Frame-shifting and Sentential Integration

We consider di erent ways in which understanding a single word can a ect the overall construal of the discourse event. One such process is frame-shifting, semantic reanalysis in which elements of the existing message-level representation are mapped into a new frame. This view predicts that scenarios which occasion frame-shifting present a challenge to the processor di erent from that presented by lexical violations consistent with the currently active frame. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated the relationship between sentence nal words and their preceding contexts, and compared reading times for words which triggered frame-shifting, with those for equally unexpected but frame-consistent words. In both humorous and nonhumorous sentences, participants spent longer reading words which triggered frame-shifting than frame-consistent controls. The pattern of results suggests that the message-level representation involves hierarchically organized attribute-value structures, and includes causal and relational information. Traditional frame-based comprehension systems, however, cannot fully account for the dynamically adaptive nature of frame-shifting. An alternative is mentioned in brief.

[1]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models , 1986 .

[2]  M. Minsky Jokes and the Logic of the Cognitive Unconscious , 1980 .

[3]  A. Graesser,et al.  Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. , 1980 .

[4]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration and Formal Expression , 1995 .

[5]  Mark Turner,et al.  Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science , 1997 .

[6]  Mark F. St. John,et al.  The Story Gestalt: A Model of Knowledge-Intensive Processes in Text Comprehension , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Memory-based language processing: psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  E. Shoben,et al.  The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. , 1985 .

[9]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  Neural Representation of Conceptual Knowledge. , 1986 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Explorations in parallel distributed processing: a handbook of models, programs, and exercises , 1988 .

[11]  Charles Travis,et al.  The True and the False: The Domain of the Pragmatic , 1981 .

[12]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Refer-ential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[13]  J. Bransford,et al.  Comprehension and semantic flexibility , 1974 .

[14]  Michael G. Dyer,et al.  High-level Inferencing in a Connectionist Network , 1989 .

[15]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[16]  Miriam R. L. Petruck FRAME SEMANTICS , 1996 .

[17]  G. Fauconnier Mappings in thought and language , 1997 .

[18]  S. Attardo,et al.  The linear organization of jokes: analysis of two thousand texts , 1994 .

[19]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .

[20]  P. Johnson-Laird The mental representation of the meaning of words , 1987, Cognition.

[21]  Kathy Kellermann,et al.  The conversation mop: Scenes in the stream of discourse , 1989 .

[22]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Issues of Representation in Psycholinguistics , 1995 .

[23]  A Dynamic Account of Grammatical Function , 1997 .

[24]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Reminding and Memory Organization: An Introduction to MOPs. , 1979 .

[25]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Making sense of nonce sense , 1983 .

[27]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Linguistic Context and the Priming of Semantic Information Linguistic Context and the Priming of Semantic Information , 2022 .

[28]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Word Recognition in a Functional Context: The Use of Scripts in Reading. , 1985 .

[32]  L. Shastri,et al.  From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  R. Wilensky Points: a theory of the structure of stories in memory , 1986 .

[34]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Natural-Language Processing , 1982, Artificial Intelligence.

[35]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  L. Barsalou Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields , 1992 .