Development of DynamicMC for PHITS Monte Carlo package.

Previously, we have developed DynamicMC for modeling relative movement of Oak Ridge National Laboratory phantom in a radiation field for the Monte Carlo N-Particle package (Health Physics. 2023,124(4):301-309). Using this software, three-dimensional dose distributions in a phantom irradiated by a certain mono-energetic (Mono E) source can be deduced through its graphical user interface. In this study, we extended DynamicMC to be used in combination with the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) by providing it with a higher flexibility for dynamic movement for an anthropomorphic phantom. For this purpose, we implemented four new functions into the software, which are (1) to generate not only Mono E sources but also those having an energy spectrum of an arbitrary radioisotope (2) to calculate the absorbed doses for several radiologically important organs (3) to automatically average the calculated absorbed doses along the path of the phantom and (4) to generate user-defined slab shielding materials. The first and third items utilize the PHITS-specific modalities named radioisotope-source and sumtally functions, respectively. The computational cost and complexity can be dramatically reduced with these features. We anticipate that the present work and the developed open-source tools will be in the interest of nuclear radiation physics community for research and teaching purposes.

[1]  Mehrdad Shahmohammadi Beni,et al.  A dosimetric comparison between ICRP and ORNL phantoms from exposure to 137Cs contaminated soil , 2023, Radiation Physics and Chemistry.

[2]  Kwan Ngok Yu,et al.  DynamicMC: An Open-source GUI Program Coupled with MCNP for Modeling Relative Dynamic Movement of Radioactive Source and ORNL Phantom in a 3-dimensional Radiation Field , 2023, Health physics.

[3]  Kwan Ngok Yu,et al.  On the effectiveness of proton boron fusion therapy (PBFT) at cellular level , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[4]  H. Watabe,et al.  A Feasibility Study on Proton Range Monitoring Using 13N Peak in Inhomogeneous Targets , 2022, Tomography.

[5]  Kwan Ngok Yu,et al.  MCHP (Monte Carlo + Human Phantom): Platform to facilitate teaching nuclear radiation physics , 2021, PloS one.

[6]  N. Banaee,et al.  Neutron contamination in radiotherapy processes: a review study. , 2021, Journal of radiation research.

[7]  Kwan Ngok Yu,et al.  A comparative study on dispersed doses during photon and proton radiation therapy in pediatric applications , 2021, PloS one.

[8]  K. Kase,et al.  Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers. , 2020, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Jae Hun Kim Three principles for radiation safety: time, distance, and shielding , 2018, The Korean journal of pain.

[10]  Takuya Furuta,et al.  Features of Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.02 , 2018 .

[11]  D. Krstić,et al.  Monte Carlo studies on photon interactions in radiobiological experiments , 2017, PloS one.

[12]  Mehrdad Shahmohammadi Beni,et al.  Conversion coefficients for determination of dispersed photon dose during radiotherapy: NRUrad input code for MCNP , 2017, PloS one.

[13]  O. Desouky,et al.  Targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation , 2015 .

[14]  J. Ryan Ionizing radiation: the good, the bad, and the ugly. , 2012, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[15]  İ. Uslu,et al.  Radiation protection for accompanying person and radiation workers in PET/CT. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  Michiaki Kai,et al.  WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations. I. Radiation transport calculation for organ and tissue doses evaluation using JM phantom. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[17]  A. Konefał,et al.  Secondary Radiation Dose during High-energy TBI , 2010 .

[18]  S M Pradhan,et al.  Study of minimum detection limit of TLD personnel monitoring system in India. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  P. Olko,et al.  Thermoluminescent detectors applied in individual monitoring of radiation workers in Europe--a review based on the EURADOS questionnaire. , 2006, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[20]  S. Yeh,et al.  Comparison on characteristics of radiophotoluminescent glass dosemeters and thermoluminescent dosemeters. , 2006, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  日本原子力研究所,et al.  Nuclear decay data for dosimetry calculation : revised data of ICRP Publication 38 , 2005 .

[22]  A. Auvinen,et al.  Cancer Incidence Among Finnish Nuclear Reactor Workers , 2002, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[23]  W. J. Weber,et al.  A Review of Radiation Effects in Solid Nuclear Waste Forms , 1983 .

[24]  P. Cerutti Effects of ionizing radiation on mammalian cells , 1974, The Science of Nature.

[25]  Y. Kasesaz,et al.  Patient-specific dose assessment using CBCT images and Monte Carlo calculations , 2021, Journal of Instrumentation.

[26]  K. Eckerman,et al.  PIMAL: Computational Phantom with Moving Arms and Legs , 2008 .

[27]  J. Valentin The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[28]  W. J. Weber,et al.  Radiation effects in nuclear waste forms for high-level radioactive waste , 1995 .