The Stanford Acuity Test: A Precise Vision Test Using Bayesian Techniques and a Discovery in Human Visual Response

Chart-based visual acuity measurements are used by billions of people to diagnose and guide treatment of vision impairment. However, the ubiquitous eye exam has no mechanism for reasoning about uncertainty and as such, suffers from a well-documented reproducibility problem. In this paper we make two core contributions. First, we uncover a new parametric probabilistic model of visual acuity response based on detailed measurements of patients with eye disease. Then, we present an adaptive, digital eye exam using modern artificial intelligence techniques which substantially reduces acuity exam error over existing approaches, while also introducing the novel ability to model its own uncertainty and incorporate prior beliefs. Using standard evaluation metrics, we estimate a 74% reduction in prediction error compared to the ubiquitous chart-based eye exam and up to 67% reduction compared to the previous best digital exam. For patients with eye disease, the novel ability to finely measure acuity from home could be a crucial part in early diagnosis. We provide a web implementation of our algorithm for anyone in the world to use. The insights in this paper also provide interesting implications for the field of psychometric Item Response Theory.

[1]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Reinforcement Learning by Probability Matching , 1995, NIPS 1995.

[2]  G. Westheimer Scaling of visual acuity measurements. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-Variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  Gretchen A. Stevens,et al.  Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990-2010. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[5]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Likelihood-Weighting Simulation on a Large, Multiply-Connected Belief Network , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[7]  L. Joskowicz,et al.  Comparison of Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts using a computer simulation. , 2016, International journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Monika A. Formankiewicz,et al.  Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols , 2016, Vision Research.

[9]  Ulrik R. Beierholm,et al.  Probability Matching as a Computational Strategy Used in Perception , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Michael Bach,et al.  Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Jing Cao,et al.  Bayesian IRT Guessing Models for Partial Guessing Behaviors , 2008 .

[12]  Melvin R. Novick,et al.  Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability , 1966 .

[13]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  I. Murdoch,et al.  The development of a “reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.