ICESat-2 Marine Bathymetry: Extraction, Refraction Adjustment and Vertical Accuracy as a Function of Depth in Mid-Latitude Temperate Contexts

Nearshore bathymetric data are used in many coastal monitoring applications, but acquisition conditions can be challenging. Shipborne surveys are prone to the risk of grounding in shallow waters, and scheduled airborne surveys often fail to coincide with optimal atmospheric and water conditions. As an alternative, since its launch in 2018, ICESat-2 satellite laser profile altimetry data provide free and readily available data on a 91-day repeat cycle, which may contain incidental bathymetric returns when suitable environmental conditions prevail. In this paper, the vertical accuracy of extracted, refraction-adjusted ICESat-2 nearshore marine bathymetric data is evaluated at four test sites in a Northern hemisphere, temperate latitude location. Multiple ICEsat-2 bathymetric values that occurred in close horizontal proximity to one another were averaged at a spatial scale of 1 m and compared with Multibeam Echosounder bathymetric survey data and Global Navigation Satellite System reference data. Mean absolute errors of less than 0.15 m were observed up to depths of 5 m, with errors of less than 0.24 m (to 6 m), 0.39 m (to 7 m) and 0.52 m (to 10 m). The occurrence of larger bathymetric errors with depth, which increase to 0.54 m at maximum photon depths of 11 m, appears to be primarily related to reduced numbers of geolocated photons with depth. The accuracies achieved up to 6 m suggest that the manual extraction, refraction adjustment and bathymetric filtering steps were effective. Overall, the results suggest that ICESat-2 bathymetric data accuracy may be sufficient to be considered for use in nearshore coastal monitoring applications where shipborne and airborne bathymetric data might otherwise be applied.

[1]  Shachak Pe'eri,et al.  The impact of sea state condition on airborne lidar bathymetry measurements , 2012, Other Conferences.

[2]  Kutalmis Saylam,et al.  Assessment of depth and turbidity with airborne Lidar bathymetry and multiband satellite imagery in shallow water bodies of the Alaskan North Slope , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[3]  Dierk Hebbeln,et al.  Precision of high-resolution multibeam echo sounding coupled with high-accuracy positioning in a shallow water coastal environment , 2006 .

[4]  Bisheng Yang,et al.  Satellite-derived bathymetry using the ICESat-2 lidar and Sentinel-2 imagery datasets , 2020 .

[5]  Wojciech M. Klonowski,et al.  Intercomparison of shallow water bathymetry, hydro‐optics, and benthos mapping techniques in Australian and Caribbean coastal environments , 2011 .

[6]  Scott F. Heron,et al.  Remote Sensing of Coral Reefs for Monitoring and Management: A Review , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[7]  P. Harris,et al.  Satellite-derived bathymetry in optically complex waters using a model inversion approach and Sentinel-2 data , 2020 .

[8]  S. Phinn,et al.  Filling the ‘white ribbon’ – a multisource seamless digital elevation model for Lizard Island, northern Great Barrier Reef , 2013 .

[9]  David J. Harding,et al.  The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation , 2017 .

[10]  Sarah M. Hamylton,et al.  Derivation of High-Resolution Bathymetry from Multispectral Satellite Imagery: A Comparison of Empirical and Optimisation Methods through Geographical Error Analysis , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Amy L. Neuenschwander,et al.  Photon counting LiDAR: An adaptive ground and canopy height retrieval algorithm for ICESat-2 data , 2018 .

[12]  J. Hedley,et al.  Seagrass Depth Distribution Mirrors Coastal Development in the Mexican Caribbean – An Automated Analysis of 800 Satellite Images , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[13]  R. Stumpf,et al.  Determination of water depth with high‐resolution satellite imagery over variable bottom types , 2003 .

[14]  C. Cahalane,et al.  A comparison of Landsat 8, RapidEye and Pleiades products for improving empirical predictions of satellite-derived bathymetry , 2019, Remote sensing of environment.

[15]  A. Kotilainen,et al.  Comparison of airborne LiDAR and shipboard acoustic data in complex shallow water environments: Filling in the white ribbon zone , 2017 .

[16]  Thorsten Markus,et al.  The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite - 2 Mission: A Global Geolocated Photon Product Derived From the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System. , 2019, Remote sensing of environment.

[17]  Lori A. Magruder,et al.  Validation of ICESat-2 ATLAS Bathymetry and Analysis of ATLAS's Bathymetric Mapping Performance , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Jianhu Zhao,et al.  Improved Model for Depth Bias Correction in Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry Systems , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[19]  H. Maas,et al.  Refined Geometric Modeling of Laser Pulse Propagation in Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry , 2021, PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science.

[20]  Paul Harris,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Coastal Bathymetry Based on Multispectral Satellite Imagery and Multibeam Data , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Jared L. Peters,et al.  Geological seabed stability model for informing Irish offshore renewable energy opportunities , 2020 .