ICONE: An International Consortium of Neuro Endovascular Centres

The proliferation of new endovascular devices and therapeutic strategies calls for a prudent and rational evaluation of their clinical benefit. This evaluation must be done in an effective manner and in collaboration with industry. Such research initiative requires organisational and methodological support to survive and thrive in a competitive environment. We propose the formation of an international consortium, an academic alliance committed to the pursuit of effective neurovascular therapies. Such a consortium would be dedicated to the design and execution of basic science, device development and clinical trials. The Consortium is owned and operated by its members. Members are international leaders in neurointerventional research and clinical practice. The Consortium brings competency, knowledge, and expertise to industry as well as to its membership across a spectrum of research initiatives such as: expedited review of clinical trials, protocol development, surveys and systematic reviews; laboratory expertise and support for research design and grant applications to public agencies. Once objectives and protocols are approved, the Consortium provides a stable network of centers capable of timely realization of clinical trials or preclinical investigations in an optimal environment. The Consortium is a non-profit organization. The potential revenue generated from client-sponsored financial agreements will be re-directed to the academic and research objectives of the organization. The Consortium wishes to work in concert with industry, to support emerging trends in neurovascular therapeutic development. The Consortium is a realistic endeavour optimally structured to promote excellence through scientific appraisal of our treatments, and to accelerate technical progress while maximizing patients' safety and welfare.

[1]  Sergio Sismondo,et al.  Ghost Management: How Much of the Medical Literature Is Shaped Behind the Scenes by the Pharmaceutical Industry? , 2007, PLoS Medicine.

[2]  T. Kwon,et al.  Covered Stent Application of a Repeatedly Regrowing Iatrogenic Subclavian Artery Pseudoaneurysm at the Origin of the Vertebral Artery , 2007, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[3]  Ready or not, here they come: randomized trials evaluating new endovascular aneurysm therapies. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  Peter Conrad,et al.  The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders , 2007 .

[5]  A. Fox,et al.  Trial on endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms (TEAM): study monitoring and rationale for trial interruption or continuation. , 2007, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[6]  J. Raymond,et al.  Interventional neuroradiology: the role of experimental models in scientific progress. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  Brandon Keim Tied up in red tape, European trials shut down , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[8]  A. Fox,et al.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the unreliability of clinical judgment, the necessity for evidence, and reasons to participate in a randomized trial. , 2006, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[9]  Have you been smoking something that is biologically active? , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  J. Collet,et al.  Safety, science, and sales: a request for valid clinical trials to assess new devices for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  A. Weill,et al.  New Devices Designed to Improve the Long-Term Results of Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms , 2004, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[12]  A. Weill,et al.  A Randomized Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms is Feasible , 2004, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[13]  T. Cleophas,et al.  Clinical trials in jeopardy. , 2003, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[14]  A. Molyneux International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[15]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. , 1998, Journal of insurance medicine.

[17]  Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Jean-René Ladmiral,et al.  La technique et la science comme "idéologie" , 1973 .