Local Correlation-based Fingerprint Matching

Most fingerprint matching systems are based on matching minutia points between two fingerprint images. Each minutia is represented by a fixed number of attributes such as the location, orientation, type and other local information. A hard decision is made on the match between a pair of minutiae based on the similarity of these attributes. In this paper, we present a minutiae matching algorithm that uses spatial correlation of regions around the minutiae to ascertain the quality of each minutia match. The proposed algorithm has two main advantages. Since the gray level values of the pixels around a minutia point retain most of the local information, spatial correlation provides an accurate measure of the similarity between minutia regions. Secondly, no hard decision is made on the correspondence between a minutia pair. Instead the quality of all the minutiae matches are accumulated to arrive at the final matching score between the template and query fingerprint impressions. Experiments on a database of 160 users (4 impressions per finger) indicate that the proposed algorithm serves well to complement the 2D dynamic programming based minutiae matching technique; a combination of these two methods can reduce the false non-match rate by approximately 3.5% at a false match rate of 0.1%.

[1]  Sarat C. Dass Markov random field models for directional field and singularity extraction in fingerprint images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  On the Individuality of Fingerprints , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Memory efficient fingerprint verification , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  FVC2004: Third Fingerprint Verification Competition , 2004, ICBA.

[5]  Alan Mink,et al.  Multimodal biometrics: issues in design and testing , 2003, ICMI '03.

[6]  Arun Ross,et al.  Information fusion in biometrics , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Real-Time Matching System for Large Fingerprint Databases , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  On-line fingerprint verification , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition , 2005, Springer Professional Computing.

[10]  S. H. Gerez,et al.  A correlation-based fingerprint verification system , 2000 .

[11]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  Filterbank-based fingerprint matching , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  A. J. Willis,et al.  A cost-effective fingerprint recognition system for use with low-quality prints and damaged fingertips , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  On the individuality fingerprints , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[14]  Arun Ross,et al.  Information fusion in biometrics , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Combining multiple matchers for a high security fingerprint verification system , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[17]  Zsolt Miklós Kovács-Vajna,et al.  A Fingerprint Verification System Based on Triangular Matching and Dynamic Time Warping , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Arun Ross,et al.  A hybrid "ngerprint matcher , 2003 .

[19]  Arun Ross,et al.  A hybrid fingerprint matcher , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Automatic personal identification using fingerprints , 1998 .