Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study

Background A recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that induction of labour at 39 weeks of gestational age has no short-term adverse effect on the mother or infant among nulliparous women aged ≥35 years. However, the trial was underpowered to address the effect of routine induction of labour on the risk of perinatal death. We aimed to determine the association between induction of labour at ≥39 weeks and the risk of perinatal mortality among nulliparous women aged ≥35 years. Methods and findings We used English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data collected between April 2009 and March 2014 to compare perinatal mortality between induction of labour at 39, 40, and 41 weeks of gestation and expectant management (continuation of pregnancy to either spontaneous labour, induction of labour, or caesarean section at a later gestation). Analysis was by multivariable Poisson regression with adjustment for maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related conditions. Among the cohort of 77,327 nulliparous women aged 35 to 50 years delivering a singleton infant, 33.1% had labour induced: these women tended to be older and more likely to have medical complications of pregnancy, and the infants were more likely to be small for gestational age. Induction of labour at 40 weeks (compared with expectant management) was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital perinatal death (0.08% versus 0.26%; adjusted risk ratio [adjRR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.13–0.80, P = 0.015) and meconium aspiration syndrome (0.44% versus 0.86%; adjRR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35–0.78, P = 0.002). Induction at 40 weeks was also associated with a slightly increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (adjRR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01–1.11, P = 0.020) and emergency caesarean section (adjRR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.09, P = 0.019). The number needed to treat (NNT) analysis indicated that 562 (95% CI 366–1,210) inductions of labour at 40 weeks would be required to prevent 1 perinatal death. Limitations of the study include the reliance on observational data in which gestational age is recorded in weeks rather than days. There is also the potential for unmeasured confounders and under-recording of induction of labour or perinatal death in the dataset. Conclusions Bringing forward the routine offer of induction of labour from the current recommendation of 41–42 weeks to 40 weeks of gestation in nulliparous women aged ≥35 years may reduce overall rates of perinatal death.

[1]  Gordon C. S. Smith,et al.  Labour induction near term for women aged 35 or over: an economic evaluation , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  K. Harron,et al.  Linking Data for Mothers and Babies in De-Identified Electronic Health Data , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  Gordon C. S. Smith,et al.  Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  W. Grobman Induction of Labor and Cesarean Delivery. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. Hansell,et al.  Routinely collected English birth data sets: comparisons and recommendations for reproductive epidemiology , 2016, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[6]  E. Rogozińska,et al.  Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  A. Majeed,et al.  Quality of routine hospital birth records and the feasibility of their use for creating birth cohorts. , 2013, Journal of public health.

[8]  Communities,et al.  English Indices of Deprivation , 2013 .

[9]  Rolf H H Groenwold,et al.  Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[10]  I. Ford,et al.  Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  J. Pell,et al.  The Effect of Delaying Childbirth on Primary Cesarean Section Rates , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[12]  R. Sauve,et al.  Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[13]  Northgate Hospital Episode Statistics , 2006 .

[14]  K. Joseph,et al.  The Perinatal Effects of Delayed Childbearing , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Mean age of mother, 1970-2000. , 2002, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[16]  Gordon C. S. Smith,et al.  Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  N. Sebire,et al.  The risks associated with pregnancy in women aged 35 years or older. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[18]  G. C. Smith Sex, birth weight, and the risk of stillbirth in Scotland, 1980-1996. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  T J Cole,et al.  Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. , 1995, Archives of disease in childhood.