A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas
暂无分享,去创建一个
Davide Geneletti | Niki Frantzeskaki | Carlo Calfapietra | Pam Berry | Margaretha Breil | Mihai Razvan Nita | Nadja Kabisch | Christopher M. Raymond | N. Frantzeskaki | C. Raymond | M. Niță | D. Geneletti | P. Berry | C. Calfapietra | N. Kabisch | M. Breil
[1] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. The Dynamics of Urban Ecosystem Governance in Rotterdam, The Netherlands , 2014, AMBIO.
[2] P. Kareiva,et al. Ecosystem services , 2005, Current Biology.
[3] Navroz K. Dubash,et al. Measuring the Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation , 2014 .
[4] C. V. D. Bosch,et al. User participation in urban green spaces – For the people or the parks? , 2015 .
[5] J. Colding,et al. The potential of ‘Urban Green Commons’ in the resilience building of cities , 2013 .
[6] Jan Staes,et al. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services; Soil ecosystems , 2018 .
[7] Katharina Helming,et al. Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making , 2012 .
[8] Elisabeth K. Larson,et al. The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: The case of the Phoenix metropolitan area , 2013 .
[10] C. V. Izeogu. Urban development and the environment in Port Harcourt , 1989 .
[11] David Pearlmutter,et al. Knowledge transfer between stakeholders in the field of urban forestry and green infrastructure: Results of a European survey , 2015 .
[12] Yoshihisa Kashima,et al. Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world , 2016 .
[13] Julian D. Olden,et al. Case studies in co-benefits approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation , 2017 .
[14] Rebecca Jordan,et al. Using fuzzy cognitive mapping as a participatory approach to analyze change, preferred states, and perceived resilience of social-ecological systems , 2015 .
[15] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. Ecosystem Services in Urban Land-Use Planning: Integration Challenges in Complex Urban Settings - Case of Stockholm , 2016 .
[16] D. Geneletti,et al. Ecosystem-based adaptation in cities: An analysis of European urban climate adaptation plans , 2016 .
[17] T. Gerstenberg,et al. Perception and preference of trees: A psychological contribution to tree species selection in urban areas , 2016 .
[18] Darryl J. Newport,et al. Renaturing cities using a regionally-focused biodiversity-led multifunctional benefits approach to urban green infrastructure , 2016 .
[19] Elizabeth Fassman-Beck,et al. A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure , 2014 .
[20] R. D. Groot,et al. Effects of urban trees on local outdoor microclimate: synthesizing field measurements by numerical modelling , 2015, Urban Ecosystems.
[21] H. Wehrden,et al. Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas , 2016 .
[22] Richard J Hobbs,et al. Hurdles and Opportunities for Landscape-Scale Restoration , 2013, Science.
[23] A. R. Ennos,et al. The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK , 2013 .
[24] D. Horst,et al. The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning , 2015 .
[25] T. Elmqvist,et al. Civic ecology practices : Participatory approaches to generating and measuring ecosystem services in cities , 2014 .
[26] L. Gallagher,et al. The Science, Policy and Practice Interface , 2017 .
[27] Frans van de Ven,et al. Adaptation Planning Support Toolbox: Measurable performance information based tools for co-creation of resilient, ecosystem-based urban plans with urban designers, decision-makers and stakeholders , 2016 .
[28] Simon Bell,et al. DPSIR = A Problem Structuring Method? An exploration from the "Imagine" approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[29] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action , 2016 .
[30] Emmanuelle Cohen-Shacham,et al. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges , 2016 .
[31] Sander Jacobs,et al. Nature‐Based Solutions for Europe's Sustainable Development , 2017 .
[32] K. Calvin,et al. A multi-model assessment of the co-benefits of climate mitigation for global air quality , 2016 .
[33] Peter H. Verburg,et al. Bundles of ecosystem (dis)services and multifunctionality across European landscapes. , 2017 .
[34] Stanley T. Asah,et al. Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach , 2017 .
[35] Paula Vandergert,et al. Urban transformation with TURAS open innovations; opportunities for transitioning through transdisciplinarity , 2016 .
[36] P. Verburg,et al. Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation : How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? , 2017 .
[37] Maggie Roe,et al. Green Infrastructure Planning Guide , 2006 .
[38] Ian Mell,et al. Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? Examining the “green” of Green Infrastructure development , 2013 .
[39] Mojca Nastran,et al. Advancing urban ecosystem governance in Ljubljana , 2016 .
[40] Sarah Jones,et al. The role of green infrastructure in climate change adaptation in London , 2014 .
[41] T. Elmqvist,et al. Insurance Value of Green Infrastructure in and Around Cities , 2016, Ecosystems.
[42] Dagmar Haase,et al. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.
[43] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities , 2015 .
[44] A. Meiner,et al. An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 , 2016 .
[45] Dale S. Rothman,et al. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR , 2008 .
[46] Ralf Seppelt,et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability , 2015 .
[47] J. C. Stevens,et al. A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services , 2008 .
[48] Thomas Elmqvist,et al. Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities. Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities. , 2015 .
[49] C. Raymond,et al. Integrating multiple elements of environmental justice into urban blue space planning using public participation geographic information systems , 2016 .
[50] Stanley T. Asah,et al. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people , 2015 .
[51] B. Grizzetti,et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .
[52] I. M. Bouwma,et al. Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies , 2017 .
[53] Iain S. Donnison,et al. Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment , 2017 .
[54] Joanne F. Tynon,et al. Attitudes about urban nature parks: A case study of users and nonusers in Portland, Oregon , 2013 .
[55] José I. Barredo,et al. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services - An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 , 2013 .
[56] Juliane Mathey,et al. Greening cities – To be socially inclusive?: About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities , 2017 .
[57] Carl Folke,et al. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability , 2017 .
[58] Leo Posthuma,et al. Definition and use of Solution-focused Sustainability Assessment: A novel approach to generate, explore and decide on sustainable solutions for wicked problems. , 2016, Environment international.
[59] Md. Saidul Islam,et al. Community Capitals as Community Resilience to Climate Change: Conceptual Connections , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[60] Tommy Dalgaard,et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape , 2014 .
[61] Grazia Zulian,et al. Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study , 2015 .
[62] J. Ahern,et al. The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation , 2014 .
[63] N. Mittal,et al. Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.
[64] W. Adger,et al. Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change , 2011 .
[65] N. Kabisch. Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning—The case of Berlin, Germany , 2015 .
[66] A. Bonn,et al. Nature-Based Solutions for Societal Goals Under Climate Change in Urban Areas – Synthesis and Ways Forward , 2017 .
[67] I. Kruhlov,et al. Measurement, Collaborative Learning and Research for Sustainable Use of Ecosystem Services: Landscape Concepts and Europe as Laboratory , 2013, AMBIO.
[68] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities , 2015 .
[69] M. Barba,et al. Spinal Fusion in the Next Generation: Gene and Cell Therapy Approaches , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.
[70] J. B. Andrade,et al. Early Stage Design Decisions: The Way to Achieve Sustainable Buildings at Lower Costs , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.
[71] Josep Peñuelas,et al. Urban plant physiology: adaptation-mitigation strategies under permanent stress. , 2015, Trends in plant science.
[72] Marcus Collier,et al. Operationalizing urban resilience through a framework for adaptive co-management and design: Five experiments in urban planning practice and policy , 2016 .
[73] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. Advancing urban environmental governance: Understanding theories, practices and processes shaping urban sustainability and resilience , 2016 .
[74] John Icely,et al. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems , 2015 .
[75] R. Leichenko,et al. Climate change and urban resilience , 2011 .
[76] N. Frantzeskaki,et al. Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany , 2016 .
[77] M. Scopelliti,et al. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas , 2015 .
[78] Dominique van de Walle,et al. Impact Evaluation , 2008 .
[80] E. Bennett,et al. Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production , 2016 .
[81] E. Ostrom,et al. Insight, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges , 2014 .
[82] K. Specht,et al. Application and evaluation of a participatory “open innovation” approach (ROIR): The case of introducing zero-acreage farming in Berlin , 2016 .
[83] M. Futter,et al. Realising the potential of natural water retention measures in catchment flood management: trade‐offs and matching interests , 2018 .
[84] Jorge Humberto Amorim,et al. Functional traits of urban trees: air pollution mitigation potential , 2016 .
[85] M. Dennis,et al. User participation in urban green commons: Exploring the links between access, voluntarism, biodiversity and well being , 2016 .