Seeking water while avoiding predators: moisture gradients can affect predator–prey interactions

Water is an essential resource that can affect the distribution and abundance of species across ecosystems. However, how water availability and its spatial heterogeneity affect animal movement, and associated predator–prey encounter and predation rates, is still poorly understood. Using predatory centipedes and springtails (prey) from the leaf litter of a beech forest, we conducted two laboratory experiments in which we manipulated water availability to test (1) whether centipedes and springtails decrease their mobility when moisture is limiting, (2) whether centipedes and springtails aggregate in patches were moisture is high, and, if so, (3) whether springtails tend to avoid these otherwise suitable areas when predators are present. Overall, average water availability did not affect levels of mobility, and both animal taxa were equally attracted to the moistest spots. Springtails, however, switched to slightly drier spots when predators were present, and as expected from physiological constraints in water loss, smaller springtails spent more time in wet spots, incurring higher predation risk. Larger animals were more active regardless of taxonomic affiliation, although springtails switched to a much higher mobility under predation risk. This size-dependent antipredator behaviour could explain why predation rates were similar across treatments. Since spatial heterogeneity in moisture is widespread in terrestrial ecosystems, our findings may be relevant to understanding predator–prey dynamics, not only in arid environments, but also in temperate ecosystems, such as beech forests.

[1]  A. Sih,et al.  A Review of the Drift and Activity Responses of Stream Prey to Predator Presence , 1995 .

[2]  H. Schume,et al.  Factors controlling soil water-recharge in a mixed European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)–Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] stand , 2004, European Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades : Effects of predation risk on food web interactions , 1997 .

[4]  G. Tian,et al.  Abundance of springtails (Collembola) under four agroforestry tree species with contrasting litter quality , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[5]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  Towards a general formalization of encounter rates in ecology , 2013, Theoretical Ecology.

[6]  D. Joly,et al.  Dynamics of springtail and mite populations: the role of density dependence, predation, and weather , 2002 .

[7]  K. Katzensteiner,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of the soil water content in a mixed Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.)–European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand , 2003 .

[8]  D. Windsor,et al.  Litter moisture content as a determinant of litter arthropod distribution and abundance during the dry season on Barro Colorado Island, Panama , 1984 .

[9]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[10]  M. Elgar,et al.  Water as an Essential Resource: Orb Web Spiders Cannot Balance Their Water Budget by Prey Alone , 2012 .

[11]  I. Noy‐Meir Desert Ecosystems: Higher Trophic Levels , 1974 .

[12]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Shifting species interactions in terrestrial dryland ecosystems under altered water availability and climate change , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[14]  F. Valladares,et al.  Temporal dynamics of herbivory and water availability interactively modulate the outcome of a grass–shrub interaction in a semi‐arid ecosystem , 2011 .

[15]  J. Moya‐Laraño Can temperature and water availability contribute to the maintenance of latitudinal diversity by increasing the rate of biotic interactions , 2010 .

[16]  S. Chown Discontinuous gas exchange: new perspectives on evolutionary origins and ecological implications , 2011 .

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[18]  Kung-Sik Chan,et al.  Ecological Effects of Climate Fluctuations , 2002, Science.

[19]  O. Schmitz,et al.  EFFECTS OF GROUPING BEHAVIOR AND PREDATORS ON THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF A FOREST FLOOR ARTHROPOD , 2005 .

[20]  D. Wise,et al.  The impact of altered precipitation on spatial stratification and activity‐densities of springtails (Collembola) and spiders (Araneae) , 2005 .

[21]  R. Scholes,et al.  Tree-grass interactions in Savannas , 1997 .

[22]  E. Werner,et al.  Ecological Consequences of the Trade-Off between Growth and Mortality Rates Mediated by Foraging Activity , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[23]  T. Dawson Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: implications for water balance, performance and plant-plant interactions , 1993, Oecologia.

[24]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Soil as a mediator in plant-plant interactions in a semi-arid community , 2004 .

[25]  U. Brose,et al.  Habitat structure and prey aggregation determine the functional response in a soil predator–prey interaction , 2010 .

[26]  M. Arnedo,et al.  Potential drivers of spatial structure of leaf-litter food webs in south-western European beech forests , 2012 .

[27]  Amos Bouskila,et al.  Efficiency Evaluation of Two Competing Foraging Modes under Different Conditions , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[28]  D. Coleman,et al.  Fundamentals of Soil Ecology , 1996 .

[29]  R. May,et al.  Aggregation of Predators and Insect Parasites and its Effect on Stability , 1974 .

[30]  D. Wise,et al.  Effects of altered precipitation and wolf spiders on the density and activity of forest-floor Collembola , 2006 .

[31]  D. Wise,et al.  Predicted climate change alters the indirect effect of predators on an ecosystem process , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  S. Chown Desiccation resistance in six sub-Antarctic weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): humidity as an abiotic factor influencing assemblage structure , 1993 .

[33]  G. Meehl,et al.  Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. , 2000, Science.

[34]  R. Brumme,et al.  Functioning and management of European beech ecosystems , 2009 .

[35]  Bernd Diekkrüger,et al.  Modelling the spatial variability of soil moisture in a micro-scale catchment and comparison with field data using geostatistics , 2003 .

[36]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[37]  J. Sabo,et al.  Water availability directly determines per capita consumption at two trophic levels. , 2009, Ecology.

[38]  Joan Saldaña,et al.  Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs , 1993 .

[39]  F. Maestre,et al.  Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  J. Anderson,et al.  Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1979 .

[41]  M. Uriarte,et al.  Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. , 2006, Ecology.

[43]  M. Hassall,et al.  Vertical migration of Onychiurus subtenuis (Collembola) in relation to rainfall and microbial activity , 1986, Pedobiologia.

[44]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food webs , 2013 .

[45]  E. Berlow,et al.  Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[46]  A. Weigelt,et al.  Influence of water availability on competitive interactions between plant species on sandy soils , 2000, Folia Geobotanica.

[47]  B. O. Wolf,et al.  Thermal Effects of Radiation and Wind on a Small Bird and Implications for Microsite Selection , 1996 .

[48]  T. Schoener,et al.  Climatic control of trophic interaction strength: the effect of lizards on spiders , 2007, Oecologia.

[49]  A. Niemiera Norway Spruce, Picea abies , 2012 .

[50]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[51]  D. Renault,et al.  Water loss of male and female Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) maintained under dry conditions , 2004 .

[52]  M Gyllenberg,et al.  Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.