lumpkin,et al.  Recent Progress in the Direct Liquefaction of Coal , 1988, Science.

[18]  Andile B. Mzinyati.  Fuel-Blending Stocks from the Hydrotreatment of a Distillate Formed by Direct Coal Liquefaction , 2007 .

[19]  Hong Wang,et al.  Effect of magnesium promoter on iron-based catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2006 .

[20]  M. Dry,et al.  The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000 , 2002 .

[21]  Mikael Höök,et al.  Historical trends in American coal production and a possible future outlook , 2009 .

[22]  J. Laherrère,et al.  The End of Cheap Oil , 1998 .

[23]  A. G. Comolli,et al.  Direct liquefaction proof-of-concept program , 1997 .

[24]  P. L. Zuideveld,et al.  The Shell Middle Distillate Synthesis Process , 1991 .

[25]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[26]  S. T. Sie,et al.  The shell middle distillate synthesis process (SMDS) , 1988 .

[27]  M. Diack,et al.  Development and evaluation of iron based catalysts for the hydroliquefaction of coal , 1994 .

[28]  Roger Bentley,et al.  Global oil peaking: Responding to the case for ‘abundant supplies of oil’ , 2008 .

[29]  André L. Boehman,et al.  NOx emissions of alternative diesel fuels: A comparative analysis of biodiesel and FT diesel , 2005 .

[30]  Eric D. Larson,et al.  A comparison of direct and indirect liquefaction technologies for making fluid fuels from coal , 2003 .

[31]  A. Faaij,et al.  Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification , 2002 .

[32]  Xiongqi Pang,et al.  China's oil reserve forecast and analysis based on peak oil models , 2008 .

[33]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Peaking of world oil production: Impacts, mitigation, & risk management , 2005 .

[34]  Daniel Vallentin,et al.  Policy drivers and barriers for coal-to-liquids (CtL) technologies in the United States , 2008 .

[35]  Delanie Lamprecht,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch Fuel for Use by the U.S. Military as Battlefield-Use Fuel of the Future , 2007 .

[36]  M. Miller.  Agency , 2010 .

[37]  Michael A. Wilson,et al.  Hydrogenation of Liddell coal. Yields and mean chemical structures of the products , 1980 .

[38]  C. Campbell,et al.  The Peak and Decline of World Oil and Gas Production , 2003 .

[39]  Shan-You Wang,et al.  Effects of Fischer-Tropsch diesel fuel on combustion and emissions of direct injection diesel engine , 2008 .

[40]  D. Leckel,et al.  Diesel Production from Fischer−Tropsch: The Past, the Present, and New Concepts , 2009 .

[41]  M. Farcasiu.  Fractionation and structural characterization of coal liquids , 1977 .

[42]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production , 2009 .