Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) comprise the largest family of membrane proteins and are of considerable interest as targets for drug development. However, many GPCR structures remain unsolved. To address the structural ambiguity of these receptors, computational tools such as homology modeling and loop modeling are often employed to generate predictive receptor structures. Here we combined both methods to benchmark a protocol incorporating homology modeling based on a locally selected template and extracellular loop modeling that additionally evaluates the presence of template ligands during these modeling steps. Ligands were also docked using three docking methods and two pose selection methods to elucidate an optimal ligand pose selection method. Results suggest that local template-based homology models followed by loop modeling produce more accurate and predictive receptor models than models produced without loop modeling, with decreases in average receptor and ligand RMSD of 0.54 Å and 2.91 Å, respectively. Ligand docking results showcased the ability of MOE induced fit docking to produce ligand poses with atom root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values at least 0.20 Å lower (on average) than the other two methods benchmarked in this study. In addition, pose selection methods (software-based scoring, ligand complementation) selected lower RMSD poses with MOE induced fit docking than either of the other methods (averaging at least 1.57 Å lower), indicating that MOE induced fit docking is most suited for docking into GPCR homology models in our hands. In addition, target receptor models produced with a template ligand present throughout the modeling process most often produced target ligand poses with RMSD values ≤ 4.5 Å and Tanimoto coefficients > 0.6 after selection based on ligand complementation than target receptor models produced in the absence of template ligands. Overall, the findings produced by this study support the use of local template homology modeling in combination with de novo ECL2 modeling in the presence of a ligand from the template crystal structure to generate GPCR models intended to study ligand binding interactions.

[1]  Amelie Stein,et al.  Improvements to Robotics-Inspired Conformational Sampling in Rosetta , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  A. Buschauer,et al.  The Extracellular Loop 2 (ECL2) of the Human Histamine H4 Receptor Substantially Contributes to Ligand Binding and Constitutive Activity , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[4]  David Baker,et al.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Structures of the CXCR4 Chemokine GPCR with Small-Molecule and Cyclic Peptide Antagonists , 2010, Science.

[6]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Structure of the human histamine H1 receptor complex with doxepin , 2011, Nature.

[7]  M. Rudd,et al.  Structural Basis for Selectivity and Diversity in Angiotensin II Receptors , 2017, Nature.

[8]  H. Schiöth,et al.  The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. , 2003, Molecular pharmacology.

[9]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Crystal structures of the M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors , 2016, Nature.

[10]  R. Abagyan,et al.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: Orphan receptor ligand discovery by pickpocketing pharmacological neighbors , 2016, Nature Chemical Biology.

[11]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  The Dynamic Process of β2-Adrenergic Receptor Activation , 2013, Cell.

[12]  Jens Meiler,et al.  Rosetta Ligand docking with flexible XML protocols. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[13]  Judith A Cole,et al.  A benchmark study of loop modeling methods applied to G protein-coupled receptors , 2019, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[14]  D. Veprintsev,et al.  Stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors by point mutations , 2015, Front. Pharmacol..

[15]  Z. Xiang,et al.  Advances in homology protein structure modeling. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.

[16]  D. Baker,et al.  G protein-coupled receptors: the evolution of structural insight. , 2017, AIMS biophysics.

[17]  Judith A Cole,et al.  GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures. , 2019, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[18]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  The RING 2.0 web server for high quality residue interaction networks , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Hualiang Jiang,et al.  Agonist-bound structure of the human P2Y12 receptor , 2014, Nature.

[20]  Anat Levit,et al.  Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise. , 2010, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[21]  Alex C. Conner,et al.  Understanding the common themes and diverse roles of the second extracellular loop (ECL2) of the GPCR super-family , 2017, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[22]  Geng-Ming Hu,et al.  Visualizing the GPCR Network: Classification and Evolution , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[23]  David E. Gloriam,et al.  Pharmacogenomics of GPCR Drug Targets , 2018, Cell.

[24]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Bogdan Lesyng,et al.  Generalized Born model: Analysis, refinement, and applications to proteins , 2004 .

[26]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Measuring proteins and voids in proteins , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Bryan L. Roth,et al.  Structure of the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptor in Complex with a Peptide Mimetic , 2012, Nature.

[28]  R. Stevens,et al.  Structure of the human k-opioid receptor in complex with JDTic , 2012 .

[29]  Ron O. Dror,et al.  High-resolution crystal structure of human Protease-Activated Receptor 1 bound to the antagonist vorapaxar , 2012, Nature.

[30]  C. DeLisi,et al.  Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  J. Simms,et al.  Lifting the lid on GPCRs: the role of extracellular loops , 2011, British journal of pharmacology.

[32]  Jens Meiler,et al.  RosettaScripts: A Scripting Language Interface to the Rosetta Macromolecular Modeling Suite , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Homology modeling in drug discovery: current trends and applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[34]  W. Gong,et al.  Structures of the Human PGD2 Receptor CRTH2 Reveal Novel Mechanisms for Ligand Recognition. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[35]  O. Civelli,et al.  Orphan GPCR research , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[36]  Sujata Sharma,et al.  Structural basis for the cooperative allosteric activation of the free fatty acid receptor GPR40 , 2017, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.