Judging situations: On the effortful process of taking dispositional information into account.

How do people draw inferences from others' behavior? Research suggests that it is an effortful process for perceivers to take situational information into account when drawing a dispositional inference. It is proposed that this previous work may reflect perceivers' general difficulty in thinking about alternatives rather than a distinction between how people think dispositionally and how they think situationally. An experiment investigated whether it requires effort for perceivers to take dispositional information into account when drawing a situational inference. Participants viewed a silent videotape of an anxious interviewee with the goal of diagnosing the degree of anxiety provoked by the interview topic. Participants were given either calm or anxious information about the interviewee's personality. Within these conditions, half of the participants were cognitively busy and half were not. Nonbusy participants were able to use information about the target's disposition when drawing situational inferenc...

[1]  H. Kelley.  Causal schemata and the attribution process , 1972 .

[2]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[3]  J. G. Miller.  Culture and development of everyday social explanation. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  M. Lupfer,et al.  Impact of context on spontaneous trait and situational attributions. , 1990 .

[5]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. , 1994 .

[6]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. , 1993 .

[7]  M. Brewer.  A dual process model of impression formation. , 1988 .

[8]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Use of Trait Conceptions to Identify Other People's Behavior and to Draw Inferences about their Personalities , 1993 .

[9]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[10]  C. Macrae,et al.  Stereotypes and Mental Life: The Case of the Motivated but Thwarted Tactician , 1994 .

[11]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Mediation among attributional inferences and comprehension processes: Initial findings and a general method. , 1983 .

[12]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[13]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. , 1985 .

[14]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes , 1987 .

[15]  D T Gilbert,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Fleeting Gleam of Praise Cognitive Processes Underlying Behavioral Reactions to Self-relevant Feedback , 2022 .

[16]  D. Erickson,et al.  Inferential Hopscotch: How People Draw Social Inferences From Behavior , 1995 .

[17]  R. D. Hansen,et al.  Discounting and augmenting facilitative and inhibitory forces: The winner takes almost all. , 1985 .

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[19]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Person memory and judgment. , 1989, Psychological review.

[20]  L. Newman.  How Individualists Interpret Behavior: Idiocentrism and Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1993 .

[21]  Y. Trope.  Identification and Inferential Processes in Dispositional Attribution. , 1986 .

[22]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. , 1994 .

[23]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[24]  G. Reeder.  Trait-Behavior Relations and Dispositional Inference , 1993 .

[25]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. , 1991 .

[26]  Y. Trope,et al.  Behavior identification as a mediator of dispositional inference. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  D. Schopflocher,et al.  Instigation of Attribution Processes by Attributional Questions , 1978 .

[28]  R. Hastie.  Causes and effects of causal attribution , 1984 .

[29]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  Need for Cognition and the Correspondence Bias , 1992 .

[30]  G. Bodenhausen.  Stereotypes as Judgmental Heuristics: Evidence of Circadian Variations in Discrimination , 1990 .

[31]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[32]  L. Newman,et al.  Can personality traits be inferred automatically? Spontaneous inferences require cognitive capacity at encoding , 1992, Consciousness and Cognition.

[33]  D. M. Webster.  Motivated augmentation and reduction of the overattribution bias. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Thinking backward: some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness , 1989 .

[35]  D. Krull,et al.  Does the Grist Change the Mill? The Effect of the Perceiver's Inferential Goal on the Process of Social Inference , 1993 .

[36]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Patrick S. Malone,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .