Feature extraction and selection from acoustic emission signals with an application in grinding wheel condition monitoring

Feature extraction and feature selection are two important issues in sensor-based condition monitoring of any engineering systems. In this study, acoustic emission signals were first collected during grinding operations, next processed by autoregressive modeling or discrete wavelet decomposition for feature extraction, and then the best feature subsets are found by three different feature selection methods, including two proposed ant colony optimization (ACO)-based method and the famous sequential forward floating selection method. Posing monitoring as a classification problem, the evaluation is carried out by the wrapper approach with four different algorithms serving as the classifier. Empirical test results were shown to illustrate the effectiveness of feature extraction and feature selection methods.

[1]  Amr M. Youssef,et al.  Artificial Life Feature Selection Techniques for Prostrate Cancer Diagnosis Using TRUS Images , 2005, ICIAR.

[2]  T.M.A. Maksoud,et al.  Monitoring of the condition of diamond grinding wheels using acoustic emission technique , 2000 .

[3]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  James M. Keller,et al.  A fuzzy K-nearest neighbor algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Jian-Hui Jiang,et al.  Modified Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Variable Selection in QSAR Modeling: QSAR Studies of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  Zhong Yan,et al.  Ant Colony Optimization for Feature Selection in Face Recognition , 2004, ICBA.

[7]  Katsushi Furutani,et al.  In-process measurement of topography change of grinding wheel by using hydrodynamic pressure , 2002 .

[8]  Jun Qu,et al.  GRINDING WHEEL CONDITION MONITORING WITH HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL-BASED CLUSTERING METHODS , 2006 .

[9]  Zheng-Zhi Wang,et al.  Center-based nearest neighbor classifier , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Pawel Lezanski,et al.  An intelligent system for grinding wheel condition monitoring , 2001 .

[11]  Hans Kurt Tönshoff,et al.  Process Monitoring in Grinding , 2002 .

[12]  Jae-Seob Kwak,et al.  Detection of dressing time using the grinding force signal based on the discrete wavelet decomposition , 2004 .

[13]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Ant Algorithms for Discrete Optimization , 1999, Artificial Life.

[14]  Sreeram Ramakrishnan,et al.  A hybrid approach for feature subset selection using neural networks and ant colony optimization , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Akira Hosokawa,et al.  Evaluation of Grinding Wheel Surface by Means of Grinding Sound Discrimination , 2004 .

[16]  Ling Wang,et al.  A Modified Discrete Binary Ant Colony Optimization and Its Application in Chemical Process Fault Diagnosis , 2006, SEAL.

[17]  Hong Hu,et al.  Ant Colony Optimization Combining with Mutual Information for Feature Selection in Support Vector Machines , 2005, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[18]  Rafael Bello,et al.  Two Step Ant Colony System to Solve the Feature Selection Problem , 2006, CIARP.

[19]  Jun Qu,et al.  A wavelet-based methodology for grinding wheel condition monitoring , 2007 .

[20]  E. Whitenton,et al.  Acoustic emission monitoring of high speed grinding of silicon nitride , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[21]  Robert Bauer,et al.  Analysis of wheel wear using force data in surface grinding , 2003 .