The influence of perceived uncertainty on entrepreneurial action in the transition to a low-emission energy infrastructure: The case of biomass combustion in The Netherlands

Abstract The transition towards renewable energy production will not occur without the involvement of entrepreneurs who dare to take action amidst uncertainty. In an earlier article, a conceptual model was introduced for analyzing how perceived uncertainties influence the decisions and actions of entrepreneurs involved in innovation projects that aimed at developing and implementing renewable energy technologies. In this article, the conceptual model is applied to stand-alone biomass combustion projects in the Netherlands. Although none of the biomass combustion projects has been abandoned, some entrepreneurs clearly have more difficulty to turn their project into a success than others. To create insight into the underlying dynamics of these projects, the article analyzes what types of positive or negative interaction patterns occur over time between (internal or external) factors in the project environment, perceived uncertainties, motivation and entrepreneurial action and how these patterns can be stimulated or prevented. The results provide several lessons to take into account when designing policies for stimulating the development and implementation of biomass combustion.

[1]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Perceived uncertainties regarding socio-technological transformations: towards a framework , 2006 .

[2]  André Faaij,et al.  IEA Bioenergy Task 40 country report for the Netherlands 2011 , 2007 .

[3]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[4]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[5]  H. V. D. Ven.  The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship , 1993 .

[6]  Wright,et al.  The Mosaic Of Economic Growth , 1996 .

[7]  M. Hekkert,et al.  How perceived uncertainties influence transitions; the case of micro-CHP in the Netherlands. , 2007 .

[8]  Jeffery S. McMullen,et al.  Entrepreneurial Action And The Role Of Uncertainty In The Theory Of The Entrepreneur , 2006 .

[9]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[10]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion : A functional analysis , 2007 .

[11]  F. Geels,et al.  Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways , 2010 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[13]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Uncertainty and technological change , 1996 .

[14]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[15]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Responding to Structural Industry Changes: A Technological Evolution Perspective , 1997 .

[16]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in the Transition Towards Sustainability: Cases of Emerging Energy Technologies in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[17]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[18]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The influence of perceived uncertainty on entrepreneurial action in emerging renewable energy technology; biomass gasification projects in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[19]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[20]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[21]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[22]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[23]  Frances J. Milliken.  Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[24]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[25]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity , 2001 .

[26]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Stimulating renewable energy technologies by innovation policy , 2008 .

[27]  R. Smits,et al.  The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy , 2004 .

[28]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[29]  W. Gartner.  What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship , 1990 .

[30]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[31]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).

[32]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Initial infrastructure development strategies for the transition to sustainable mobility , 2010 .

[33]  I.S.M. Meijer,et al.  Uncertainty and entrepreneurial action. The role of uncertainty in the development of emerging energy technologies , 2008 .

[34]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .