An experimental test for synergistic epistasis and its application in Chlamydomonas.

Theoretically, one of the most general benefits of sex is given by its function in facilitating selection against deleterious mutations. This advantage of sex may be deterministic if deleterious mutations affect the fitness of an individual in a synergistic way, i.e., if mutations increase each others' negative fitness effect. We present a new test for synergistic epistasis that considers the skewness of the log fitness distribution of offspring from a cross. We applied this test to data of the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas moewussii. For this purpose, two crosses were made: one between two strains that are presumed to have accumulated slightly deleterious mutations, the other between two strains without a history of mutation accumulation. Fitness was measured by estimating the two parameters of logistic growth in batch culture, the maximum growth rate (r) and the carrying capacity (K). The finding of a negatively skewed distribution for K in the accumulation cross suggests synergism between mutations affecting the carrying capacity, while the absence of skewness for tau in both crosses is consistent with independent effects of mutations affecting this parameter. The results suggest a possible alternative explanation for the general observation that sex is related to constant environments, where selection on K predominates, while asexual reproduction is found in more variable environments, where selection on r is more important.

[1]  J. D. de Visser,et al.  The effect of sex and deleterious mutations on fitness in Chlamydomonas , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  G. Bell The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. I. Genotype-by-environment interaction among pure strains , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. Kondrashov Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. , 1982, Genetical research.

[4]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[5]  N. Leyland GROWTH AND COMPETITION , 1964 .

[6]  M. Kimura,et al.  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. , 1966, Genetics.

[7]  H. Muller THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. , 1964, Mutation research.

[8]  E. Szathmáry,et al.  Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer. , 1993, Genetics.

[9]  G. Bell The Masterpiece of Nature , 2019 .

[10]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Competition for Nutrients and Light in a Mixed Water Column: A Theoretical Analysis , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[11]  U. Schlösser SAG ‐ Sammlung von Algenkulturen at the University of Göttingen Catalogue of Strains 1994 , 1994 .

[12]  J. Haigh The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Light-limited growth and competition for light in well-mixed aquatic environments : An elementary model , 1994 .

[14]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. M. Smith What use is sex? , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Unravelling the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex : a Commentary on ' Mutation–selection Balance and the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex and Recombination ' , 2022 .

[17]  A. Kondrashov Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[18]  James F. Crow,et al.  Genetic Loads and the Cost of Natural Selection , 1970 .