HAVE WE REACHED PEAK CCS? By

AN INCREASE in commercial cane sugar (CCS) is up to 1.8 times more valuable than a sucrose yield increase due to improved cane yield, because increased CCS does not attract high marginal costs in harvesting, transport and milling as does increased cane yield. Despite the priority in research and development investment to increasing CCS in past decades, industry mean CCS has fluctuated between 13 and 14% over the past 15 years with no obvious trend upward or downward. In this paper we consider limits to CCS and sucrose content in sugarcane and what may be done to address these limits. The maximum CCS in commercial cane delivered to mills in Australia appears to be about 18% and, while levels of sucrose in internode tissue measured in carefully controlled glasshouse conditions is only 3% units higher, we suggest that future efforts concentrate on the gap of 4 to 5% units between the highest observed CCS levels and the industrial average. This gap arises because of genetic responses to environmental factors and age, in contrast to a bio-physical limit to sucrose content already reached, and because of extraneous matter with little or no CCS. There is an opportunity to manage crops and select varieties that have higher CCS earlier in the season, and with better response to environmental factors reducing CCS. There is some evidence suggesting high CCS genotypes may be sensitive to factors affecting stem elongation. Moderate reductions in expansive growth will reduce cane volume and weight without sacrificing photosynthesis, leading to improved CCS. Ripeners could be re-evaluated with a better understanding of ripener, water, temperature and genotype interactions possibly using controlled conditions of the glasshouse. Reasons for the apparent limited progress in breeding programs in leading to increased industry CCS are not clear, but some suggestions are made for a re-evaluation of past approaches.

[1]  Robert G. Birch,et al.  Physiological basis for enhanced sucrose accumulation in an engineered sugarcane cell line , 2010 .

[2]  D. M. Hogarth,et al.  What happens from field to mill? Crop-fraction and CCS considerations. , 2002 .

[3]  J. K. Stringer,et al.  Benchmarking genetic gains from new cultivars in Queensland using productivity data. , 2007 .

[4]  Nils Berding,et al.  Evaluation of commercial performance and attributes of Q200 in North Queensland. , 2010 .

[5]  H. Rostron,et al.  CHEMICAL RIPENING OF SUGARCANE WITH FUSILADE SUPER , 1985 .

[6]  M. L. Hewitt,et al.  Source–sink differences in genotypes and water regimes influencing sucrose accumulation in sugarcane stalks , 2009 .

[7]  D. M. Hogarth,et al.  The relative importance of cane yield and traits affecting CCS in sugarcane varieties. , 2000 .

[8]  D. M. Hogarth,et al.  OPPORTUNITIES TO INCREASE RATES OF PARENT IMPROVEMENT IN AUSTRALIAN SUGARCANE BREEDING PROGRAMS , 2004 .

[9]  F. Botha,et al.  Down-regulation of pyrophosphate: fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP) activity in sugarcane enhances sucrose accumulation in immature internodes , 2008, Transgenic Research.

[10]  D. M. Hogarth,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TIME OF RATOONING ON SUGARCANE GROWTH IN THE BURDEKIN , 2006 .

[11]  R. A. Lawes,et al.  Applications of industry information in sugarcane production systems , 2005 .

[12]  Johann M Rohwer,et al.  Kinetic model of sucrose accumulation in maturing sugarcane culm tissue. , 2007, Phytochemistry.

[13]  L. Leloir,et al.  The biosynthesis of sucrose. , 1955, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  Sarah E. Lingle,et al.  Sugar Metabolism during Growth and Development in Sugarcane Internodes , 1999 .

[15]  W. L. Burnquist,et al.  EVALUATING SUGARCANE R&D PERFORMANCE: EVALUATION OF THREE BREEDING PROGRAMS , 2010 .

[16]  D. Hogarth,et al.  Recognising the impact of climate on CCS of sugarcane across tropical and sub-tropical regions of the Australian sugar industry. , 2002 .

[17]  R. A. Donaldson EFFECTS OF VARIOUS RATES OF FUSILADE SUPER AS A RIPENER ON THE SUGARCANE VARIETY N14 , 1989 .

[18]  Graham D. Bonnett,et al.  Sucrose‐Phosphate Synthase, a Biochemical Marker of High Sucrose Accumulation in Sugarcane , 2007 .

[19]  P. Jackson,et al.  Quantitative trait loci identified for sugar related traits in a sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar × Saccharum officinarum population , 2006, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  Phillip Jackson,et al.  Early stage selection for commercial cane sugar (CCS) in sugarcane clones: effects of time of sampling and irrigation , 2003 .

[21]  N. G. Inman-Bamber,et al.  Increasing sucrose accumulation in sugarcane by manipulating leaf extension and photosynthesis with irrigation , 2008 .

[22]  N. Inman-Bamber,et al.  Sugarcane water stress criteria for irrigation and drying off. , 2004 .

[23]  E. Komor,et al.  Sucrose Accumulation in the Sugarcane Stem Is Regulated by the Difference between the Activities of Soluble Acid Invertase and Sucrose Phosphate Synthase , 1997, Plant physiology.

[24]  S. Chapman,et al.  Lodging reduces sucrose accumulation of sugarcane in the wet and dry tropics , 2002 .

[25]  D. Glassop,et al.  Sucrose accumulation in sugarcane is influenced by temperature and genotype through the carbon source–sink balance , 2010 .

[26]  Phillip Jackson,et al.  Chemical ripeners increase early season sugar content in a range of sugarcane varieties , 2007 .

[27]  Rosanne E. Casu,et al.  Identification of a novel sugar transporter homologue strongly expressed in maturing stem vascular tissues of sugarcane by expressed sequence tag and microarray analysis , 2003, Plant Molecular Biology.

[28]  Luguang Wu,et al.  Doubled sugar content in sugarcane plants modified to produce a sucrose isomer. , 2007, Plant biotechnology journal.