Post-Fordist Visions and Technological Solutions: Educational Technology and the Labour Process

This paper is concerned with the relationships between pedagogy, technology and the production of education. A central theme is that these relationships are coalescing around three conceptual arrangements of production, characterised by the terms Fordism, neo‐Fordism and post‐Fordism. Each of these ideal‐type models suggests very different social, political and educational outcomes. The paper starts by introducing these terms within the literature. Second, the post‐Fordist debate in distance education is summarised, identifying its strengths, weaknesses, omissions and objectives. Third, the labour process in higher education is explored in more depth, and its relationship to democracy and technology highlighted. The paper concludes with a focus on constructivist models of educational technology and their socio‐political implications.

[1]  Hirst Paul,et al.  Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: theory, evidence and policy implications , 1991 .

[2]  Academic Tradition and Instructional Technology , 1975 .

[3]  Richard Badham,et al.  The New Production Systems Debate , 1989 .

[4]  Annemieke J.M. Roobeek,et al.  The crisis in fordism and the rise of a new technological paradigm , 1987 .

[5]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[6]  David H. Jonassen.  Chaos in instructional design , 1990 .

[7]  M. Denscombe.  The Work Context of Teaching: an analytic framework for the study of teachers in classrooms , 1980 .

[8]  P. Raggatt,et al.  Post-Fordism and Distance Education--A Flexible Strategy for Change. , 1993 .

[9]  G. F. Rohrlich.  A glimpse of father becker in action in a government setting , 1991 .

[10]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Japan's role in a post-fordist age , 1989 .

[11]  William Renner,et al.  The supposed demise of Fordism: Implications for distance education and higher education , 1992 .

[12]  G. Rumble.  Labour Market Theories and Distance Education I: Industrialization and Distance Education , 1995 .

[13]  M. Apple.  The other side of the hidden curriculum: Correspondence theories and the labor process , 1980 .

[14]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[15]  M. Moore.  On a Theory of Independent Study , 1977, Distance Education: International Perspectives.

[16]  K. Grint.  The sociology of work : an introduction , 1991 .

[17]  M. Apple,et al.  “You Don’t Have to Be a Teacher to Teach This Unit:” Teaching, Technology, and Gender in the Classroom , 1990 .

[18]  D. Jonassen.  Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist View of Instructional Design. , 1990 .

[19]  Mark J. Elam,et al.  Puzzling Out the Post-Fordist Debate: Technology, Markets and Institutions , 1990 .

[20]  M. Lawn,et al.  Schoolwork: interpreting the labour process of teaching , 1988 .

[21]  David Hamilton.  Learning About Education: An Unfinished Curriculum , 1990 .

[22]  Education for economic survival: from Fordism to post-Fordism? , 1992 .

[23]  Nick Farnes,et al.  Modes of Production: Fordism and Distance Education , 1993 .