Gene Expression Ratios Lead to Accurate and Translatable Predictors of DR5 Agonism across Multiple Tumor Lineages

Death Receptor 5 (DR5) agonists demonstrate anti-tumor activity in preclinical models but have yet to demonstrate robust clinical responses. A key limitation may be the lack of patient selection strategies to identify those most likely to respond to treatment. To overcome this limitation, we screened a DR5 agonist Nanobody across >600 cell lines representing 21 tumor lineages and assessed molecular features associated with response. High expression of DR5 and Casp8 were significantly associated with sensitivity, but their expression thresholds were difficult to translate due to low dynamic ranges. To address the translational challenge of establishing thresholds of gene expression, we developed a classifier based on ratios of genes that predicted response across lineages. The ratio classifier outperformed the DR5+Casp8 classifier, as well as standard approaches for feature selection and classification using genes, instead of ratios. This classifier was independently validated using 11 primary patient-derived pancreatic xenograft models showing perfect predictions as well as a striking linearity between prediction probability and anti-tumor response. A network analysis of the genes in the ratio classifier captured important biological relationships mediating drug response, specifically identifying key positive and negative regulators of DR5 mediated apoptosis, including DR5, CASP8, BID, cFLIP, XIAP and PEA15. Importantly, the ratio classifier shows translatability across gene expression platforms (from Affymetrix microarrays to RNA-seq) and across model systems (in vitro to in vivo). Our approach of using gene expression ratios presents a robust and novel method for constructing translatable biomarkers of compound response, which can also probe the underlying biology of treatment response.

[1]  W. Sellers,et al.  Multivalent nanobodies targeting death receptor 5 elicit superior tumor cell killing through efficient caspase induction , 2014, mAbs.

[2]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  An F876L mutation in androgen receptor confers genetic and phenotypic resistance to MDV3100 (enzalutamide). , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[3]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  22 The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia - Using Preclinical Models to Predict Anticancer Drug Sensitivity , 2012 .

[4]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[5]  J. Soria,et al.  Randomized phase II study of dulanermin in combination with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Maciejewski,et al.  An antiapoptotic BCL-2 family expression index predicts the response of chronic lymphocytic leukemia to ABT-737. , 2011, Blood.

[7]  A. Mazo,et al.  p16Ink4a overexpression in cancer: a tumor suppressor gene associated with senescence and high-grade tumors , 2011, Oncogene.

[8]  H. Walczak,et al.  Caspase-8 and bid: caught in the act between death receptors and mitochondria. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  G. Lomberk Epigenetic Silencing of Tumor Suppressor Genes in Pancreatic Cancer , 2011, Journal of gastrointestinal cancer.

[10]  A. Yang,et al.  Proapoptotic DR4 and DR5 signaling in cancer cells: toward clinical translation. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[11]  E. Brambilla,et al.  The ARF tumor suppressor: Structure, functions and status in cancer , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[12]  R. Herbst,et al.  A First-in-Human Study of Conatumumab in Adult Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  A. Ashkenazi,et al.  New insights into apoptosis signaling by Apo2L/TRAIL , 2010, Oncogene.

[14]  Kevin C. Dorff,et al.  The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  A. Hori,et al.  Biomarkers for predicting the sensitivity of cancer cells to TRAIL-R1 agonistic monoclonal antibody. , 2010, Cancer letters.

[16]  R. Herbst,et al.  Phase I dose-escalation study of recombinant human Apo2L/TRAIL, a dual proapoptotic receptor agonist, in patients with advanced cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  C. Korch,et al.  Development of an Integrated Genomic Classifier for a Novel Agent in Colorectal Cancer: Approach to Individualized Therapy in Early Development , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  P. Hersey,et al.  TRAIL-induced apoptosis of human melanoma cells involves activation of caspase-4 , 2010, Apoptosis.

[19]  J. Wiezorek,et al.  Death Receptor Agonists as a Targeted Therapy for Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  Ramil N. Nurtdinov,et al.  PLANdbAffy: probe-level annotation database for Affymetrix expression microarrays , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  H. Revets,et al.  The development of nanobodies for therapeutic applications. , 2009, Current opinion in investigational drugs.

[22]  J. Lehár,et al.  Synergistic drug combinations improve therapeutic selectivity , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  J. Olson,et al.  DR5-mediated DISC controls caspase-8 cleavage and initiation of apoptosis in human glioblastomas , 2009, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[24]  Simak Ali,et al.  Regulation of ERBB2 by oestrogen receptor–PAX2 determines response to tamoxifen , 2008, Nature.

[25]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of the interaction between the agonistic monoclonal antibody Apomab and the proapoptotic receptor DR5 , 2008, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[26]  G. Cohen,et al.  TRAIL signals to apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells primarily through TRAIL‐R1 whereas cross‐linked agonistic TRAIL‐R2 antibodies facilitate signalling via TRAIL‐R2 , 2007, British journal of haematology.

[27]  G. Cohen,et al.  TRAIL signals to apoptosis in CLL cells primarily through TRAIL R-1 whereas cross-linked agonistic TRAIL R-2 antibodies facilitate signalling via TRAIL R-2 , 2007 .

[28]  G. Cavet,et al.  Death-receptor O-glycosylation controls tumor-cell sensitivity to the proapoptotic ligand Apo2L/TRAIL , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[29]  H. Ford,et al.  Six1 overexpression in ovarian carcinoma causes resistance to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis and is associated with poor survival. , 2007, Cancer research.

[30]  L. Hood,et al.  Highly accurate two-gene classifier for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyosarcomas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[32]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  W. Grizzle,et al.  Cleavage of p53-vimentin complex enhances tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated apoptosis of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. , 2005, The American journal of pathology.

[34]  C. Ware,et al.  Enhanced Apoptosis and Tumor Regression Induced by a Direct Agonist Antibody to Tumor Necrosis Factor–Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Receptor 2 , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[35]  F. Martinon,et al.  Inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes: master switches of inflammation , 2007, Cell Death and Differentiation.